全球元分析揭示了海洋变暖和酸化对海带的影响

IF 7.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Miranda Roethler, Robin J. Fales, Cinde Donoghue, Jacqueline L. Padilla-Gamiño
{"title":"全球元分析揭示了海洋变暖和酸化对海带的影响","authors":"Miranda Roethler,&nbsp;Robin J. Fales,&nbsp;Cinde Donoghue,&nbsp;Jacqueline L. Padilla-Gamiño","doi":"10.1002/ecm.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Kelp forests are among the most diverse and productive ecosystems in the world, providing critical habitat for numerous ecologically and economically important species. However, kelps are at risk from climate change, and declining populations worldwide demonstrate the need to characterize and quantify the effects of anthropogenic stressors on kelp physiology. Here, we performed a meta-analysis on true kelps (order Laminariales) in response to ocean warming and acidification based on a global synthesis of 7000 data points from 143 experimental studies. Our results show that ocean warming has a strong negative impact on kelps at all life stages and across various physiological levels, including growth, reproduction, and survival. In contrast, ocean acidification generally has no effect, except for its negative impact on reproduction. In most cases, co-occurring warming and acidification acted synergistically. Response to warming, acidification, and multiple driver scenarios increased as the intensity and duration of exposure increased. In our analyses, the genera <i>Eualaria</i>, <i>Hedophyllum, Lessonia</i>, and <i>Postelsia</i> were among the most vulnerable to warming. Studies conducted in the temperate northern Pacific showed extreme negative effects of warming. We also identify key gaps in our understanding of kelp responses to climate change, such as the impacts on microscopic spores and the combined effects of warming and acidification. This analysis synthesizes trends in a rapidly expanding field of literature and provides a deeper understanding of how kelps will respond to a rapidly changing ocean.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"95 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global meta-analysis reveals the impacts of ocean warming and acidification on kelps\",\"authors\":\"Miranda Roethler,&nbsp;Robin J. Fales,&nbsp;Cinde Donoghue,&nbsp;Jacqueline L. Padilla-Gamiño\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecm.70034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Kelp forests are among the most diverse and productive ecosystems in the world, providing critical habitat for numerous ecologically and economically important species. However, kelps are at risk from climate change, and declining populations worldwide demonstrate the need to characterize and quantify the effects of anthropogenic stressors on kelp physiology. Here, we performed a meta-analysis on true kelps (order Laminariales) in response to ocean warming and acidification based on a global synthesis of 7000 data points from 143 experimental studies. Our results show that ocean warming has a strong negative impact on kelps at all life stages and across various physiological levels, including growth, reproduction, and survival. In contrast, ocean acidification generally has no effect, except for its negative impact on reproduction. In most cases, co-occurring warming and acidification acted synergistically. Response to warming, acidification, and multiple driver scenarios increased as the intensity and duration of exposure increased. In our analyses, the genera <i>Eualaria</i>, <i>Hedophyllum, Lessonia</i>, and <i>Postelsia</i> were among the most vulnerable to warming. Studies conducted in the temperate northern Pacific showed extreme negative effects of warming. We also identify key gaps in our understanding of kelp responses to climate change, such as the impacts on microscopic spores and the combined effects of warming and acidification. This analysis synthesizes trends in a rapidly expanding field of literature and provides a deeper understanding of how kelps will respond to a rapidly changing ocean.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Monographs\",\"volume\":\"95 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Monographs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.70034\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.70034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海带林是世界上最多样化和最多产的生态系统之一,为许多生态和经济上重要的物种提供了重要的栖息地。然而,海带正面临着气候变化的威胁,全球海带数量的下降表明有必要对人为压力源对海带生理的影响进行表征和量化。在这里,我们基于143项实验研究的7000个数据点的全球综合,对真海带(叠层藻目)对海洋变暖和酸化的响应进行了荟萃分析。我们的研究结果表明,海洋变暖对海带在所有生命阶段和各个生理水平(包括生长、繁殖和生存)都有强烈的负面影响。相比之下,海洋酸化除了对繁殖产生负面影响外,通常没有任何影响。在大多数情况下,共同发生的变暖和酸化协同作用。对变暖、酸化和多种驱动情景的响应随着暴露强度和持续时间的增加而增加。在我们的分析中,黄菖蒲属、红菖蒲属、菖蒲属和菖蒲属是最易受气候变暖影响的植物。在温带北太平洋进行的研究显示了气候变暖的极端负面影响。我们还确定了我们对海带对气候变化的反应的理解中的关键空白,例如对微观孢子的影响以及变暖和酸化的综合影响。这一分析综合了快速扩展的文学领域的趋势,并提供了对海带如何应对快速变化的海洋的更深层次的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Global meta-analysis reveals the impacts of ocean warming and acidification on kelps

Global meta-analysis reveals the impacts of ocean warming and acidification on kelps

Kelp forests are among the most diverse and productive ecosystems in the world, providing critical habitat for numerous ecologically and economically important species. However, kelps are at risk from climate change, and declining populations worldwide demonstrate the need to characterize and quantify the effects of anthropogenic stressors on kelp physiology. Here, we performed a meta-analysis on true kelps (order Laminariales) in response to ocean warming and acidification based on a global synthesis of 7000 data points from 143 experimental studies. Our results show that ocean warming has a strong negative impact on kelps at all life stages and across various physiological levels, including growth, reproduction, and survival. In contrast, ocean acidification generally has no effect, except for its negative impact on reproduction. In most cases, co-occurring warming and acidification acted synergistically. Response to warming, acidification, and multiple driver scenarios increased as the intensity and duration of exposure increased. In our analyses, the genera Eualaria, Hedophyllum, Lessonia, and Postelsia were among the most vulnerable to warming. Studies conducted in the temperate northern Pacific showed extreme negative effects of warming. We also identify key gaps in our understanding of kelp responses to climate change, such as the impacts on microscopic spores and the combined effects of warming and acidification. This analysis synthesizes trends in a rapidly expanding field of literature and provides a deeper understanding of how kelps will respond to a rapidly changing ocean.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信