长链非编码RNA作为口腔鳞状细胞癌的潜在诊断生物标志物:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Xingyu Liu, Jing Qiao, Han Qin
{"title":"长链非编码RNA作为口腔鳞状细胞癌的潜在诊断生物标志物:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xingyu Liu, Jing Qiao, Han Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in differentiating patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), and to explore their potential role in early detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published updated to 1 December 2024. Studies that explored the diagnostic accuracy of lncRNAs in OSCC were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated using indicators such as sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) by random effects modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of eight studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 532 patients diagnosed with OSCC and 446 controls. The pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.61 to 0.97), and the specificity was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76 to 0.93). The pooled PLR was 6.75 (95% CI: 3.12 to 14.58), and the NLR was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.04 to 0.57). The overall DOR was 46.87 (95% CI: 6.20 to 354.18). A higher diagnostic value was found for salivary and/or blood lncRNAs (DOR: 123.22; 95% CI: 9.79 to 1550.8) than for tissue lncRNAs (DOR: 6.24; 95% CI: 3.29 to 11.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has demonstrated that lncRNAs were found to achieve high diagnostic accuracy for OSCC. lncRNAs expressed in body fluids have higher diagnostic value than those in tissues, and can be effectively utilized as potential biomarkers for OSCC detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102581"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long non-coding RNA as a potential diagnostic biomarker in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xingyu Liu, Jing Qiao, Han Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in differentiating patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), and to explore their potential role in early detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published updated to 1 December 2024. Studies that explored the diagnostic accuracy of lncRNAs in OSCC were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated using indicators such as sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) by random effects modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of eight studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 532 patients diagnosed with OSCC and 446 controls. The pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.61 to 0.97), and the specificity was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76 to 0.93). The pooled PLR was 6.75 (95% CI: 3.12 to 14.58), and the NLR was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.04 to 0.57). The overall DOR was 46.87 (95% CI: 6.20 to 354.18). A higher diagnostic value was found for salivary and/or blood lncRNAs (DOR: 123.22; 95% CI: 9.79 to 1550.8) than for tissue lncRNAs (DOR: 6.24; 95% CI: 3.29 to 11.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has demonstrated that lncRNAs were found to achieve high diagnostic accuracy for OSCC. lncRNAs expressed in body fluids have higher diagnostic value than those in tissues, and can be effectively utilized as potential biomarkers for OSCC detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102581\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102581","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估长链非编码rna (lncRNAs)在口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)诊断中的准确性,并探讨其在口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)早期发现中的潜在作用。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library中更新至2024年12月1日的文献。包括探讨lncrna在OSCC诊断准确性的研究。使用QUADAS-2评估偏倚风险。采用随机效应建模,采用敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)、诊断优势比(DOR)等指标计算诊断准确性。结果:本荟萃分析共纳入8项研究,包括532例确诊为OSCC的患者和446例对照。合并敏感性为0.87 (95% CI: 0.61 ~ 0.97),特异性为0.87 (95% CI: 0.76 ~ 0.93)。合并PLR为6.75 (95% CI: 3.12 ~ 14.58), NLR为0.14 (95% CI: 0.04 ~ 0.57)。总DOR为46.87 (95% CI: 6.20至354.18)。唾液和/或血液lncRNAs (DOR: 123.22; 95% CI: 9.79至1550.8)比组织lncRNAs (DOR: 6.24; 95% CI: 3.29至11.86)具有更高的诊断价值。结论:本研究表明,发现lncrna对OSCC具有较高的诊断准确性。在体液中表达的lncrna比在组织中表达的lncrna具有更高的诊断价值,可以有效地作为潜在的OSCC检测生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long non-coding RNA as a potential diagnostic biomarker in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: This study was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in differentiating patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), and to explore their potential role in early detection.

Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published updated to 1 December 2024. Studies that explored the diagnostic accuracy of lncRNAs in OSCC were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated using indicators such as sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) by random effects modeling.

Results: A total of eight studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 532 patients diagnosed with OSCC and 446 controls. The pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.61 to 0.97), and the specificity was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76 to 0.93). The pooled PLR was 6.75 (95% CI: 3.12 to 14.58), and the NLR was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.04 to 0.57). The overall DOR was 46.87 (95% CI: 6.20 to 354.18). A higher diagnostic value was found for salivary and/or blood lncRNAs (DOR: 123.22; 95% CI: 9.79 to 1550.8) than for tissue lncRNAs (DOR: 6.24; 95% CI: 3.29 to 11.86).

Conclusions: This study has demonstrated that lncRNAs were found to achieve high diagnostic accuracy for OSCC. lncRNAs expressed in body fluids have higher diagnostic value than those in tissues, and can be effectively utilized as potential biomarkers for OSCC detection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
305
期刊介绍: J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics. Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must: Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise; Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research; Be solely the work of the author(s) stated; Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal; Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed. Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信