同理心在批判性推理中的作用以及医疗人工智能系统的局限性。

IF 1.9 3区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Martina Favaretto, Kyle Stroh
{"title":"同理心在批判性推理中的作用以及医疗人工智能系统的局限性。","authors":"Martina Favaretto, Kyle Stroh","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhaf022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recent developments of medical AI systems (MAIS) open up questions as to whether and to what extent MAIS can be modeled to include empathetic understanding, as well as what impact MAIS' lack of empathetic understanding would have on its ability to perform the necessary critical analyses for reaching a diagnosis and recommending medical treatment. In this article, we argue that current medical AI systems' ability to empathize with patients is severely limited due to its lack of first-person experiences with human interests and that efforts to correct for this deficit-by having MAIS interpret patients' medical and non-medical interests-will encounter significant obstacles. Finally, we demonstrate how MAIS' lack of empathy is likely to hinder its performance in crucial aspects of the processes through which useful medical diagnoses are reached and through which appropriate treatment recommendations for patients are determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":47377,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Empathy in Critical Reasoning and the Limitations of Medical AI Systems.\",\"authors\":\"Martina Favaretto, Kyle Stroh\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jmp/jhaf022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The recent developments of medical AI systems (MAIS) open up questions as to whether and to what extent MAIS can be modeled to include empathetic understanding, as well as what impact MAIS' lack of empathetic understanding would have on its ability to perform the necessary critical analyses for reaching a diagnosis and recommending medical treatment. In this article, we argue that current medical AI systems' ability to empathize with patients is severely limited due to its lack of first-person experiences with human interests and that efforts to correct for this deficit-by having MAIS interpret patients' medical and non-medical interests-will encounter significant obstacles. Finally, we demonstrate how MAIS' lack of empathy is likely to hinder its performance in crucial aspects of the processes through which useful medical diagnoses are reached and through which appropriate treatment recommendations for patients are determined.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaf022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaf022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗人工智能系统(MAIS)的最新发展提出了一些问题,如是否以及在多大程度上可以对MAIS进行建模,以包括移情理解,以及MAIS缺乏移情理解会对其执行必要的批判性分析以达到诊断和推荐医疗的能力产生什么影响。在本文中,我们认为目前的医疗人工智能系统对患者的同情能力受到严重限制,因为它缺乏对人类利益的第一人称体验,并且通过让MAIS解释患者的医疗和非医疗利益来纠正这一缺陷的努力将遇到重大障碍。最后,我们证明了MAIS缺乏同理心可能会阻碍其在过程的关键方面的表现,通过这些过程可以获得有用的医学诊断,并通过这些过程确定对患者的适当治疗建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Empathy in Critical Reasoning and the Limitations of Medical AI Systems.

The recent developments of medical AI systems (MAIS) open up questions as to whether and to what extent MAIS can be modeled to include empathetic understanding, as well as what impact MAIS' lack of empathetic understanding would have on its ability to perform the necessary critical analyses for reaching a diagnosis and recommending medical treatment. In this article, we argue that current medical AI systems' ability to empathize with patients is severely limited due to its lack of first-person experiences with human interests and that efforts to correct for this deficit-by having MAIS interpret patients' medical and non-medical interests-will encounter significant obstacles. Finally, we demonstrate how MAIS' lack of empathy is likely to hinder its performance in crucial aspects of the processes through which useful medical diagnoses are reached and through which appropriate treatment recommendations for patients are determined.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: This bimonthly publication explores the shared themes and concerns of philosophy and the medical sciences. Central issues in medical research and practice have important philosophical dimensions, for, in treating disease and promoting health, medicine involves presuppositions about human goals and values. Conversely, the concerns of philosophy often significantly relate to those of medicine, as philosophers seek to understand the nature of medical knowledge and the human condition in the modern world. In addition, recent developments in medical technology and treatment create moral problems that raise important philosophical questions. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy aims to provide an ongoing forum for the discussion of such themes and issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信