本科护理专业录取标准:叙述性文献综述。

IF 2.5 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2025-09-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608251381667
Eman Al-Awabdeh, Salam Bani Hani, Lisa Bayliss-Pratt, Mohannad Aljabery, Rasha Ibrahim, Abdelrahman Salameh
{"title":"本科护理专业录取标准:叙述性文献综述。","authors":"Eman Al-Awabdeh, Salam Bani Hani, Lisa Bayliss-Pratt, Mohannad Aljabery, Rasha Ibrahim, Abdelrahman Salameh","doi":"10.1177/23779608251381667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Admission criteria for selecting the undergraduate nursing candidates have been a major concern in many countries over the past few decades. The quality of graduate nursing professionals appears to be associated with the effectiveness of undergraduate student selection processes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This literature review aimed to assess and summarize the existing research evidence regarding undergraduate nursing program admission criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two eligible studies were selected for full review from PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Scopus, ERIC, Medline, and CINAHL databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following themes were identified using thematic analysis: grade point average, traditional interviews, and multiple mini-interviews as admission criteria. Studies on commonly used admission criteria, examining their effectiveness and limitations, were reviewed and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The continuous development of admission criteria for undergraduate nursing education has both opportunities and challenges. To choose the best applicants for nursing programs, a thorough evaluation was required by using a multifaceted selection process that equally considers caring values, academic ability, and overall potential. This can significantly contribute to the progress of the nursing profession and, more importantly, the safety and quality of care that patients and local communities will receive.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"11 ","pages":"23779608251381667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12475341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Admission Criteria for Undergraduate Nursing Programs: A Narrative Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Eman Al-Awabdeh, Salam Bani Hani, Lisa Bayliss-Pratt, Mohannad Aljabery, Rasha Ibrahim, Abdelrahman Salameh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23779608251381667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Admission criteria for selecting the undergraduate nursing candidates have been a major concern in many countries over the past few decades. The quality of graduate nursing professionals appears to be associated with the effectiveness of undergraduate student selection processes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This literature review aimed to assess and summarize the existing research evidence regarding undergraduate nursing program admission criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two eligible studies were selected for full review from PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Scopus, ERIC, Medline, and CINAHL databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following themes were identified using thematic analysis: grade point average, traditional interviews, and multiple mini-interviews as admission criteria. Studies on commonly used admission criteria, examining their effectiveness and limitations, were reviewed and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The continuous development of admission criteria for undergraduate nursing education has both opportunities and challenges. To choose the best applicants for nursing programs, a thorough evaluation was required by using a multifaceted selection process that equally considers caring values, academic ability, and overall potential. This can significantly contribute to the progress of the nursing profession and, more importantly, the safety and quality of care that patients and local communities will receive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAGE Open Nursing\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"23779608251381667\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12475341/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAGE Open Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251381667\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251381667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:在过去的几十年里,选择本科护理候选人的录取标准一直是许多国家关注的主要问题。研究生护理专业人员的质量似乎与本科学生选拔过程的有效性有关。目的:本文献综述旨在评估和总结有关本科护理专业录取标准的现有研究证据。方法:从PubMed、Cochrane Library、ScienceDirect、Scopus、ERIC、Medline和CINAHL数据库中选择22项符合条件的研究进行全面综述。结果:使用主题分析确定了以下主题:平均成绩,传统面试和多个迷你面试作为入学标准。对常用的录取标准的研究进行了回顾和分析,考察了其有效性和局限性。结论:护理本科教育录取标准的不断发展既有机遇,也有挑战。为了选择护理专业的最佳申请者,需要通过多方面的选择过程进行全面的评估,同时考虑到护理价值观、学术能力和整体潜力。这可以大大促进护理专业的进步,更重要的是,患者和当地社区将获得的护理的安全和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Admission Criteria for Undergraduate Nursing Programs: A Narrative Literature Review.

Introduction: Admission criteria for selecting the undergraduate nursing candidates have been a major concern in many countries over the past few decades. The quality of graduate nursing professionals appears to be associated with the effectiveness of undergraduate student selection processes.

Aim: This literature review aimed to assess and summarize the existing research evidence regarding undergraduate nursing program admission criteria.

Methods: Twenty-two eligible studies were selected for full review from PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Scopus, ERIC, Medline, and CINAHL databases.

Results: The following themes were identified using thematic analysis: grade point average, traditional interviews, and multiple mini-interviews as admission criteria. Studies on commonly used admission criteria, examining their effectiveness and limitations, were reviewed and analyzed.

Conclusion: The continuous development of admission criteria for undergraduate nursing education has both opportunities and challenges. To choose the best applicants for nursing programs, a thorough evaluation was required by using a multifaceted selection process that equally considers caring values, academic ability, and overall potential. This can significantly contribute to the progress of the nursing profession and, more importantly, the safety and quality of care that patients and local communities will receive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信