大型语言模型及其在围手术期医学中的应用:范围审查协议。

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-25-00003
Arnaud Romeo Mbadjeu Hondjeu, Zi Ying Zhao, Luka Newton, Anass Ajenkar, Bassam Termos, Risa Shorr, Karim Ladha, Duminda Wijeysundera, Daniel I McIsaac
{"title":"大型语言模型及其在围手术期医学中的应用:范围审查协议。","authors":"Arnaud Romeo Mbadjeu Hondjeu, Zi Ying Zhao, Luka Newton, Anass Ajenkar, Bassam Termos, Risa Shorr, Karim Ladha, Duminda Wijeysundera, Daniel I McIsaac","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to map existing evidence on the applications of large language models (LLMs) in perioperative care, including the types of technologies employed, the clinical tasks they support, and the evidence gaps that may influence their future adoption.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The perioperative period-encompassing care from surgical planning through postoperative recovery-is complex and time-sensitive, requiring rapid, accurate, and context-specific decision-making to optimize patient outcomes. LLMs offer new opportunities to streamline workflows, enhance clinical decision support, and personalize patient education. However, their implementation also raises concerns, including risks of error, ethical challenges, and biases inherent in training data. A systematic overview of current applications is needed to guide safe and effective integration of LLMs into perioperative care.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This review will include studies of any design, including randomized and non-randomized trials, case reports, and letters presenting primary data on the use of LLMs in perioperative contexts. Eligible settings span the perioperative continuum, from preoperative assessment and surgical planning to intraoperative support, discharge, and recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will adhere to the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A peer-reviewed search strategy will be used in the databases MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), EBM Reviews (Ovid), and Scopus. Two reviewers will independently identify eligible studies at title and abstract stage and then screen for full texts. Information on study details will be charted in duplicate onto standardized data collection forms. Results will be presented using descriptive summaries, frequency tables, and visual plots that highlight the extent of evidence and remaining gaps.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/a3tkw/.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2091-2103"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12517723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large language models and their current use in perioperative medicine: a scoping review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Arnaud Romeo Mbadjeu Hondjeu, Zi Ying Zhao, Luka Newton, Anass Ajenkar, Bassam Termos, Risa Shorr, Karim Ladha, Duminda Wijeysundera, Daniel I McIsaac\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-25-00003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to map existing evidence on the applications of large language models (LLMs) in perioperative care, including the types of technologies employed, the clinical tasks they support, and the evidence gaps that may influence their future adoption.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The perioperative period-encompassing care from surgical planning through postoperative recovery-is complex and time-sensitive, requiring rapid, accurate, and context-specific decision-making to optimize patient outcomes. LLMs offer new opportunities to streamline workflows, enhance clinical decision support, and personalize patient education. However, their implementation also raises concerns, including risks of error, ethical challenges, and biases inherent in training data. A systematic overview of current applications is needed to guide safe and effective integration of LLMs into perioperative care.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This review will include studies of any design, including randomized and non-randomized trials, case reports, and letters presenting primary data on the use of LLMs in perioperative contexts. Eligible settings span the perioperative continuum, from preoperative assessment and surgical planning to intraoperative support, discharge, and recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will adhere to the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A peer-reviewed search strategy will be used in the databases MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), EBM Reviews (Ovid), and Scopus. Two reviewers will independently identify eligible studies at title and abstract stage and then screen for full texts. Information on study details will be charted in duplicate onto standardized data collection forms. Results will be presented using descriptive summaries, frequency tables, and visual plots that highlight the extent of evidence and remaining gaps.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/a3tkw/.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2091-2103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12517723/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-25-00003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-25-00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本综述旨在绘制大语言模型(llm)在围手术期护理中应用的现有证据,包括所采用的技术类型、它们支持的临床任务以及可能影响其未来采用的证据差距。围手术期(包括从手术计划到术后恢复的护理)是复杂和时间敏感的,需要快速、准确和具体的决策来优化患者的结果。法学硕士为简化工作流程、加强临床决策支持和个性化患者教育提供了新的机会。然而,它们的实施也引起了人们的关注,包括错误的风险、道德挑战和训练数据固有的偏见。需要对目前的应用进行系统的概述,以指导安全有效地将llm整合到围手术期护理中。入选标准:本综述将包括任何设计的研究,包括随机和非随机试验、病例报告和提供llm在围手术期使用的主要数据的信函。符合条件的设置跨越围手术期连续体,从术前评估和手术计划到术中支持,出院和恢复。方法:本次评审将遵循JBI方法进行范围评审。同行评议的搜索策略将在MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase (Ovid)、EBM Reviews (Ovid)和Scopus数据库中使用。两位审稿人将独立地在标题和摘要阶段确定符合条件的研究,然后筛选全文。有关研究详情的资料将一式两份列于标准化数据收集表格上。结果将使用描述性摘要、频率表和视觉图来展示,以突出证据的程度和剩余的差距。评审注册:OSF https://osf.io/a3tkw/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Large language models and their current use in perioperative medicine: a scoping review protocol.

Objective: This review aims to map existing evidence on the applications of large language models (LLMs) in perioperative care, including the types of technologies employed, the clinical tasks they support, and the evidence gaps that may influence their future adoption.

Introduction: The perioperative period-encompassing care from surgical planning through postoperative recovery-is complex and time-sensitive, requiring rapid, accurate, and context-specific decision-making to optimize patient outcomes. LLMs offer new opportunities to streamline workflows, enhance clinical decision support, and personalize patient education. However, their implementation also raises concerns, including risks of error, ethical challenges, and biases inherent in training data. A systematic overview of current applications is needed to guide safe and effective integration of LLMs into perioperative care.

Eligibility criteria: This review will include studies of any design, including randomized and non-randomized trials, case reports, and letters presenting primary data on the use of LLMs in perioperative contexts. Eligible settings span the perioperative continuum, from preoperative assessment and surgical planning to intraoperative support, discharge, and recovery.

Methods: This review will adhere to the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A peer-reviewed search strategy will be used in the databases MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), EBM Reviews (Ovid), and Scopus. Two reviewers will independently identify eligible studies at title and abstract stage and then screen for full texts. Information on study details will be charted in duplicate onto standardized data collection forms. Results will be presented using descriptive summaries, frequency tables, and visual plots that highlight the extent of evidence and remaining gaps.

Review registration: OSF https://osf.io/a3tkw/.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信