迁移:一个关键概念。

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Comparative Migration Studies Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-25 DOI:10.1186/s40878-025-00497-1
Katharine Charsley, Nicole Hoellerer
{"title":"迁移:一个关键概念。","authors":"Katharine Charsley, Nicole Hoellerer","doi":"10.1186/s40878-025-00497-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Migrantisation has become a key concept among scholars attempting to de-naturalise and de-centre the migrant/citizen binary. It has, however, been used in a variety of ways that have not always been clearly delineated. In this paper we tease out the strands of development of the concept, distinguishing different usages of migrantisation, and propose a new terminology to clarify the ways in which the term can serve a variety of purposes at different analytical levels. In particular, we identify two separate strands in the literature: 'demographic migrantisation' and 'categorical migrantisation'. The latter is most consequential for Migration Studies, and so forms the main focus of this article, along with two further contributions developing from the categorical migrantisation approach: 'migrantisation as an analytical perspective', and the recently introduced concept of 'experiential migrantisation'. Our discussion foregrounds the multi-dimensional nature of categorical migrantisation, which takes place across multiple domains, and is intersectional and contextual in character. In creating a more systematic understanding of the concept of migrantisation, we hope to lay clearer foundations for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":37051,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Migration Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Migrantisation: a key concept.\",\"authors\":\"Katharine Charsley, Nicole Hoellerer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40878-025-00497-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Migrantisation has become a key concept among scholars attempting to de-naturalise and de-centre the migrant/citizen binary. It has, however, been used in a variety of ways that have not always been clearly delineated. In this paper we tease out the strands of development of the concept, distinguishing different usages of migrantisation, and propose a new terminology to clarify the ways in which the term can serve a variety of purposes at different analytical levels. In particular, we identify two separate strands in the literature: 'demographic migrantisation' and 'categorical migrantisation'. The latter is most consequential for Migration Studies, and so forms the main focus of this article, along with two further contributions developing from the categorical migrantisation approach: 'migrantisation as an analytical perspective', and the recently introduced concept of 'experiential migrantisation'. Our discussion foregrounds the multi-dimensional nature of categorical migrantisation, which takes place across multiple domains, and is intersectional and contextual in character. In creating a more systematic understanding of the concept of migrantisation, we hope to lay clearer foundations for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Migration Studies\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464009/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Migration Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-025-00497-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-025-00497-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

移民已经成为学者们试图将移民/公民二元对立去自然化和去中心化的一个关键概念。然而,它被用于各种各样的方式,而这些方式并不总是被清楚地描绘出来。在本文中,我们梳理了这个概念的发展脉络,区分了迁移的不同用法,并提出了一个新的术语,以澄清该术语在不同分析层次上服务于各种目的的方式。特别是,我们在文献中确定了两个独立的分支:“人口迁移”和“分类迁移”。后者是移民研究中最重要的,因此形成了本文的主要焦点,以及从分类移民方法中发展出来的两个进一步的贡献:“作为分析视角的移民”,以及最近引入的“体验移民”概念。我们的讨论强调了分类迁移的多维性,它发生在多个领域,并且具有交叉和上下文的特征。通过对迁移概念的更系统的理解,我们希望为未来的研究奠定更清晰的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Migrantisation: a key concept.

Migrantisation has become a key concept among scholars attempting to de-naturalise and de-centre the migrant/citizen binary. It has, however, been used in a variety of ways that have not always been clearly delineated. In this paper we tease out the strands of development of the concept, distinguishing different usages of migrantisation, and propose a new terminology to clarify the ways in which the term can serve a variety of purposes at different analytical levels. In particular, we identify two separate strands in the literature: 'demographic migrantisation' and 'categorical migrantisation'. The latter is most consequential for Migration Studies, and so forms the main focus of this article, along with two further contributions developing from the categorical migrantisation approach: 'migrantisation as an analytical perspective', and the recently introduced concept of 'experiential migrantisation'. Our discussion foregrounds the multi-dimensional nature of categorical migrantisation, which takes place across multiple domains, and is intersectional and contextual in character. In creating a more systematic understanding of the concept of migrantisation, we hope to lay clearer foundations for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Migration Studies
Comparative Migration Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.60%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信