Vuong V Do, Jidong Huang, Terry F Pechacek, Claire A Spears, David L Ashley, Carla J Berg, Scott R Weaver
{"title":"家庭吸烟与电子烟使用限制之间的关系以及香烟和电子烟双重使用者的同时使用行为。","authors":"Vuong V Do, Jidong Huang, Terry F Pechacek, Claire A Spears, David L Ashley, Carla J Berg, Scott R Weaver","doi":"10.18332/tid/209376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited data exist on how home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions influence patterns of cigarette and e-cigarette use among individuals who use both products. This study examined the association between home restrictions and the use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes among dual users of these two products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Adult Consumers of Tobacco Study (ACTS), an online, nationwide survey administered during 2020-2021. A sub-sample of 250 dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes was included in this analysis. Outcome variables were concurrent use behaviors, categorized as predominant smokers (daily smoking, e-cigarette use some days), equivalent users (either daily or some days use of both products), and predominant e-cigarette users (daily e-cigarette use, smoking some days), as well as e-cigarette use frequency (daily vs some days). Primary explanatory variables were home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions (both categorized as complete, partial, or no restrictions). Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between restrictions and concurrent use behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly half (46.8%) of dual users reported having complete smoking restrictions in their homes, complete e-cigarette use restrictions (12.8%), and complete restrictions on both (11.2%). Dual users reported having complete home smoking restrictions (vs no restrictions) were more than two times more likely to be predominant e-cigarette users versus equivalent users or predominant smokers (AOR=2.60; 95% CI: 1.30-5.30), after controlling for home e-cigarette use restrictions and other covariates. Neither partial smoking restrictions nor partial e-cigarette use restrictions were associated with concurrent use behaviors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Small proportions of dual users reported having complete smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions adopted in their homes, suggesting a need for promoting the adoption of such restrictions. Moreover, how and why home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions differentially impact use behaviors warrant additional investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"23 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions and concurrent use behaviors among dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes.\",\"authors\":\"Vuong V Do, Jidong Huang, Terry F Pechacek, Claire A Spears, David L Ashley, Carla J Berg, Scott R Weaver\",\"doi\":\"10.18332/tid/209376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited data exist on how home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions influence patterns of cigarette and e-cigarette use among individuals who use both products. This study examined the association between home restrictions and the use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes among dual users of these two products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Adult Consumers of Tobacco Study (ACTS), an online, nationwide survey administered during 2020-2021. A sub-sample of 250 dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes was included in this analysis. Outcome variables were concurrent use behaviors, categorized as predominant smokers (daily smoking, e-cigarette use some days), equivalent users (either daily or some days use of both products), and predominant e-cigarette users (daily e-cigarette use, smoking some days), as well as e-cigarette use frequency (daily vs some days). Primary explanatory variables were home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions (both categorized as complete, partial, or no restrictions). Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between restrictions and concurrent use behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly half (46.8%) of dual users reported having complete smoking restrictions in their homes, complete e-cigarette use restrictions (12.8%), and complete restrictions on both (11.2%). Dual users reported having complete home smoking restrictions (vs no restrictions) were more than two times more likely to be predominant e-cigarette users versus equivalent users or predominant smokers (AOR=2.60; 95% CI: 1.30-5.30), after controlling for home e-cigarette use restrictions and other covariates. Neither partial smoking restrictions nor partial e-cigarette use restrictions were associated with concurrent use behaviors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Small proportions of dual users reported having complete smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions adopted in their homes, suggesting a need for promoting the adoption of such restrictions. Moreover, how and why home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions differentially impact use behaviors warrant additional investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Induced Diseases\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461832/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Induced Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/209376\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/209376","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association between home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions and concurrent use behaviors among dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes.
Introduction: Limited data exist on how home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions influence patterns of cigarette and e-cigarette use among individuals who use both products. This study examined the association between home restrictions and the use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes among dual users of these two products.
Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Adult Consumers of Tobacco Study (ACTS), an online, nationwide survey administered during 2020-2021. A sub-sample of 250 dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes was included in this analysis. Outcome variables were concurrent use behaviors, categorized as predominant smokers (daily smoking, e-cigarette use some days), equivalent users (either daily or some days use of both products), and predominant e-cigarette users (daily e-cigarette use, smoking some days), as well as e-cigarette use frequency (daily vs some days). Primary explanatory variables were home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions (both categorized as complete, partial, or no restrictions). Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between restrictions and concurrent use behaviors.
Results: Nearly half (46.8%) of dual users reported having complete smoking restrictions in their homes, complete e-cigarette use restrictions (12.8%), and complete restrictions on both (11.2%). Dual users reported having complete home smoking restrictions (vs no restrictions) were more than two times more likely to be predominant e-cigarette users versus equivalent users or predominant smokers (AOR=2.60; 95% CI: 1.30-5.30), after controlling for home e-cigarette use restrictions and other covariates. Neither partial smoking restrictions nor partial e-cigarette use restrictions were associated with concurrent use behaviors.
Conclusions: Small proportions of dual users reported having complete smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions adopted in their homes, suggesting a need for promoting the adoption of such restrictions. Moreover, how and why home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions differentially impact use behaviors warrant additional investigation.
期刊介绍:
Tobacco Induced Diseases encompasses all aspects of research related to the prevention and control of tobacco use at a global level. Preventing diseases attributable to tobacco is only one aspect of the journal, whose overall scope is to provide a forum for the publication of research articles that can contribute to reducing the burden of tobacco induced diseases globally. To address this epidemic we believe that there must be an avenue for the publication of research/policy activities on tobacco control initiatives that may be very important at a regional and national level. This approach provides a very important "hands on" service to the tobacco control community at a global scale - as common problems have common solutions. Hence, we see ourselves as "connectors" within this global community.
The journal hence encourages the submission of articles from all medical, biological and psychosocial disciplines, ranging from medical and dental clinicians, through health professionals to basic biomedical and clinical scientists.