研究人员对纳瓦霍人假设基因研究的态度:来自在线调查的结果。

IF 3.6 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Carissa A Sherman, Nanibaa' A Garrison, Katrina G Claw
{"title":"研究人员对纳瓦霍人假设基因研究的态度:来自在线调查的结果。","authors":"Carissa A Sherman, Nanibaa' A Garrison, Katrina G Claw","doi":"10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Navajo Nation is reevaluating a moratorium on genetic research that was authorized in 2002. While the moratorium was instituted due to cultural concerns and the lack of a Navajo genetic research policy, there remains limited empirical work assessing the perspectives of Diné (Navajo) people and other interest holders regarding genetic research. To address this gap, this study examines the perspectives of research project leaders with protocols approved by the Navajo Nation Human Research Review Board (NNHRRB) as this group is aware of research expectations and cultural considerations. An online survey was designed to gauge researchers' interest in adding a genetic component to their research if the moratorium were lifted, while also examining potential benefits, risks, and ethical considerations. Survey participants (n=36) included 27% Diné researchers and 73% non-Diné researchers, and 50% of researchers (n=18) had collected human biospecimens in their research (e.g., blood, tissue). Our results indicate that if the moratorium on genetic research ended, 42% of researchers (n=15) would be unsure about adding a genetic component to their projects, while 31% (n=11) of researchers were interested. Participants were asked to rank ethical considerations related to five broad topics: community engagement; dissemination of results and data; privacy and rights; health, safety, and equity; and discrimination and mistrust. Participants ranked \"ensure that no research participants are harmed\" and \"give presentations to the community\" as very important whereas \"sharing data with other researchers\" was of low importance. We provide valuable perspectives to guide potential genetic policy development for the Navajo Nation.</p>","PeriodicalId":34530,"journal":{"name":"HGG Advances","volume":" ","pages":"100524"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Researcher Attitudes towards Hypothetical Genetic Research with Navajo People: Results from an Online Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Carissa A Sherman, Nanibaa' A Garrison, Katrina G Claw\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Navajo Nation is reevaluating a moratorium on genetic research that was authorized in 2002. While the moratorium was instituted due to cultural concerns and the lack of a Navajo genetic research policy, there remains limited empirical work assessing the perspectives of Diné (Navajo) people and other interest holders regarding genetic research. To address this gap, this study examines the perspectives of research project leaders with protocols approved by the Navajo Nation Human Research Review Board (NNHRRB) as this group is aware of research expectations and cultural considerations. An online survey was designed to gauge researchers' interest in adding a genetic component to their research if the moratorium were lifted, while also examining potential benefits, risks, and ethical considerations. Survey participants (n=36) included 27% Diné researchers and 73% non-Diné researchers, and 50% of researchers (n=18) had collected human biospecimens in their research (e.g., blood, tissue). Our results indicate that if the moratorium on genetic research ended, 42% of researchers (n=15) would be unsure about adding a genetic component to their projects, while 31% (n=11) of researchers were interested. Participants were asked to rank ethical considerations related to five broad topics: community engagement; dissemination of results and data; privacy and rights; health, safety, and equity; and discrimination and mistrust. Participants ranked \\\"ensure that no research participants are harmed\\\" and \\\"give presentations to the community\\\" as very important whereas \\\"sharing data with other researchers\\\" was of low importance. We provide valuable perspectives to guide potential genetic policy development for the Navajo Nation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HGG Advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HGG Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HGG Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纳瓦霍族正在重新评估2002年批准的暂停基因研究的禁令。虽然暂停是由于文化问题和缺乏纳瓦霍基因研究政策而制定的,但评估纳瓦霍人和其他利益相关者对基因研究的观点的实证工作仍然有限。为了解决这一差距,本研究根据纳瓦霍民族人类研究审查委员会(NNHRRB)批准的协议检查了研究项目负责人的观点,因为该小组意识到研究期望和文化因素。一项在线调查旨在衡量研究人员是否有兴趣在暂停的情况下将基因成分添加到他们的研究中,同时也检查潜在的利益、风险和伦理考虑。调查参与者(n=36)包括27%的din研究人员和73%的非din研究人员,50%的研究人员(n=18)在他们的研究中收集了人类生物标本(如血液、组织)。我们的研究结果表明,如果暂停基因研究结束,42%的研究人员(n=15)不确定是否要在他们的项目中添加基因成分,而31%的研究人员(n=11)对此感兴趣。参与者被要求对与五大主题相关的道德考虑因素进行排名:社区参与;传播结果和数据;隐私和权利;健康、安全和公平;歧视和不信任。参与者认为“确保没有研究参与者受到伤害”和“向社区发表演讲”非常重要,而“与其他研究人员共享数据”的重要性较低。我们提供有价值的观点,指导潜在的遗传政策的发展,为纳瓦霍民族。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Researcher Attitudes towards Hypothetical Genetic Research with Navajo People: Results from an Online Survey.

The Navajo Nation is reevaluating a moratorium on genetic research that was authorized in 2002. While the moratorium was instituted due to cultural concerns and the lack of a Navajo genetic research policy, there remains limited empirical work assessing the perspectives of Diné (Navajo) people and other interest holders regarding genetic research. To address this gap, this study examines the perspectives of research project leaders with protocols approved by the Navajo Nation Human Research Review Board (NNHRRB) as this group is aware of research expectations and cultural considerations. An online survey was designed to gauge researchers' interest in adding a genetic component to their research if the moratorium were lifted, while also examining potential benefits, risks, and ethical considerations. Survey participants (n=36) included 27% Diné researchers and 73% non-Diné researchers, and 50% of researchers (n=18) had collected human biospecimens in their research (e.g., blood, tissue). Our results indicate that if the moratorium on genetic research ended, 42% of researchers (n=15) would be unsure about adding a genetic component to their projects, while 31% (n=11) of researchers were interested. Participants were asked to rank ethical considerations related to five broad topics: community engagement; dissemination of results and data; privacy and rights; health, safety, and equity; and discrimination and mistrust. Participants ranked "ensure that no research participants are harmed" and "give presentations to the community" as very important whereas "sharing data with other researchers" was of low importance. We provide valuable perspectives to guide potential genetic policy development for the Navajo Nation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HGG Advances
HGG Advances Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信