临床缓解的炎症性肠病患者静脉注射到皮下切换的多中心西班牙研究

IF 4 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Beatriz Gros, Noemí Manceñido, José Manuel Benítez, Jordi Guardiola, Inmaculada Alonso Abreu, Iago Rodríguez-Lago, Rubén Alvarado, Ángel Ponferrada Díaz, Federico Argüelles, G Esther Rodríguez, Francisco Mesonero Gismero, Iván Guerra, Marisa Iborra, Pere Borrás, Fiorella Cañete, Lucía Madero Velázquez, Jesús Castro Poceiro, Antonio M Caballero-Mateos, Manuel Barreiro de Acosta, José María Huguet, Beatriz Castro Senosain, Eduard Brunet, Francisco López Romero-Salazar, Berta Caballol, Carles Suria, Erika Alfambra, Laura García García, Judit Orobitg, Sandra Marín Pedrosa, Pilar Soto Escribano, Yamile Zabana, Ana Gutiérrez, Eva Iglesias Flores
{"title":"临床缓解的炎症性肠病患者静脉注射到皮下切换的多中心西班牙研究","authors":"Beatriz Gros, Noemí Manceñido, José Manuel Benítez, Jordi Guardiola, Inmaculada Alonso Abreu, Iago Rodríguez-Lago, Rubén Alvarado, Ángel Ponferrada Díaz, Federico Argüelles, G Esther Rodríguez, Francisco Mesonero Gismero, Iván Guerra, Marisa Iborra, Pere Borrás, Fiorella Cañete, Lucía Madero Velázquez, Jesús Castro Poceiro, Antonio M Caballero-Mateos, Manuel Barreiro de Acosta, José María Huguet, Beatriz Castro Senosain, Eduard Brunet, Francisco López Romero-Salazar, Berta Caballol, Carles Suria, Erika Alfambra, Laura García García, Judit Orobitg, Sandra Marín Pedrosa, Pilar Soto Escribano, Yamile Zabana, Ana Gutiérrez, Eva Iglesias Flores","doi":"10.17235/reed.2025.11525/2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Despite the established use of intravenous (IV) vedolizumab for treating inflammatory bowel disease, there's growing interest in exploring the advantages of the novel subcutaneous (SC) route. However, comprehensive real-world evidence regarding the extended safety and effectiveness of it remains scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IBD patients on IV vedolizumab treatment across 24 Spanish hospitals who were in clinical remission were given the option to transition to SC injections where this formulation was available or to remain on IV, while those in centers without access to SC vedolizumab remained on IV therapy. Data encompassing clinical disease activity, biochemical markers, adverse events, treatment persistence, and disease-related outcomes were retrospectively gathered from prospectively maintained clinical records at baseline, and at weeks 12, 24, and 48.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 207 patients, with 23 excluded due to not being in clinical remission, resulting in a final inclusion of 184 patients. Of these, 53 (28.8%) remained on IV vedolizumab, while 131 (71.2%) transitioned to SC. There were 108 (58.7%) patients with ulcerative colitis and 76 (41.3%) with Crohn's disease. Both groups exhibited comparable demographic characteristics except for Crohn's disease behavior: non-inflammatory non-stricturing pattern (B1 Montreal classification) that was predominant among patients who transitioned to the SC (p=0.023). No differences were observed in drug persistence (log rank test p=0.82). Clinical, biochemical and fecal calprotectin remission at the different time-points were comparable at each time point with the exemption of clinical remission at week 12 favoring SC over IV. Drug intensification occurred in 24.5% of the patients on IV versus none on SC, p<0.0001. Safety was consistent with previously reported with no differences among groups 13 (8%) SC and IV 1 (2.1%), p=0.059; and most of them being mild in nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transitioning from IV to SC vedolizumab in patients with IBD in remission showed comparable effectiveness in maintaining disease remission and persistence. Patients on IV are more likely to need drug intensification during follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":21342,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter Spanish study on vedolizumab intravenous to subcutaneous switch in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in clinical remission.\",\"authors\":\"Beatriz Gros, Noemí Manceñido, José Manuel Benítez, Jordi Guardiola, Inmaculada Alonso Abreu, Iago Rodríguez-Lago, Rubén Alvarado, Ángel Ponferrada Díaz, Federico Argüelles, G Esther Rodríguez, Francisco Mesonero Gismero, Iván Guerra, Marisa Iborra, Pere Borrás, Fiorella Cañete, Lucía Madero Velázquez, Jesús Castro Poceiro, Antonio M Caballero-Mateos, Manuel Barreiro de Acosta, José María Huguet, Beatriz Castro Senosain, Eduard Brunet, Francisco López Romero-Salazar, Berta Caballol, Carles Suria, Erika Alfambra, Laura García García, Judit Orobitg, Sandra Marín Pedrosa, Pilar Soto Escribano, Yamile Zabana, Ana Gutiérrez, Eva Iglesias Flores\",\"doi\":\"10.17235/reed.2025.11525/2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Despite the established use of intravenous (IV) vedolizumab for treating inflammatory bowel disease, there's growing interest in exploring the advantages of the novel subcutaneous (SC) route. However, comprehensive real-world evidence regarding the extended safety and effectiveness of it remains scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IBD patients on IV vedolizumab treatment across 24 Spanish hospitals who were in clinical remission were given the option to transition to SC injections where this formulation was available or to remain on IV, while those in centers without access to SC vedolizumab remained on IV therapy. Data encompassing clinical disease activity, biochemical markers, adverse events, treatment persistence, and disease-related outcomes were retrospectively gathered from prospectively maintained clinical records at baseline, and at weeks 12, 24, and 48.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 207 patients, with 23 excluded due to not being in clinical remission, resulting in a final inclusion of 184 patients. Of these, 53 (28.8%) remained on IV vedolizumab, while 131 (71.2%) transitioned to SC. There were 108 (58.7%) patients with ulcerative colitis and 76 (41.3%) with Crohn's disease. Both groups exhibited comparable demographic characteristics except for Crohn's disease behavior: non-inflammatory non-stricturing pattern (B1 Montreal classification) that was predominant among patients who transitioned to the SC (p=0.023). No differences were observed in drug persistence (log rank test p=0.82). Clinical, biochemical and fecal calprotectin remission at the different time-points were comparable at each time point with the exemption of clinical remission at week 12 favoring SC over IV. Drug intensification occurred in 24.5% of the patients on IV versus none on SC, p<0.0001. Safety was consistent with previously reported with no differences among groups 13 (8%) SC and IV 1 (2.1%), p=0.059; and most of them being mild in nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transitioning from IV to SC vedolizumab in patients with IBD in remission showed comparable effectiveness in maintaining disease remission and persistence. Patients on IV are more likely to need drug intensification during follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2025.11525/2025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2025.11525/2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:尽管静脉注射(IV) vedolizumab用于治疗炎症性肠病,但人们对探索新型皮下(SC)途径的优势越来越感兴趣。然而,关于它的安全性和有效性的全面的现实证据仍然很少。方法:在24家西班牙医院接受静脉注射维多珠单抗治疗的IBD患者处于临床缓解期,在该制剂可用的情况下,他们可以选择改用SC注射或继续静脉注射,而在无法获得SC维多珠单抗的中心,他们仍然使用静脉注射。包括临床疾病活动性、生化标志物、不良事件、治疗持续性和疾病相关结果在内的数据回顾性收集自基线、12周、24周和48周的前瞻性临床记录。结果:我们确定了207例患者,其中23例因未达到临床缓解而被排除,最终纳入184例患者。其中,53名(28.8%)患者继续使用静脉注射vedolizumab, 131名(71.2%)患者转为SC。其中108名(58.7%)患者患有溃疡性结肠炎,76名(41.3%)患者患有克罗恩病。除了克罗恩病行为外,两组均表现出相似的人口统计学特征:非炎症性非狭窄模式(B1蒙特利尔分类)在过渡到SC的患者中占主导地位(p=0.023)。两组药物持久性无显著差异(log rank检验p=0.82)。不同时间点的临床、生化和粪便钙保护蛋白缓解在每个时间点具有可比性,第12周的临床缓解豁免有利于SC而不是IV。静脉注射的患者中有24.5%出现药物强化,而SC中没有药物强化。结论:IBD缓解患者从静脉注射过渡到SC维多单抗在维持疾病缓解和持久性方面具有可比性。静脉滴注的患者在随访期间更有可能需要药物强化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicenter Spanish study on vedolizumab intravenous to subcutaneous switch in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in clinical remission.

Background and aims: Despite the established use of intravenous (IV) vedolizumab for treating inflammatory bowel disease, there's growing interest in exploring the advantages of the novel subcutaneous (SC) route. However, comprehensive real-world evidence regarding the extended safety and effectiveness of it remains scarce.

Methods: IBD patients on IV vedolizumab treatment across 24 Spanish hospitals who were in clinical remission were given the option to transition to SC injections where this formulation was available or to remain on IV, while those in centers without access to SC vedolizumab remained on IV therapy. Data encompassing clinical disease activity, biochemical markers, adverse events, treatment persistence, and disease-related outcomes were retrospectively gathered from prospectively maintained clinical records at baseline, and at weeks 12, 24, and 48.

Results: We identified 207 patients, with 23 excluded due to not being in clinical remission, resulting in a final inclusion of 184 patients. Of these, 53 (28.8%) remained on IV vedolizumab, while 131 (71.2%) transitioned to SC. There were 108 (58.7%) patients with ulcerative colitis and 76 (41.3%) with Crohn's disease. Both groups exhibited comparable demographic characteristics except for Crohn's disease behavior: non-inflammatory non-stricturing pattern (B1 Montreal classification) that was predominant among patients who transitioned to the SC (p=0.023). No differences were observed in drug persistence (log rank test p=0.82). Clinical, biochemical and fecal calprotectin remission at the different time-points were comparable at each time point with the exemption of clinical remission at week 12 favoring SC over IV. Drug intensification occurred in 24.5% of the patients on IV versus none on SC, p<0.0001. Safety was consistent with previously reported with no differences among groups 13 (8%) SC and IV 1 (2.1%), p=0.059; and most of them being mild in nature.

Conclusions: Transitioning from IV to SC vedolizumab in patients with IBD in remission showed comparable effectiveness in maintaining disease remission and persistence. Patients on IV are more likely to need drug intensification during follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
400
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, Órgano Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD), Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva (SEED) y Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva (AEED), publica artículos originales, editoriales, revisiones, casos clínicos, cartas al director, imágenes en patología digestiva, y otros artículos especiales sobre todos los aspectos relativos a las enfermedades digestivas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信