挑战金标准:内窥镜诊断门静脉窦前高压。

IF 4 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sofia Bragança, Pooja Khonde, Stephen D Zucker's, Marvin Ryou
{"title":"挑战金标准:内窥镜诊断门静脉窦前高压。","authors":"Sofia Bragança, Pooja Khonde, Stephen D Zucker's, Marvin Ryou","doi":"10.17235/reed.2025.11480/2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report a 52-year-old patient referred for evaluation of abnormal liver tests, with extensive etiological workup negative. Abdominal CT and MRI revealed hypertrophy of the left hepatic lobe, nodular liver contours, and ascites (SAAG 1.7; total protein 1.8 g/dL). Upper endoscopy showed no stigmata of portal hypertension. A dual interventional radiology procedure was performed. Transjugular liver biopsy (LB) (18G) was non-diagnostic, and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was normal (HVPG 3 mmHg; wedged hepatic venous pressure [WHVP] 13 mmHg; free hepatic venous pressure [FHRVP] 10 mmHg). Given suspicion of pre-sinusoidal portal hypertension, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was performed (Arietta 850, Fujifilm Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan). EUS showed blunting of the left lobe tip, irregular contours, and ascites. Endoscopic \"palpation\" revealed an indentation of 2.0 mm (abnormal). Shear-wave-elastography (SWE) of the left lobe was normal at 6.04 kPa, but other areas showed 10.5-11.1 kPa (abnormal). No splenomegaly, but the mean SWE was 31.9 kPa (abnormal). EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG), measured with EchoTip Insight™ FNB needle (Cook Medical, USA), was elevated (PPG 8 mmHg; mean hepatic vein pressure 4.0 mmHg; mean portal vein pressure [PVP] 12.0 mmHg). Targeted EUS-guided biopsy of the left lobe (Acquire™ 19G FNB needle, Boston Scientific, USA) showed vague liver nodular transformation with alternating regenerative and atrophic hepatocytes, consistent with nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH). Due to refractory ascites, TIPS placement was proposed. Pre-TIPS evaluation showed mildly elevated HVPG (6 mmHg), while immediate post-TIPS assessment revealed elevated HVPG (HVPG 11 mmHg; PVP 20 mmHg; FHRVP 9 mmHg). Ascites was controlled with TIPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":21342,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","volume":"120 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging the gold standard: endohepatology in the diagnosis of presinusoidal portal hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Bragança, Pooja Khonde, Stephen D Zucker's, Marvin Ryou\",\"doi\":\"10.17235/reed.2025.11480/2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We report a 52-year-old patient referred for evaluation of abnormal liver tests, with extensive etiological workup negative. Abdominal CT and MRI revealed hypertrophy of the left hepatic lobe, nodular liver contours, and ascites (SAAG 1.7; total protein 1.8 g/dL). Upper endoscopy showed no stigmata of portal hypertension. A dual interventional radiology procedure was performed. Transjugular liver biopsy (LB) (18G) was non-diagnostic, and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was normal (HVPG 3 mmHg; wedged hepatic venous pressure [WHVP] 13 mmHg; free hepatic venous pressure [FHRVP] 10 mmHg). Given suspicion of pre-sinusoidal portal hypertension, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was performed (Arietta 850, Fujifilm Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan). EUS showed blunting of the left lobe tip, irregular contours, and ascites. Endoscopic \\\"palpation\\\" revealed an indentation of 2.0 mm (abnormal). Shear-wave-elastography (SWE) of the left lobe was normal at 6.04 kPa, but other areas showed 10.5-11.1 kPa (abnormal). No splenomegaly, but the mean SWE was 31.9 kPa (abnormal). EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG), measured with EchoTip Insight™ FNB needle (Cook Medical, USA), was elevated (PPG 8 mmHg; mean hepatic vein pressure 4.0 mmHg; mean portal vein pressure [PVP] 12.0 mmHg). Targeted EUS-guided biopsy of the left lobe (Acquire™ 19G FNB needle, Boston Scientific, USA) showed vague liver nodular transformation with alternating regenerative and atrophic hepatocytes, consistent with nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH). Due to refractory ascites, TIPS placement was proposed. Pre-TIPS evaluation showed mildly elevated HVPG (6 mmHg), while immediate post-TIPS assessment revealed elevated HVPG (HVPG 11 mmHg; PVP 20 mmHg; FHRVP 9 mmHg). Ascites was controlled with TIPS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas\",\"volume\":\"120 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2025.11480/2025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2025.11480/2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们报告一名52岁的患者,因肝脏检查异常而被转诊,病因检查呈阴性。腹部CT和MRI显示左肝叶肥大,肝脏结节状轮廓,腹水(SAAG 1.7;总蛋白1.8 g/dL)。上腔镜检查未见门静脉高压征。行双介入放射检查。经颈静脉肝活检(LB) (18G)无诊断,肝静脉压梯度(HVPG)正常(HVPG 3 mmHg;楔形肝静脉压[WHVP] 13 mmHg;游离肝静脉压[FHRVP] 10 mmHg)。鉴于怀疑窦前门静脉高压症,行内镜超声检查(Arietta 850, Fujifilm Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan)。EUS显示左叶尖端钝化,轮廓不规则,腹水。内窥镜“触诊”显示2.0 mm的压痕(异常)。左肺叶剪切波弹性成像(SWE)在6.04 kPa时正常,其他部位为10.5-11.1 kPa异常。脾未肿大,但平均SWE为31.9 kPa(异常)。使用EchoTip Insight™FNB针(Cook Medical, USA)测量eus引导门静脉压力梯度(EUS-PPG)升高(PPG 8 mmHg;平均肝静脉压力4.0 mmHg;平均门静脉压力[PVP] 12.0 mmHg)。eus引导下的左肝活检(Acquire™19G FNB针,Boston Scientific, USA)显示模糊的肝结节转化为再生和萎缩肝细胞交替,与结节再生增生(NRH)一致。由于难治性腹水,建议放置TIPS。tips前评估显示HVPG轻度升高(6 mmHg),而tips后评估显示HVPG升高(HVPG 11 mmHg, PVP 20 mmHg, FHRVP 9 mmHg)。腹水用TIPS控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenging the gold standard: endohepatology in the diagnosis of presinusoidal portal hypertension.

We report a 52-year-old patient referred for evaluation of abnormal liver tests, with extensive etiological workup negative. Abdominal CT and MRI revealed hypertrophy of the left hepatic lobe, nodular liver contours, and ascites (SAAG 1.7; total protein 1.8 g/dL). Upper endoscopy showed no stigmata of portal hypertension. A dual interventional radiology procedure was performed. Transjugular liver biopsy (LB) (18G) was non-diagnostic, and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was normal (HVPG 3 mmHg; wedged hepatic venous pressure [WHVP] 13 mmHg; free hepatic venous pressure [FHRVP] 10 mmHg). Given suspicion of pre-sinusoidal portal hypertension, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was performed (Arietta 850, Fujifilm Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan). EUS showed blunting of the left lobe tip, irregular contours, and ascites. Endoscopic "palpation" revealed an indentation of 2.0 mm (abnormal). Shear-wave-elastography (SWE) of the left lobe was normal at 6.04 kPa, but other areas showed 10.5-11.1 kPa (abnormal). No splenomegaly, but the mean SWE was 31.9 kPa (abnormal). EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG), measured with EchoTip Insight™ FNB needle (Cook Medical, USA), was elevated (PPG 8 mmHg; mean hepatic vein pressure 4.0 mmHg; mean portal vein pressure [PVP] 12.0 mmHg). Targeted EUS-guided biopsy of the left lobe (Acquire™ 19G FNB needle, Boston Scientific, USA) showed vague liver nodular transformation with alternating regenerative and atrophic hepatocytes, consistent with nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH). Due to refractory ascites, TIPS placement was proposed. Pre-TIPS evaluation showed mildly elevated HVPG (6 mmHg), while immediate post-TIPS assessment revealed elevated HVPG (HVPG 11 mmHg; PVP 20 mmHg; FHRVP 9 mmHg). Ascites was controlled with TIPS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
400
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, Órgano Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD), Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva (SEED) y Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva (AEED), publica artículos originales, editoriales, revisiones, casos clínicos, cartas al director, imágenes en patología digestiva, y otros artículos especiales sobre todos los aspectos relativos a las enfermedades digestivas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信