健康青年在水上和陆上运动期间的呼吸调节和肺容量。

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Daisuke Hoshi, Marina Fukuie, Tsubasa Tomoto, Wenxing Qin, Takashi Tarumi, Jun Sugawara, Koichi Watanabe
{"title":"健康青年在水上和陆上运动期间的呼吸调节和肺容量。","authors":"Daisuke Hoshi, Marina Fukuie, Tsubasa Tomoto, Wenxing Qin, Takashi Tarumi, Jun Sugawara, Koichi Watanabe","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elevated hydrostatic pressure during water immersion reduces lung volume and compliance at rest. These alterations may persist during exercise, influencing both the respiratory regulation and lung volume. This study compared respiratory regulation and lung volume between land-based (LC) and aquatic (AC) cycling matched for oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>). Ten healthy young adults underwent cycling at low and moderate intensities in both environments. Expiratory gas variables (VO<sub>2</sub>) and respiratory variables (minute ventilation and respiratory rate: V<sub>E</sub> and RR, respectively) were continuously measured using a breath-by-breath gas analyzer system. Ventilatory equivalent for VO<sub>2</sub> (V<sub>E</sub>/VO<sub>2</sub>) was calculated. Using a spirometry system, expiratory and inspiratory reserve volumes (ERV and IRV, respectively), and tidal volume (V<sub>T</sub>) were measured at rest and at each exercise intensity using inspiratory maneuvers and normalized to forced vital capacity (FVC). Although VO<sub>2</sub> was matched between conditions (p > 0.05), AC resulted in significantly higher V<sub>E</sub>, RR, and consequently V<sub>E</sub>/VO<sub>2</sub> at moderate intensity. Additionally, ERV was lower and IRV was higher during AC compared with LC across all intensities, while FVCs remained unchanged in both conditions. These findings suggest a potential mechanism by which exercise in an aquatic environment may be more effective than land-based exercise for training the respiratory system.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 19","pages":"e70564"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory regulation and lung volume during aquatic and land-based exercise in healthy Young adults.\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Hoshi, Marina Fukuie, Tsubasa Tomoto, Wenxing Qin, Takashi Tarumi, Jun Sugawara, Koichi Watanabe\",\"doi\":\"10.14814/phy2.70564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Elevated hydrostatic pressure during water immersion reduces lung volume and compliance at rest. These alterations may persist during exercise, influencing both the respiratory regulation and lung volume. This study compared respiratory regulation and lung volume between land-based (LC) and aquatic (AC) cycling matched for oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>). Ten healthy young adults underwent cycling at low and moderate intensities in both environments. Expiratory gas variables (VO<sub>2</sub>) and respiratory variables (minute ventilation and respiratory rate: V<sub>E</sub> and RR, respectively) were continuously measured using a breath-by-breath gas analyzer system. Ventilatory equivalent for VO<sub>2</sub> (V<sub>E</sub>/VO<sub>2</sub>) was calculated. Using a spirometry system, expiratory and inspiratory reserve volumes (ERV and IRV, respectively), and tidal volume (V<sub>T</sub>) were measured at rest and at each exercise intensity using inspiratory maneuvers and normalized to forced vital capacity (FVC). Although VO<sub>2</sub> was matched between conditions (p > 0.05), AC resulted in significantly higher V<sub>E</sub>, RR, and consequently V<sub>E</sub>/VO<sub>2</sub> at moderate intensity. Additionally, ERV was lower and IRV was higher during AC compared with LC across all intensities, while FVCs remained unchanged in both conditions. These findings suggest a potential mechanism by which exercise in an aquatic environment may be more effective than land-based exercise for training the respiratory system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"volume\":\"13 19\",\"pages\":\"e70564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477437/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水浸时静水压力升高会减少肺体积和休息时的顺应性。这些改变可能在运动过程中持续存在,影响呼吸调节和肺容量。本研究比较了陆地(LC)和水生(AC)循环与氧摄取(VO2)匹配的呼吸调节和肺容量。在两种环境下,10名健康的年轻人分别进行了低强度和中等强度的自行车运动。使用逐呼吸气体分析仪系统连续测量呼气气体变量(VO2)和呼吸变量(分别为分钟通气量和呼吸速率:VE和RR)。计算通风当量VO2 (VE/VO2)。使用肺活量测定系统,分别测量静息时和每次吸气运动强度下的呼气和吸气储备体积(ERV和IRV)和潮气量(VT),并将其归一化为用力肺活量(FVC)。虽然VO2在不同条件下是匹配的(p > 0.05),但在中等强度下,AC导致VE、RR和VE/VO2显著升高。此外,与LC相比,在所有强度下,AC期间的ERV较低,IRV较高,而两种情况下的fvc保持不变。这些发现提示了一种潜在的机制,通过这种机制,在水生环境中运动可能比在陆地上运动更有效地训练呼吸系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Respiratory regulation and lung volume during aquatic and land-based exercise in healthy Young adults.

Elevated hydrostatic pressure during water immersion reduces lung volume and compliance at rest. These alterations may persist during exercise, influencing both the respiratory regulation and lung volume. This study compared respiratory regulation and lung volume between land-based (LC) and aquatic (AC) cycling matched for oxygen uptake (VO2). Ten healthy young adults underwent cycling at low and moderate intensities in both environments. Expiratory gas variables (VO2) and respiratory variables (minute ventilation and respiratory rate: VE and RR, respectively) were continuously measured using a breath-by-breath gas analyzer system. Ventilatory equivalent for VO2 (VE/VO2) was calculated. Using a spirometry system, expiratory and inspiratory reserve volumes (ERV and IRV, respectively), and tidal volume (VT) were measured at rest and at each exercise intensity using inspiratory maneuvers and normalized to forced vital capacity (FVC). Although VO2 was matched between conditions (p > 0.05), AC resulted in significantly higher VE, RR, and consequently VE/VO2 at moderate intensity. Additionally, ERV was lower and IRV was higher during AC compared with LC across all intensities, while FVCs remained unchanged in both conditions. These findings suggest a potential mechanism by which exercise in an aquatic environment may be more effective than land-based exercise for training the respiratory system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信