感染COVID的波兰护士和助产士的压力管理策略和控制情绪:横断面研究

IF 2.4 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PeerJ Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.19816
Barbara Zych, Anna Kremska, Anna Lewandowska, Małgorzata Nagórska
{"title":"感染COVID的波兰护士和助产士的压力管理策略和控制情绪:横断面研究","authors":"Barbara Zych, Anna Kremska, Anna Lewandowska, Małgorzata Nagórska","doi":"10.7717/peerj.19816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stress management strategies and the ability of nursing staff to control their emotions is an important way to reduce emotional tension in a difficult situation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify the dominant stress management strategy and emotion control modality in professionally active nurses and midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 137 nursing personnel from south-eastern Poland were studied. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected with a questionnaire developed by the authors, stress management was assessed with the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS), and control of emotions was examined with the Courtauld Emotional Control Scale (CECS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common strategy for stress management strategy among nursing staff was the task-oriented strategy, the least frequently used was the avoidance. Only the avoidance style showed a significant difference in the group of midwives taking the form of seeking social contact (<i>p</i> = 0.016). CECS in none of the subcategories showed a significant difference for the profession. It turned out that the longer the time elapsed in nursing staff from having contracted COVID-19, the less often they chose the avoidance oriented coping (<i>p</i> = 0.022), and the presence of more post-COVID complications favoured focusing on emotions (<i>p</i> = 0.016) and avoidance (<i>p</i> = 0.005) in the form of initiating social contacts (<i>p</i> = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tendency to prefer a maladaptive style of coping with stress and suppression of emotions in nursing staff is associated with the risk of psychosomatic diseases and occupational burnout. The results indicate the necessity of providing interprofessional support combined with learning to \"actively cope\" with stress at work.</p>","PeriodicalId":19799,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ","volume":"13 ","pages":"e19816"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress management strategies and controlling emotion among Polish nurses and midwives who suffer COVID: cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Zych, Anna Kremska, Anna Lewandowska, Małgorzata Nagórska\",\"doi\":\"10.7717/peerj.19816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stress management strategies and the ability of nursing staff to control their emotions is an important way to reduce emotional tension in a difficult situation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify the dominant stress management strategy and emotion control modality in professionally active nurses and midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 137 nursing personnel from south-eastern Poland were studied. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected with a questionnaire developed by the authors, stress management was assessed with the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS), and control of emotions was examined with the Courtauld Emotional Control Scale (CECS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common strategy for stress management strategy among nursing staff was the task-oriented strategy, the least frequently used was the avoidance. Only the avoidance style showed a significant difference in the group of midwives taking the form of seeking social contact (<i>p</i> = 0.016). CECS in none of the subcategories showed a significant difference for the profession. It turned out that the longer the time elapsed in nursing staff from having contracted COVID-19, the less often they chose the avoidance oriented coping (<i>p</i> = 0.022), and the presence of more post-COVID complications favoured focusing on emotions (<i>p</i> = 0.016) and avoidance (<i>p</i> = 0.005) in the form of initiating social contacts (<i>p</i> = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tendency to prefer a maladaptive style of coping with stress and suppression of emotions in nursing staff is associated with the risk of psychosomatic diseases and occupational burnout. The results indicate the necessity of providing interprofessional support combined with learning to \\\"actively cope\\\" with stress at work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PeerJ\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"e19816\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PeerJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19816\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19816","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:压力管理策略和护理人员控制情绪的能力是减轻困难情况下情绪紧张的重要途径。目的:了解COVID-19大流行期间专业活跃护士和助产士的主要压力管理策略和情绪控制方式。材料与方法:对来自波兰东南部的137名护理人员进行研究。采用自制问卷收集社会人口学和临床数据,采用压力情境应对量表(CISS)评估压力管理,采用考陶德情绪控制量表(CECS)检查情绪控制。结果:护理人员最常用的压力管理策略是任务导向策略,最不常用的是回避策略。只有回避方式在寻求社交方式组中有显著差异(p = 0.016)。各亚类的CECS在各专业间均无显著差异。结果表明,护理人员感染COVID-19的时间越长,他们选择回避型应对的频率越低(p = 0.022),更多的covid后并发症的存在有利于关注情绪(p = 0.016)和回避(p = 0.005),以发起社会接触的形式(p = 0.003)。结论:护理人员倾向于采用适应不良的应激和情绪抑制方式与心身疾病和职业倦怠风险相关。结果表明,提供跨专业支持与学习相结合的必要性,以“积极应对”工作压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Stress management strategies and controlling emotion among Polish nurses and midwives who suffer COVID: cross-sectional study.

Stress management strategies and controlling emotion among Polish nurses and midwives who suffer COVID: cross-sectional study.

Stress management strategies and controlling emotion among Polish nurses and midwives who suffer COVID: cross-sectional study.

Stress management strategies and controlling emotion among Polish nurses and midwives who suffer COVID: cross-sectional study.

Introduction: Stress management strategies and the ability of nursing staff to control their emotions is an important way to reduce emotional tension in a difficult situation.

Aim: To identify the dominant stress management strategy and emotion control modality in professionally active nurses and midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Material and methods: A total of 137 nursing personnel from south-eastern Poland were studied. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected with a questionnaire developed by the authors, stress management was assessed with the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS), and control of emotions was examined with the Courtauld Emotional Control Scale (CECS).

Results: The most common strategy for stress management strategy among nursing staff was the task-oriented strategy, the least frequently used was the avoidance. Only the avoidance style showed a significant difference in the group of midwives taking the form of seeking social contact (p = 0.016). CECS in none of the subcategories showed a significant difference for the profession. It turned out that the longer the time elapsed in nursing staff from having contracted COVID-19, the less often they chose the avoidance oriented coping (p = 0.022), and the presence of more post-COVID complications favoured focusing on emotions (p = 0.016) and avoidance (p = 0.005) in the form of initiating social contacts (p = 0.003).

Conclusions: The tendency to prefer a maladaptive style of coping with stress and suppression of emotions in nursing staff is associated with the risk of psychosomatic diseases and occupational burnout. The results indicate the necessity of providing interprofessional support combined with learning to "actively cope" with stress at work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PeerJ
PeerJ MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1665
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信