鼻高流量治疗持续时间对极早产儿呼吸结局的影响:倾向评分分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Emanuela Zannin, Camilla Rigotti, Giulia Dognini, Danila Azzolina, Maria Luisa Ventura
{"title":"鼻高流量治疗持续时间对极早产儿呼吸结局的影响:倾向评分分析。","authors":"Emanuela Zannin, Camilla Rigotti, Giulia Dognini, Danila Azzolina, Maria Luisa Ventura","doi":"10.1002/ppul.71313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nasal high flow therapy (nHFT) is being used earlier and for longer than in the past as an alternative to nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) for preterm neonates. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the proportion of nHFT on respiratory outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre retrospective study of preterm infants born <32 weeks' gestational age from 2016 to 2025. Propensity score weighting analysis was used to explore the effect of the duration of nHFT expressed as a percentage of the total duration of nHFT or nCPAP (nHFT%). The primary outcome was the total duration of respiratory support; secondary outcomes were the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and the length of hospitalisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and forty two infants were included. Infants received nHFT for a median (Q1, Q3) of 70 (46, 85) % of the duration of nHFT or nCPAP (nHFT%). After adjusting for residual confounders, the weighted nHFT% presented a significant positive association with the total duration of respiratory support (β = 0.007, p < 0.001), oxygen requirement (β = 0.006, p = 0.027), and the length of hospitalisation (β = 0.002, p = 0.007). The risk for BPD tended to increase with increasing nHFT% (OR = 1.01, p = 0.287).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prolonged use of nHFT as an alternative to nCPAP was associated with a longer duration of respiratory support and hospitalisation, but not with a higher risk for BPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"60 9","pages":"e71313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Duration of Nasal High Flow Therapy on Respiratory Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants: A Propensity Score Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Emanuela Zannin, Camilla Rigotti, Giulia Dognini, Danila Azzolina, Maria Luisa Ventura\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ppul.71313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nasal high flow therapy (nHFT) is being used earlier and for longer than in the past as an alternative to nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) for preterm neonates. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the proportion of nHFT on respiratory outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre retrospective study of preterm infants born <32 weeks' gestational age from 2016 to 2025. Propensity score weighting analysis was used to explore the effect of the duration of nHFT expressed as a percentage of the total duration of nHFT or nCPAP (nHFT%). The primary outcome was the total duration of respiratory support; secondary outcomes were the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and the length of hospitalisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and forty two infants were included. Infants received nHFT for a median (Q1, Q3) of 70 (46, 85) % of the duration of nHFT or nCPAP (nHFT%). After adjusting for residual confounders, the weighted nHFT% presented a significant positive association with the total duration of respiratory support (β = 0.007, p < 0.001), oxygen requirement (β = 0.006, p = 0.027), and the length of hospitalisation (β = 0.002, p = 0.007). The risk for BPD tended to increase with increasing nHFT% (OR = 1.01, p = 0.287).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prolonged use of nHFT as an alternative to nCPAP was associated with a longer duration of respiratory support and hospitalisation, but not with a higher risk for BPD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\"60 9\",\"pages\":\"e71313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71313\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71313","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鼻高流量治疗(nHFT)作为鼻部持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)治疗早产儿的替代方法,比过去使用得更早,使用时间更长。本研究的目的是评估nHFT比例对呼吸结果的影响。方法:这是一项早产儿的单中心回顾性研究。结果:纳入了342名婴儿。婴儿接受nHFT的中位数(第一季度,第三季度)为nHFT或nCPAP持续时间的70% (46.85)% (nHFT%)。在调整了残留混杂因素后,加权nHFT%与呼吸支持总持续时间呈显著正相关(β = 0.007, p)。结论:长期使用nHFT替代nCPAP与更长的呼吸支持持续时间和住院时间相关,但与BPD的高风险无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Duration of Nasal High Flow Therapy on Respiratory Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Background: Nasal high flow therapy (nHFT) is being used earlier and for longer than in the past as an alternative to nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) for preterm neonates. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the proportion of nHFT on respiratory outcomes.

Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective study of preterm infants born <32 weeks' gestational age from 2016 to 2025. Propensity score weighting analysis was used to explore the effect of the duration of nHFT expressed as a percentage of the total duration of nHFT or nCPAP (nHFT%). The primary outcome was the total duration of respiratory support; secondary outcomes were the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and the length of hospitalisation.

Results: Three hundred and forty two infants were included. Infants received nHFT for a median (Q1, Q3) of 70 (46, 85) % of the duration of nHFT or nCPAP (nHFT%). After adjusting for residual confounders, the weighted nHFT% presented a significant positive association with the total duration of respiratory support (β = 0.007, p < 0.001), oxygen requirement (β = 0.006, p = 0.027), and the length of hospitalisation (β = 0.002, p = 0.007). The risk for BPD tended to increase with increasing nHFT% (OR = 1.01, p = 0.287).

Conclusion: The prolonged use of nHFT as an alternative to nCPAP was associated with a longer duration of respiratory support and hospitalisation, but not with a higher risk for BPD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信