评估男性胎儿外生殖器形态:超声技术和规范价值的系统回顾。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Nikit Venishetty, Akash Chauhan, Ishant Goel, Jonathan Balderrama, Maral Demirjian, Lorna Kwan, Ilina D Pluym, Renea Sturm
{"title":"评估男性胎儿外生殖器形态:超声技术和规范价值的系统回顾。","authors":"Nikit Venishetty, Akash Chauhan, Ishant Goel, Jonathan Balderrama, Maral Demirjian, Lorna Kwan, Ilina D Pluym, Renea Sturm","doi":"10.1002/jum.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although commonly evaluated, fetal ultrasound assessments of penile length, width, and anogenital distance (AGD) lack standardized measurement techniques. This systematic review aimed to evaluate variability in measurement methods and generate normative growth curves for externally virilized genital development. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting sonographic measurements of fetal penile length, width, or AGD by gestational age. Exclusion criteria included abnormal genitourinary development, intrauterine growth restriction, non-ultrasound imaging modalities, and non-English publications. Manuscripts were analyzed by a minimum of three reviewers. Data were standardized to mean dimensions and 95% confidence intervals by gestational week. Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Six measured penile length (scrotum to tip), four measured width (widest penile region), and three evaluated AGD (scrotum to anus). Resulting regression equations were y = 0.7862x - 8.4627 (length), y = 0.4209x - 3.1445 (width), and y = 1.0129x - 11.239 (AGD). Quality assessments revealed only 51.97 ± 21.5% of study parameters had a low risk of bias. The resultant growth curves provide a reference for normative development. Standardized assessment protocols and studies of anomalous development are needed to improve measurement consistency and assess the predictive value of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Male Fetal External Genital Morphology: A Systematic Review of Sonographic Techniques and Normative Values.\",\"authors\":\"Nikit Venishetty, Akash Chauhan, Ishant Goel, Jonathan Balderrama, Maral Demirjian, Lorna Kwan, Ilina D Pluym, Renea Sturm\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jum.70051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although commonly evaluated, fetal ultrasound assessments of penile length, width, and anogenital distance (AGD) lack standardized measurement techniques. This systematic review aimed to evaluate variability in measurement methods and generate normative growth curves for externally virilized genital development. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting sonographic measurements of fetal penile length, width, or AGD by gestational age. Exclusion criteria included abnormal genitourinary development, intrauterine growth restriction, non-ultrasound imaging modalities, and non-English publications. Manuscripts were analyzed by a minimum of three reviewers. Data were standardized to mean dimensions and 95% confidence intervals by gestational week. Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Six measured penile length (scrotum to tip), four measured width (widest penile region), and three evaluated AGD (scrotum to anus). Resulting regression equations were y = 0.7862x - 8.4627 (length), y = 0.4209x - 3.1445 (width), and y = 1.0129x - 11.239 (AGD). Quality assessments revealed only 51.97 ± 21.5% of study parameters had a low risk of bias. The resultant growth curves provide a reference for normative development. Standardized assessment protocols and studies of anomalous development are needed to improve measurement consistency and assess the predictive value of these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然通常评估,胎儿超声评估阴茎长度,宽度和肛门生殖器距离(AGD)缺乏标准化的测量技术。本系统综述旨在评估测量方法的可变性,并生成外部男性化生殖器发育的规范性生长曲线。按照PRISMA指南,PubMed、b谷歌Scholar和Web of Science检索了关于胎儿阴茎长度、宽度或AGD按胎龄超声测量的研究报告。排除标准包括泌尿生殖系统发育异常、宫内生长受限、非超声成像方式和非英文出版物。稿件至少由三名审稿人进行分析。数据按妊娠周标准化为平均维度和95%置信区间。9项研究符合纳入标准。6个测量阴茎长度(阴囊到阴茎尖端),4个测量宽度(阴茎最宽区域),3个评估AGD(阴囊到肛门)。得到的回归方程为y = 0.7862x - 8.4627(长度),y = 0.4209x - 3.1445(宽度),y = 1.0129x - 11.239 (AGD)。质量评价显示,只有51.97±21.5%的研究参数具有低偏倚风险。所得的生长曲线为规范发展提供了参考。需要标准化的评估方案和异常发育的研究来提高测量的一致性和评估这些发现的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Male Fetal External Genital Morphology: A Systematic Review of Sonographic Techniques and Normative Values.

Although commonly evaluated, fetal ultrasound assessments of penile length, width, and anogenital distance (AGD) lack standardized measurement techniques. This systematic review aimed to evaluate variability in measurement methods and generate normative growth curves for externally virilized genital development. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting sonographic measurements of fetal penile length, width, or AGD by gestational age. Exclusion criteria included abnormal genitourinary development, intrauterine growth restriction, non-ultrasound imaging modalities, and non-English publications. Manuscripts were analyzed by a minimum of three reviewers. Data were standardized to mean dimensions and 95% confidence intervals by gestational week. Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Six measured penile length (scrotum to tip), four measured width (widest penile region), and three evaluated AGD (scrotum to anus). Resulting regression equations were y = 0.7862x - 8.4627 (length), y = 0.4209x - 3.1445 (width), and y = 1.0129x - 11.239 (AGD). Quality assessments revealed only 51.97 ± 21.5% of study parameters had a low risk of bias. The resultant growth curves provide a reference for normative development. Standardized assessment protocols and studies of anomalous development are needed to improve measurement consistency and assess the predictive value of these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信