用创伤提醒对幸存者“自我触发”动机的混合方法分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Claire M Hotchkin, Benjamin W Bellet, Richard J McNally
{"title":"用创伤提醒对幸存者“自我触发”动机的混合方法分析。","authors":"Claire M Hotchkin, Benjamin W Bellet, Richard J McNally","doi":"10.1002/jts.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many individuals feel compelled to seek reminders of trauma that produce distress outside of a therapeutic context (i.e., \"self-trigger\"). To better understand this behavior, we examined and categorized the motives behind self-triggering by qualitatively analyzing the free responses of 355 participants to the question, \"In your own words, why do you self-trigger?\" In Study 1, researchers determined whether previously identified motives could be reliably coded. In Study 2, a separate group of researchers identified motives inductively, without knowledge of the a priori motives. Most a priori motives were reliably identified in Study 1, and both studies revealed a range of additional motives. Across both studies, the most prevalent motives included determining the meaning of one's traumatic event, self-punishment, and efforts to validate one's identity as a trauma survivor. Validation was consistently associated with more frequent self-triggering, Study 1: δ<sub>Cliff</sub> = -.19, 95% CI [-.35, -.02]; Study 2: δ<sub>Cliff</sub> = -.19, 95% CI [-.32, -.05], whereas the desire to avoid emotional numbness, Study 1: δ<sub>Cliff</sub> = .21, 95% CI [.02, .39], or seek arousal, Study 2: δ<sub>Cliff</sub> = .22, 95% CI [.06, .37], were associated with less frequent self-triggering. Motives categorized as \"unknown\" were also associated with less frequent self-triggering, Study 1: δ<sub>Cliff</sub> = .35, 95% CI [.08, .56]; Study 2 δ<sub>Cliff</sub> = .35, 95% CI [.08, .56]. The findings suggest motives for self-triggering are diverse and may serve different functions-cognitive, interpersonal, moral, physiological, or sexual-depending on the individual, with implications for conceptualizing trauma-related emotional regulation and behavioral responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed-methods analysis of survivors' motives for \\\"self-triggering\\\" with trauma reminders.\",\"authors\":\"Claire M Hotchkin, Benjamin W Bellet, Richard J McNally\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jts.70002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many individuals feel compelled to seek reminders of trauma that produce distress outside of a therapeutic context (i.e., \\\"self-trigger\\\"). To better understand this behavior, we examined and categorized the motives behind self-triggering by qualitatively analyzing the free responses of 355 participants to the question, \\\"In your own words, why do you self-trigger?\\\" In Study 1, researchers determined whether previously identified motives could be reliably coded. In Study 2, a separate group of researchers identified motives inductively, without knowledge of the a priori motives. Most a priori motives were reliably identified in Study 1, and both studies revealed a range of additional motives. Across both studies, the most prevalent motives included determining the meaning of one's traumatic event, self-punishment, and efforts to validate one's identity as a trauma survivor. Validation was consistently associated with more frequent self-triggering, Study 1: δ<sub>Cliff</sub> = -.19, 95% CI [-.35, -.02]; Study 2: δ<sub>Cliff</sub> = -.19, 95% CI [-.32, -.05], whereas the desire to avoid emotional numbness, Study 1: δ<sub>Cliff</sub> = .21, 95% CI [.02, .39], or seek arousal, Study 2: δ<sub>Cliff</sub> = .22, 95% CI [.06, .37], were associated with less frequent self-triggering. Motives categorized as \\\"unknown\\\" were also associated with less frequent self-triggering, Study 1: δ<sub>Cliff</sub> = .35, 95% CI [.08, .56]; Study 2 δ<sub>Cliff</sub> = .35, 95% CI [.08, .56]. The findings suggest motives for self-triggering are diverse and may serve different functions-cognitive, interpersonal, moral, physiological, or sexual-depending on the individual, with implications for conceptualizing trauma-related emotional regulation and behavioral responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of traumatic stress\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of traumatic stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.70002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traumatic stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.70002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多人感到被迫寻找创伤的提醒,在治疗环境之外产生痛苦(即“自我触发”)。为了更好地理解这种行为,我们通过定性分析355名参与者对“用你自己的话来说,你为什么会自我触发?”这个问题的自由回答,检查并分类了自我触发背后的动机。在研究1中,研究人员确定了先前确定的动机是否可以可靠地编码。在研究2中,另一组研究人员在不知道先验动机的情况下归纳地识别动机。大多数先验动机在研究1中被可靠地确定,两项研究都揭示了一系列额外的动机。在这两项研究中,最普遍的动机包括确定一个人的创伤事件的意义,自我惩罚,以及努力验证自己作为创伤幸存者的身份。验证与更频繁的自我触发一致相关,研究1:δCliff = - 0.19, 95% CI [- 0.35, - 0.02];研究2:δCliff = - 0.19, 95% CI[- 0.32, - 0.05],而避免情绪麻木的愿望,研究1:δCliff = 0.21, 95% CI[。02。39]或寻求唤醒,研究2:δCliff = 0.22, 95% CI[。06。[37],与较少的自我触发有关。分类为“未知”的动机也与较少的自我触发相关,研究1:δCliff = 0.35, 95% CI[。08年,56];研究2 δCliff = .35, 95% CI[。08年,56]。研究结果表明,自我触发的动机是多种多样的,可能有不同的功能——认知的、人际的、道德的、生理的或性的——这取决于个体,这意味着将创伤相关的情绪调节和行为反应概念化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A mixed-methods analysis of survivors' motives for "self-triggering" with trauma reminders.

Many individuals feel compelled to seek reminders of trauma that produce distress outside of a therapeutic context (i.e., "self-trigger"). To better understand this behavior, we examined and categorized the motives behind self-triggering by qualitatively analyzing the free responses of 355 participants to the question, "In your own words, why do you self-trigger?" In Study 1, researchers determined whether previously identified motives could be reliably coded. In Study 2, a separate group of researchers identified motives inductively, without knowledge of the a priori motives. Most a priori motives were reliably identified in Study 1, and both studies revealed a range of additional motives. Across both studies, the most prevalent motives included determining the meaning of one's traumatic event, self-punishment, and efforts to validate one's identity as a trauma survivor. Validation was consistently associated with more frequent self-triggering, Study 1: δCliff = -.19, 95% CI [-.35, -.02]; Study 2: δCliff = -.19, 95% CI [-.32, -.05], whereas the desire to avoid emotional numbness, Study 1: δCliff = .21, 95% CI [.02, .39], or seek arousal, Study 2: δCliff = .22, 95% CI [.06, .37], were associated with less frequent self-triggering. Motives categorized as "unknown" were also associated with less frequent self-triggering, Study 1: δCliff = .35, 95% CI [.08, .56]; Study 2 δCliff = .35, 95% CI [.08, .56]. The findings suggest motives for self-triggering are diverse and may serve different functions-cognitive, interpersonal, moral, physiological, or sexual-depending on the individual, with implications for conceptualizing trauma-related emotional regulation and behavioral responses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Journal of Traumatic Stress (JTS) is published for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress , the official publication for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on biopsychosocial aspects of trauma. Papers focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention education/training, and legal and policy concerns. Journal of Traumatic Stress serves as a primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events (directly or through their occupational roles), such as war, disaster, accident, violence or abuse (criminal or familial), hostage-taking, or life-threatening illness. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, review papers, commentaries, and, from time to time, special issues devoted to a single topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信