急诊科戒烟试验:一项随机对照试验的长期随访。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ian Pope, Zuzanna Halicka, Lucy Clark, Susan Stirling, Allan Clark, Caitlin Notley
{"title":"急诊科戒烟试验:一项随机对照试验的长期随访。","authors":"Ian Pope, Zuzanna Halicka, Lucy Clark, Susan Stirling, Allan Clark, Caitlin Notley","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency Departments (EDs) offer a valuable opportunity to deliver smoking cessation interventions. Long-term abstinence confers the maximum health benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults attending UK EDs who currently smoked were randomized to intervention (brief advice, e-cigarette and referral to local stop smoking services) or control (contact details for local stop smoking services). Participants were followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months as part of the main trial. Participants who consented to long term follow-up were also contacted at approximately 18 months post randomization. For an \"all participants\" analysis those who did not consent to long-term follow-up had their smoking status set at the value of the 6 month outcome. Those who did not respond were assumed to be smoking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Long-term follow-up occurred between 14 and 22 months, mean = 18 months. Long term follow-up for those who consented to this was 35% in the intervention group (n = 145) and 34% in the control group (n = 143). For those who consented to long term follow-up self-reported 7-day abstinence at 18 months was 12.8% in the intervention group (n = 53) and 8.33% in the control group (n = 35) (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.04-2.32, p=.031). For all participants self-reported 7-day abstinence at long term follow-up was 13.8% in the intervention group (n = 67) and 8.6% in the control group (n = 42) (RR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.12-2.31, p=.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adults who smoke attending the ED who received a smoking cessation intervention were significantly more likely to report abstinence 18 months after randomization.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Emergency Departments should be considered as a location for smoking cessation interventions in order to increase long term abstinence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department (COSTED): Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ian Pope, Zuzanna Halicka, Lucy Clark, Susan Stirling, Allan Clark, Caitlin Notley\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntaf200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency Departments (EDs) offer a valuable opportunity to deliver smoking cessation interventions. Long-term abstinence confers the maximum health benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults attending UK EDs who currently smoked were randomized to intervention (brief advice, e-cigarette and referral to local stop smoking services) or control (contact details for local stop smoking services). Participants were followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months as part of the main trial. Participants who consented to long term follow-up were also contacted at approximately 18 months post randomization. For an \\\"all participants\\\" analysis those who did not consent to long-term follow-up had their smoking status set at the value of the 6 month outcome. Those who did not respond were assumed to be smoking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Long-term follow-up occurred between 14 and 22 months, mean = 18 months. Long term follow-up for those who consented to this was 35% in the intervention group (n = 145) and 34% in the control group (n = 143). For those who consented to long term follow-up self-reported 7-day abstinence at 18 months was 12.8% in the intervention group (n = 53) and 8.33% in the control group (n = 35) (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.04-2.32, p=.031). For all participants self-reported 7-day abstinence at long term follow-up was 13.8% in the intervention group (n = 67) and 8.6% in the control group (n = 42) (RR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.12-2.31, p=.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adults who smoke attending the ED who received a smoking cessation intervention were significantly more likely to report abstinence 18 months after randomization.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Emergency Departments should be considered as a location for smoking cessation interventions in order to increase long term abstinence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf200\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:急诊科(EDs)提供了提供戒烟干预的宝贵机会。长期禁欲对健康的好处最大。方法:在英国急诊室就诊的目前吸烟的成年人被随机分为干预组(简短建议、电子烟和转介到当地戒烟服务)或对照组(当地戒烟服务的联系方式)。作为主要试验的一部分,参与者在1、3和6个月时接受随访。同意长期随访的参与者也在随机化后约18个月联系。对于“所有参与者”分析,那些不同意长期随访的人,他们的吸烟状况设定为6个月结果的值。那些没有回应的人被认为是吸烟者。结果:长期随访14 ~ 22个月,平均18个月。干预组(n = 145)和对照组(n = 143)的长期随访率分别为35%和34%。在那些同意长期随访的患者中,干预组(n = 53)和对照组(n = 35)在18个月时自我报告的7天禁欲率分别为12.8%和8.33% (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.04-2.32, p= 0.031)。在长期随访中,所有参与者自我报告的7天戒断率在干预组为13.8% (n = 67),对照组为8.6% (n = 42) (RR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.12-2.31, p= 0.010)。结论:在随机分组后18个月,在急诊科接受戒烟干预的成年人更有可能报告戒烟。意义:急诊部门应考虑作为戒烟干预的地点,以增加长期戒烟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department (COSTED): Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Emergency Departments (EDs) offer a valuable opportunity to deliver smoking cessation interventions. Long-term abstinence confers the maximum health benefits.

Methods: Adults attending UK EDs who currently smoked were randomized to intervention (brief advice, e-cigarette and referral to local stop smoking services) or control (contact details for local stop smoking services). Participants were followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months as part of the main trial. Participants who consented to long term follow-up were also contacted at approximately 18 months post randomization. For an "all participants" analysis those who did not consent to long-term follow-up had their smoking status set at the value of the 6 month outcome. Those who did not respond were assumed to be smoking.

Results: Long-term follow-up occurred between 14 and 22 months, mean = 18 months. Long term follow-up for those who consented to this was 35% in the intervention group (n = 145) and 34% in the control group (n = 143). For those who consented to long term follow-up self-reported 7-day abstinence at 18 months was 12.8% in the intervention group (n = 53) and 8.33% in the control group (n = 35) (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.04-2.32, p=.031). For all participants self-reported 7-day abstinence at long term follow-up was 13.8% in the intervention group (n = 67) and 8.6% in the control group (n = 42) (RR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.12-2.31, p=.010).

Conclusions: Adults who smoke attending the ED who received a smoking cessation intervention were significantly more likely to report abstinence 18 months after randomization.

Implications: Emergency Departments should be considered as a location for smoking cessation interventions in order to increase long term abstinence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信