不同分类系统对体位斜头严重程度的一致程度。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Cristhina Bonilha Huster Siegle, Carolina Gomes Matarazzo
{"title":"不同分类系统对体位斜头严重程度的一致程度。","authors":"Cristhina Bonilha Huster Siegle, Carolina Gomes Matarazzo","doi":"10.1111/jpc.70204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the agreement between severity level classifications of plagiocephaly using measurement of the difference between transcranial diagonals (DTD) and the Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index (CVAi), based on different references found in the literature.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Observational study conducted with 50 babies with a possible diagnosis of plagiocephaly. Diagnosis and cranial measurements were obtained through 3D cranial scanning. The cranial measurements selected for the study were DTD (in cm) and CVAi (in %), which determined, according to different classification systems, the severity level of the asymmetry as absent, mild, moderate, or severe. Three different classification references using DTD and four using CVAi were applied to determine severity, and agreement between classifications were analyzed using the κ index.</p><p><strong>Results and interpretation: </strong>Agreement between the classifications using DTD and CVAi measurements ranged from weak to moderate across all references found in the literature. All analyses were statistically significant. Findings suggest that there may be conflicts and discrepancies in classifying the deformity as mild, moderate, or severe, which can lead to different clinical treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Degree of Agreement Between Different Classification Systems for Severity Levels of Positional Plagiocephaly.\",\"authors\":\"Cristhina Bonilha Huster Siegle, Carolina Gomes Matarazzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jpc.70204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the agreement between severity level classifications of plagiocephaly using measurement of the difference between transcranial diagonals (DTD) and the Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index (CVAi), based on different references found in the literature.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Observational study conducted with 50 babies with a possible diagnosis of plagiocephaly. Diagnosis and cranial measurements were obtained through 3D cranial scanning. The cranial measurements selected for the study were DTD (in cm) and CVAi (in %), which determined, according to different classification systems, the severity level of the asymmetry as absent, mild, moderate, or severe. Three different classification references using DTD and four using CVAi were applied to determine severity, and agreement between classifications were analyzed using the κ index.</p><p><strong>Results and interpretation: </strong>Agreement between the classifications using DTD and CVAi measurements ranged from weak to moderate across all references found in the literature. All analyses were statistically significant. Findings suggest that there may be conflicts and discrepancies in classifying the deformity as mild, moderate, or severe, which can lead to different clinical treatment decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of paediatrics and child health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of paediatrics and child health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.70204\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.70204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用经颅对角线(DTD)和颅穹窿不对称指数(CVAi)的差异测量,根据不同的文献资料,评估斜头畸形严重程度分类的一致性。方法:对50例可能诊断为斜头畸形的婴儿进行观察性研究。通过三维颅脑扫描获得诊断和颅脑测量。本研究选择的颅骨测量是DTD(单位厘米)和CVAi(单位%),根据不同的分类系统,确定不对称的严重程度为无、轻度、中度或严重。使用DTD的三个不同分类参考文献和使用CVAi的四个不同分类参考文献来确定严重性,并使用κ指数分析分类之间的一致性。结果和解释:在文献中发现的所有参考文献中,使用DTD和CVAi测量的分类之间的一致性范围从弱到中等。所有分析均具有统计学意义。研究结果表明,将畸形分类为轻度、中度或重度可能存在冲突和差异,这可能导致不同的临床治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Degree of Agreement Between Different Classification Systems for Severity Levels of Positional Plagiocephaly.

Aim: To assess the agreement between severity level classifications of plagiocephaly using measurement of the difference between transcranial diagonals (DTD) and the Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index (CVAi), based on different references found in the literature.

Method: Observational study conducted with 50 babies with a possible diagnosis of plagiocephaly. Diagnosis and cranial measurements were obtained through 3D cranial scanning. The cranial measurements selected for the study were DTD (in cm) and CVAi (in %), which determined, according to different classification systems, the severity level of the asymmetry as absent, mild, moderate, or severe. Three different classification references using DTD and four using CVAi were applied to determine severity, and agreement between classifications were analyzed using the κ index.

Results and interpretation: Agreement between the classifications using DTD and CVAi measurements ranged from weak to moderate across all references found in the literature. All analyses were statistically significant. Findings suggest that there may be conflicts and discrepancies in classifying the deformity as mild, moderate, or severe, which can lead to different clinical treatment decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
487
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信