Jesica Temple, Jessica M Blythe, Tim P Boltz, Arron J Giorgi, Christopher M Ashwell, Cangliang Shen
{"title":"小规模生产者自愿采用食品安全新分类框架的开发和验证:一项试点研究。","authors":"Jesica Temple, Jessica M Blythe, Tim P Boltz, Arron J Giorgi, Christopher M Ashwell, Cangliang Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study utilizes a novel classification framework to address voluntary food safety practices among small-scale produce growers who sell primarily at West Virginia farmers' markets. Limited data exist on how these exempt growers voluntarily adopt post-harvest food safety practices. This pilot study assessed post-harvest food safety behaviors and introduced a behavioral classification framework-Willing, Ready, and Able (WRA)-to stratify engagement among FSMA-exempt small-scale produce growers. A cross-sectional survey was administered in 2025 to 40 growers at the West Virginia Small Farms Conference. FSMA exemption was confirmed by self-report or eligibility criteria; five FSMA-covered respondents were excluded, yielding a final sample of 35. Growers were categorized as FSMA-Willing (no training, confident in current practices), FSMA-Ready (training plus adoption of one to three Good Agricultural Practices(GAPs)aligned practices), or FSMA-Able (training plus adoption of four or more GAPs-aligned practices). Among FSMA-exempt respondents (n = 35), 62.8% reported training, 53.1% sanitized surfaces, and 52.5% used refrigeration. WRA classification revealed that 34.3% were Willing, 34.3% Ready, and 28.5% Able. The WRA framework introduces a novel behavioral classification system to differentiate FSMA-exempt growers by readiness, training history, and current safety practices. These findings suggest many exempt growers voluntarily implement risk-reducing behaviors, and WRA can guide targeted outreach to improve food safety in decentralized systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":" ","pages":"100630"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a Novel Classification Framework for Voluntary Food Safety Adoption Among Small-Scale Produce Growers: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jesica Temple, Jessica M Blythe, Tim P Boltz, Arron J Giorgi, Christopher M Ashwell, Cangliang Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study utilizes a novel classification framework to address voluntary food safety practices among small-scale produce growers who sell primarily at West Virginia farmers' markets. Limited data exist on how these exempt growers voluntarily adopt post-harvest food safety practices. This pilot study assessed post-harvest food safety behaviors and introduced a behavioral classification framework-Willing, Ready, and Able (WRA)-to stratify engagement among FSMA-exempt small-scale produce growers. A cross-sectional survey was administered in 2025 to 40 growers at the West Virginia Small Farms Conference. FSMA exemption was confirmed by self-report or eligibility criteria; five FSMA-covered respondents were excluded, yielding a final sample of 35. Growers were categorized as FSMA-Willing (no training, confident in current practices), FSMA-Ready (training plus adoption of one to three Good Agricultural Practices(GAPs)aligned practices), or FSMA-Able (training plus adoption of four or more GAPs-aligned practices). Among FSMA-exempt respondents (n = 35), 62.8% reported training, 53.1% sanitized surfaces, and 52.5% used refrigeration. WRA classification revealed that 34.3% were Willing, 34.3% Ready, and 28.5% Able. The WRA framework introduces a novel behavioral classification system to differentiate FSMA-exempt growers by readiness, training history, and current safety practices. These findings suggest many exempt growers voluntarily implement risk-reducing behaviors, and WRA can guide targeted outreach to improve food safety in decentralized systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100630\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100630\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100630","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and Validation of a Novel Classification Framework for Voluntary Food Safety Adoption Among Small-Scale Produce Growers: A Pilot Study.
This study utilizes a novel classification framework to address voluntary food safety practices among small-scale produce growers who sell primarily at West Virginia farmers' markets. Limited data exist on how these exempt growers voluntarily adopt post-harvest food safety practices. This pilot study assessed post-harvest food safety behaviors and introduced a behavioral classification framework-Willing, Ready, and Able (WRA)-to stratify engagement among FSMA-exempt small-scale produce growers. A cross-sectional survey was administered in 2025 to 40 growers at the West Virginia Small Farms Conference. FSMA exemption was confirmed by self-report or eligibility criteria; five FSMA-covered respondents were excluded, yielding a final sample of 35. Growers were categorized as FSMA-Willing (no training, confident in current practices), FSMA-Ready (training plus adoption of one to three Good Agricultural Practices(GAPs)aligned practices), or FSMA-Able (training plus adoption of four or more GAPs-aligned practices). Among FSMA-exempt respondents (n = 35), 62.8% reported training, 53.1% sanitized surfaces, and 52.5% used refrigeration. WRA classification revealed that 34.3% were Willing, 34.3% Ready, and 28.5% Able. The WRA framework introduces a novel behavioral classification system to differentiate FSMA-exempt growers by readiness, training history, and current safety practices. These findings suggest many exempt growers voluntarily implement risk-reducing behaviors, and WRA can guide targeted outreach to improve food safety in decentralized systems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.