全球长冠肺炎流行、亚型和风险因素:最新的系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-08-30 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf533
Yiren Hou, Tian Gu, Zhouchi Ni, Xu Shi, Megan L Ranney, Bhramar Mukherjee
{"title":"全球长冠肺炎流行、亚型和风险因素:最新的系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Yiren Hou, Tian Gu, Zhouchi Ni, Xu Shi, Megan L Ranney, Bhramar Mukherjee","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This mega-systematic review evaluated the global prevalence of long COVID and its subtypes and symptoms, and assessed the effects of risk factors for long COVID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies published from 5 July 2021 to 29 May 2024 were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, with supplemental updates on 23 July 2024. Data were pooled using a random-effects framework with DerSimonian-Laird estimator. Risk of bias analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 429 studies were meta-analyzed. The global pooled long COVID prevalence was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33%-40%) with 144 contributing studies. The highest prevalence rates were observed in South America (51% [95% CI, 35%-66%]). The prevalence of long COVID persisted over time, with 35% (95% CI, 31%-39%) at <1 year of follow-up and 46% (95% CI, 37%-57%) at 1-2 years. The most prevalent subtypes were respiratory (20% [95% CI, 14%-28%]) estimated from 31 studies, general fatigue (20% [95% CI, 18%-23%]) from 119 studies, psychological (18% [95% CI, 11%-28%]) from 10 studies, and neurological (16% [95% CI, 8%-30%]) from 23 studies. The 3 strongest risk factors were being unvaccinated for COVID-19 (pooled odds ratio [OR], 2.09 [95% CI, 1.55-2.81]) meta-analyzed from 7 studies, infections from pre-Omicron variants (OR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.40-2.17]) from 6 studies, and female sex (OR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.32-1.84]) from 33 studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long COVID is globally prevalent after a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, highlighting a continuing health challenge. The heterogeneity of estimates across populations argues the need for well-designed follow-up studies that use consistent measures and are globally representative.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 9","pages":"ofaf533"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Prevalence of Long COVID, Its Subtypes, and Risk Factors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yiren Hou, Tian Gu, Zhouchi Ni, Xu Shi, Megan L Ranney, Bhramar Mukherjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ofid/ofaf533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This mega-systematic review evaluated the global prevalence of long COVID and its subtypes and symptoms, and assessed the effects of risk factors for long COVID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies published from 5 July 2021 to 29 May 2024 were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, with supplemental updates on 23 July 2024. Data were pooled using a random-effects framework with DerSimonian-Laird estimator. Risk of bias analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 429 studies were meta-analyzed. The global pooled long COVID prevalence was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33%-40%) with 144 contributing studies. The highest prevalence rates were observed in South America (51% [95% CI, 35%-66%]). The prevalence of long COVID persisted over time, with 35% (95% CI, 31%-39%) at <1 year of follow-up and 46% (95% CI, 37%-57%) at 1-2 years. The most prevalent subtypes were respiratory (20% [95% CI, 14%-28%]) estimated from 31 studies, general fatigue (20% [95% CI, 18%-23%]) from 119 studies, psychological (18% [95% CI, 11%-28%]) from 10 studies, and neurological (16% [95% CI, 8%-30%]) from 23 studies. The 3 strongest risk factors were being unvaccinated for COVID-19 (pooled odds ratio [OR], 2.09 [95% CI, 1.55-2.81]) meta-analyzed from 7 studies, infections from pre-Omicron variants (OR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.40-2.17]) from 6 studies, and female sex (OR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.32-1.84]) from 33 studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long COVID is globally prevalent after a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, highlighting a continuing health challenge. The heterogeneity of estimates across populations argues the need for well-designed follow-up studies that use consistent measures and are globally representative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"ofaf533\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461872/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf533\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本大型系统综述评估了长冠状病毒及其亚型和症状的全球流行情况,并评估了长冠状病毒危险因素的影响。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Web of Science中于2021年7月5日至2024年5月29日发表的研究,并于2024年7月23日进行补充更新。数据汇集使用随机效应框架与dersimonan - laird估计。进行偏倚风险分析。结果:共有429项研究进行了meta分析。全球合并的COVID长期患病率为36%(95%置信区间[CI], 33%-40%), 144项有贡献的研究。南美洲的患病率最高(51% [95% CI, 35%-66%])。随着时间的推移,长冠状病毒的流行率持续存在,在结论中为35% (95% CI, 31%-39%):在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2感染后,长冠状病毒在全球流行,突出了持续的健康挑战。不同人群估计值的异质性表明,需要设计良好的后续研究,使用一致的测量方法,并具有全球代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global Prevalence of Long COVID, Its Subtypes, and Risk Factors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: This mega-systematic review evaluated the global prevalence of long COVID and its subtypes and symptoms, and assessed the effects of risk factors for long COVID.

Methods: Studies published from 5 July 2021 to 29 May 2024 were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, with supplemental updates on 23 July 2024. Data were pooled using a random-effects framework with DerSimonian-Laird estimator. Risk of bias analysis was conducted.

Results: A total of 429 studies were meta-analyzed. The global pooled long COVID prevalence was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33%-40%) with 144 contributing studies. The highest prevalence rates were observed in South America (51% [95% CI, 35%-66%]). The prevalence of long COVID persisted over time, with 35% (95% CI, 31%-39%) at <1 year of follow-up and 46% (95% CI, 37%-57%) at 1-2 years. The most prevalent subtypes were respiratory (20% [95% CI, 14%-28%]) estimated from 31 studies, general fatigue (20% [95% CI, 18%-23%]) from 119 studies, psychological (18% [95% CI, 11%-28%]) from 10 studies, and neurological (16% [95% CI, 8%-30%]) from 23 studies. The 3 strongest risk factors were being unvaccinated for COVID-19 (pooled odds ratio [OR], 2.09 [95% CI, 1.55-2.81]) meta-analyzed from 7 studies, infections from pre-Omicron variants (OR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.40-2.17]) from 6 studies, and female sex (OR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.32-1.84]) from 33 studies.

Conclusions: Long COVID is globally prevalent after a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, highlighting a continuing health challenge. The heterogeneity of estimates across populations argues the need for well-designed follow-up studies that use consistent measures and are globally representative.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信