探索一个低相容性种群,作为研究宿主-寄生虫与曼氏血吸虫相互作用的模型(软体动物:腹足动物)。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PARASITOLOGY
Cristhiane Oliveira da Fonseca, Marina de Moraes Mourão, Vitor do Espirito Santo Pimentel, Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho, Delza de Moura Soares Reis, Kleiton Esteves Costa, Dílcia Maria Repetição, Ludmila Gomes Muniz Rodrigues, Omar Dos Santos Carvalho, Lângia Colli Montresor, Roberta Lima Caldeira
{"title":"探索一个低相容性种群,作为研究宿主-寄生虫与曼氏血吸虫相互作用的模型(软体动物:腹足动物)。","authors":"Cristhiane Oliveira da Fonseca, Marina de Moraes Mourão, Vitor do Espirito Santo Pimentel, Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho, Delza de Moura Soares Reis, Kleiton Esteves Costa, Dílcia Maria Repetição, Ludmila Gomes Muniz Rodrigues, Omar Dos Santos Carvalho, Lângia Colli Montresor, Roberta Lima Caldeira","doi":"10.1016/j.parint.2025.103176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most populations of Biomphalaria glabrata are highly compatible with Schistosoma mansoni strains, making it challenging to identify low-compatibility models to host-parasite interaction research. This study evaluated a B. glabrata population with low compatibility with the LE strain (SmLE) as a model. First, pigmented low susceptibility (LS) and albino susceptible (S) snails were paired to produce three progeny groups: Crossings (CR) between LS × S, LS (LS × LS), and S (S × S). F1 snails were individually challenged with SmLE, and compatibility and reproductive parameters were analyzed. Second, mass crossbreeding (150LS + 150S) produced F1 snails, later challenged with SmLE. Unchallenged F1 snails were then used for new mass crossbreeding, either without (CR1) or with (CR2) the introduction of LS snails (1:1 ratio). The F2 snails were challenged, and compatibility was assessed. In the pairings, the CR snails were predominantly pigmented (CRp). At 8 miracidia/snail challenge, F1 snails compatibility following the pattern S > CRp > LS, consistent in both pairings and mass crossbreeding. In F2, CR1 resembled S, while CR2 showed intermediate compatibility (S=CR1 > CR2 > LS). Although crossings led to a reduction in the compatibility of the progeny F1 compared to the S group, the results suggest that resistance transfer between LS and S B. glabrata populations is less effective than previously demonstrated for susceptible/compatible and resistant/incompatible populations of the Biomphalaria tenagophila. Traditional snail control measures (e.g., environmental modifications) are inadvisable in transmission foci maintained by B. glabrata. This study demonstrates that the population tested is not suitable for snail control strategies, although it may serve as a valuable experimental model for investigating host-parasite interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19983,"journal":{"name":"Parasitology International","volume":" ","pages":"103176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring a low-compatibility population of Biomphalaria glabrata (Mollusca: Gastropoda) as a model for studying host-parasite interactions with Schistosoma mansoni (Trematoda: Digenea).\",\"authors\":\"Cristhiane Oliveira da Fonseca, Marina de Moraes Mourão, Vitor do Espirito Santo Pimentel, Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho, Delza de Moura Soares Reis, Kleiton Esteves Costa, Dílcia Maria Repetição, Ludmila Gomes Muniz Rodrigues, Omar Dos Santos Carvalho, Lângia Colli Montresor, Roberta Lima Caldeira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.parint.2025.103176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Most populations of Biomphalaria glabrata are highly compatible with Schistosoma mansoni strains, making it challenging to identify low-compatibility models to host-parasite interaction research. This study evaluated a B. glabrata population with low compatibility with the LE strain (SmLE) as a model. First, pigmented low susceptibility (LS) and albino susceptible (S) snails were paired to produce three progeny groups: Crossings (CR) between LS × S, LS (LS × LS), and S (S × S). F1 snails were individually challenged with SmLE, and compatibility and reproductive parameters were analyzed. Second, mass crossbreeding (150LS + 150S) produced F1 snails, later challenged with SmLE. Unchallenged F1 snails were then used for new mass crossbreeding, either without (CR1) or with (CR2) the introduction of LS snails (1:1 ratio). The F2 snails were challenged, and compatibility was assessed. In the pairings, the CR snails were predominantly pigmented (CRp). At 8 miracidia/snail challenge, F1 snails compatibility following the pattern S > CRp > LS, consistent in both pairings and mass crossbreeding. In F2, CR1 resembled S, while CR2 showed intermediate compatibility (S=CR1 > CR2 > LS). Although crossings led to a reduction in the compatibility of the progeny F1 compared to the S group, the results suggest that resistance transfer between LS and S B. glabrata populations is less effective than previously demonstrated for susceptible/compatible and resistant/incompatible populations of the Biomphalaria tenagophila. Traditional snail control measures (e.g., environmental modifications) are inadvisable in transmission foci maintained by B. glabrata. This study demonstrates that the population tested is not suitable for snail control strategies, although it may serve as a valuable experimental model for investigating host-parasite interactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parasitology International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"103176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parasitology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2025.103176\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasitology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2025.103176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数裸毛生物phalaria种群与曼氏血吸虫株系高度相容,这给宿主-寄生虫相互作用研究的低相容性模型的建立带来了挑战。本研究评价了一个与LE菌株(SmLE)亲和性较低的光斑白僵菌群体作为模型。首先,将色素低易感蜗牛(LS)和白化易感蜗牛(S)配对,产生3个后代组:LS × S、LS (LS × LS)和S (S × S)的杂交(CR)。用SmLE对F1钉螺进行单独攻毒,分析其亲和性和繁殖参数。其次,通过150LS + 150S进行大规模杂交,产生F1钉螺,然后用SmLE进行挑战。然后将未攻偶的F1钉螺进行新的大规模杂交,不引入(CR1)或引入(CR2) LS钉螺(1:1比例)。对F2钉螺进行攻毒,并进行相容性评价。在配对中,CR蜗牛主要是色素(CRp)。在8个miracidia/snail挑战下,F1蜗牛的亲和性遵循S > CRp > LS模式,在配对和大规模杂交中都是一致的。在F2中,CR1与S相似,而CR2表现出中间相容性(S=CR1 > CR2 > LS)。虽然与S组相比,杂交导致后代F1的亲和性降低,但结果表明,LS和S B. glabrata群体之间的抗性转移不如之前所证明的那样有效,在感/亲和和抗性/不亲和的tenagophila生物phalaria群体中。传统的蜗牛控制措施(例如,环境改变)在由光滑白僵菌维持的传播焦点中是不可取的。该研究表明,尽管被测种群可能作为研究宿主-寄生虫相互作用的有价值的实验模型,但它不适合用于蜗牛控制策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring a low-compatibility population of Biomphalaria glabrata (Mollusca: Gastropoda) as a model for studying host-parasite interactions with Schistosoma mansoni (Trematoda: Digenea).

Most populations of Biomphalaria glabrata are highly compatible with Schistosoma mansoni strains, making it challenging to identify low-compatibility models to host-parasite interaction research. This study evaluated a B. glabrata population with low compatibility with the LE strain (SmLE) as a model. First, pigmented low susceptibility (LS) and albino susceptible (S) snails were paired to produce three progeny groups: Crossings (CR) between LS × S, LS (LS × LS), and S (S × S). F1 snails were individually challenged with SmLE, and compatibility and reproductive parameters were analyzed. Second, mass crossbreeding (150LS + 150S) produced F1 snails, later challenged with SmLE. Unchallenged F1 snails were then used for new mass crossbreeding, either without (CR1) or with (CR2) the introduction of LS snails (1:1 ratio). The F2 snails were challenged, and compatibility was assessed. In the pairings, the CR snails were predominantly pigmented (CRp). At 8 miracidia/snail challenge, F1 snails compatibility following the pattern S > CRp > LS, consistent in both pairings and mass crossbreeding. In F2, CR1 resembled S, while CR2 showed intermediate compatibility (S=CR1 > CR2 > LS). Although crossings led to a reduction in the compatibility of the progeny F1 compared to the S group, the results suggest that resistance transfer between LS and S B. glabrata populations is less effective than previously demonstrated for susceptible/compatible and resistant/incompatible populations of the Biomphalaria tenagophila. Traditional snail control measures (e.g., environmental modifications) are inadvisable in transmission foci maintained by B. glabrata. This study demonstrates that the population tested is not suitable for snail control strategies, although it may serve as a valuable experimental model for investigating host-parasite interactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Parasitology International
Parasitology International 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
140
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Parasitology International provides a medium for rapid, carefully reviewed publications in the field of human and animal parasitology. Original papers, rapid communications, and original case reports from all geographical areas and covering all parasitological disciplines, including structure, immunology, cell biology, biochemistry, molecular biology, and systematics, may be submitted. Reviews on recent developments are invited regularly, but suggestions in this respect are welcome. Letters to the Editor commenting on any aspect of the Journal are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信