非粘附悬浮液固定脐带对早产儿CLABSI的影响-倾向评分匹配研究。

IF 0.9 Q2 Medicine
Tsv Vahnita, Umamaheswari Balakrishnan, Prakash Amboiram, Saishree Pradhan
{"title":"非粘附悬浮液固定脐带对早产儿CLABSI的影响-倾向评分匹配研究。","authors":"Tsv Vahnita, Umamaheswari Balakrishnan, Prakash Amboiram, Saishree Pradhan","doi":"10.1177/19345798251380176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundFixing umbilical lines using medical adhesives raises concern of skin injury, creating a potential source of infection increasing the likelihood of central associated blood stream infection (CLABSI). Considering this, we adapted an alternate method of non-adhesive vertical suspension technique for fixation of umbilical lines. This study compared CLABSI rate between suspension method and conventional method.MethodsThis before-after design (observational study) included preterm neonates <32 weeks of gestational age (GA) who required umbilical line insertion. Suspension technique for fixation of umbilical lines was adopted from October, 2024. Based on the technique, neonates were grouped as ADHESIVE group (AG) admitted between October 2023 and September 2024, and SUSPENSION group (SG) admitted between October 2024 and March 2025. Propensity matching for GA formed a matched cohort of 60 neonates. Outcome of the study included comparison of CLABSI rate among two groups, and skin injury and displacement of umbilical lines in SG.ResultsOut of 60 matched neonates, 30 were included in the SG. CLABSI rate in the SG and AG was 6.2 and 30.1, respectively (RR- 0.20, 95% CI 0.004-1.83). According to McNemar's test SG had a significant lower CLABSI rate (<i>p</i> < 0.001).ConclusionThis study highlights the feasibility of the non-adhesive suspension technique as a method to fix umbilical catheter with no associated skin injury and displacement. Though there was no difference in CLABSI rate overall, with propensity matching for GA, this technique had lower CLABSI rate. Future larger studies are needed to evaluate efficacy of this technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":16537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"19345798251380176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of non-adhesive suspension method for fixing umbilical lines on CLABSI in preterm neonates - A propensity score matched study.\",\"authors\":\"Tsv Vahnita, Umamaheswari Balakrishnan, Prakash Amboiram, Saishree Pradhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19345798251380176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundFixing umbilical lines using medical adhesives raises concern of skin injury, creating a potential source of infection increasing the likelihood of central associated blood stream infection (CLABSI). Considering this, we adapted an alternate method of non-adhesive vertical suspension technique for fixation of umbilical lines. This study compared CLABSI rate between suspension method and conventional method.MethodsThis before-after design (observational study) included preterm neonates <32 weeks of gestational age (GA) who required umbilical line insertion. Suspension technique for fixation of umbilical lines was adopted from October, 2024. Based on the technique, neonates were grouped as ADHESIVE group (AG) admitted between October 2023 and September 2024, and SUSPENSION group (SG) admitted between October 2024 and March 2025. Propensity matching for GA formed a matched cohort of 60 neonates. Outcome of the study included comparison of CLABSI rate among two groups, and skin injury and displacement of umbilical lines in SG.ResultsOut of 60 matched neonates, 30 were included in the SG. CLABSI rate in the SG and AG was 6.2 and 30.1, respectively (RR- 0.20, 95% CI 0.004-1.83). According to McNemar's test SG had a significant lower CLABSI rate (<i>p</i> < 0.001).ConclusionThis study highlights the feasibility of the non-adhesive suspension technique as a method to fix umbilical catheter with no associated skin injury and displacement. Though there was no difference in CLABSI rate overall, with propensity matching for GA, this technique had lower CLABSI rate. Future larger studies are needed to evaluate efficacy of this technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19345798251380176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19345798251380176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19345798251380176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用医用胶粘剂固定脐带会引起对皮肤损伤的担忧,产生潜在的感染源,增加中枢相关血流感染(CLABSI)的可能性。考虑到这一点,我们采用了一种非粘连垂直悬挂技术来固定脐带线。本研究比较了悬浮法和常规法的CLABSI率。方法采用前后对照设计(观察性研究),纳入早产儿(p < 0.001)。结论无粘连悬吊技术是一种无皮肤损伤和移位的脐带导管固定方法。虽然CLABSI率总体上没有差异,但与GA的倾向匹配,该技术的CLABSI率较低。未来需要更大规模的研究来评估该技术的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of non-adhesive suspension method for fixing umbilical lines on CLABSI in preterm neonates - A propensity score matched study.

BackgroundFixing umbilical lines using medical adhesives raises concern of skin injury, creating a potential source of infection increasing the likelihood of central associated blood stream infection (CLABSI). Considering this, we adapted an alternate method of non-adhesive vertical suspension technique for fixation of umbilical lines. This study compared CLABSI rate between suspension method and conventional method.MethodsThis before-after design (observational study) included preterm neonates <32 weeks of gestational age (GA) who required umbilical line insertion. Suspension technique for fixation of umbilical lines was adopted from October, 2024. Based on the technique, neonates were grouped as ADHESIVE group (AG) admitted between October 2023 and September 2024, and SUSPENSION group (SG) admitted between October 2024 and March 2025. Propensity matching for GA formed a matched cohort of 60 neonates. Outcome of the study included comparison of CLABSI rate among two groups, and skin injury and displacement of umbilical lines in SG.ResultsOut of 60 matched neonates, 30 were included in the SG. CLABSI rate in the SG and AG was 6.2 and 30.1, respectively (RR- 0.20, 95% CI 0.004-1.83). According to McNemar's test SG had a significant lower CLABSI rate (p < 0.001).ConclusionThis study highlights the feasibility of the non-adhesive suspension technique as a method to fix umbilical catheter with no associated skin injury and displacement. Though there was no difference in CLABSI rate overall, with propensity matching for GA, this technique had lower CLABSI rate. Future larger studies are needed to evaluate efficacy of this technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信