药剂师主导的选择性剖宫产入院前门诊对药剂师工作流程效率和患者术后出院药物供应准备的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Charis Lau, Rita Wardan
{"title":"药剂师主导的选择性剖宫产入院前门诊对药剂师工作流程效率和患者术后出院药物供应准备的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Charis Lau, Rita Wardan","doi":"10.1007/s11096-025-02015-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rapid patient throughput on maternity wards results in pharmacist resources being directed towards discharge processes, primarily focused on patients who have undergone caesarean section (CS) due to their discharge medication requirements. This occurs at the expense of admission processes, including best possible medication history (BPMH) documentation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-led elective caesarean section (ELCS) pre-admission clinic (PAC) on efficiency of pharmacist workflows, BPMH documentation, and patient preparedness for analgesic supply on discharge.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective observational study was undertaken at an Australian tertiary obstetric public hospital where an ELCS PAC was introduced through reallocation of clinical pharmacist resources. The PAC pharmacist attempted telephone contact with all patients scheduled for ELCS, within 1 week before surgery. The pharmacist obtained and documented a BPMH, and where appropriate, encouraged patients to purchase paracetamol and ibuprofen pre-operatively. Data were collected from electronic medical records and dispensing records for 1 month pre- and 2 months post-implementation, including: CS classification (elective or emergency); whether PAC was completed and timing of completion before CS; number of BPMH documented per day; timing of BPMH completion after CS; pharmacist staffing levels; and whether paracetamol and ibuprofen were dispensed on discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the 3-month study period, 1863 patients were admitted to the maternity wards, with 654 patients birthing via CS. Elective CS accounted for 43.3% (283/654) of CS deliveries, with 57.2% (162/283) of these patients reviewed in ELCS PAC. Post-implementation, workflow efficiency increased, with 19.9% more BPMH documented per pharmacist per day (3.87 vs 4.64, p = 0.012). Overall BPMH completion increased for all patients who underwent CS (83.7% vs 93.3%, p < 0.001). Timeliness of BPMH documentation improved for ELCS patients, with higher BPMH completion on the day of surgery (19.8% vs 34.5%, p = 0.019). Patients reviewed in PAC were less likely to require discharge supply of paracetamol (52% vs 37.1%, p = 0.031) and ibuprofen (80% vs 56.4%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reallocation of resources to introduce the ELCS PAC enhanced workflow efficiency and BPMH completion. Patient preparedness improved, with reduced reliance on hospital supply of simple analgesics on discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a pharmacist-led elective caesarean section pre-admission clinic on efficiency of pharmacist workflow and patient preparedness for post-operative discharge medication supply: a retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Charis Lau, Rita Wardan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11096-025-02015-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rapid patient throughput on maternity wards results in pharmacist resources being directed towards discharge processes, primarily focused on patients who have undergone caesarean section (CS) due to their discharge medication requirements. This occurs at the expense of admission processes, including best possible medication history (BPMH) documentation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-led elective caesarean section (ELCS) pre-admission clinic (PAC) on efficiency of pharmacist workflows, BPMH documentation, and patient preparedness for analgesic supply on discharge.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective observational study was undertaken at an Australian tertiary obstetric public hospital where an ELCS PAC was introduced through reallocation of clinical pharmacist resources. The PAC pharmacist attempted telephone contact with all patients scheduled for ELCS, within 1 week before surgery. The pharmacist obtained and documented a BPMH, and where appropriate, encouraged patients to purchase paracetamol and ibuprofen pre-operatively. Data were collected from electronic medical records and dispensing records for 1 month pre- and 2 months post-implementation, including: CS classification (elective or emergency); whether PAC was completed and timing of completion before CS; number of BPMH documented per day; timing of BPMH completion after CS; pharmacist staffing levels; and whether paracetamol and ibuprofen were dispensed on discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the 3-month study period, 1863 patients were admitted to the maternity wards, with 654 patients birthing via CS. Elective CS accounted for 43.3% (283/654) of CS deliveries, with 57.2% (162/283) of these patients reviewed in ELCS PAC. Post-implementation, workflow efficiency increased, with 19.9% more BPMH documented per pharmacist per day (3.87 vs 4.64, p = 0.012). Overall BPMH completion increased for all patients who underwent CS (83.7% vs 93.3%, p < 0.001). Timeliness of BPMH documentation improved for ELCS patients, with higher BPMH completion on the day of surgery (19.8% vs 34.5%, p = 0.019). Patients reviewed in PAC were less likely to require discharge supply of paracetamol (52% vs 37.1%, p = 0.031) and ibuprofen (80% vs 56.4%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reallocation of resources to introduce the ELCS PAC enhanced workflow efficiency and BPMH completion. Patient preparedness improved, with reduced reliance on hospital supply of simple analgesics on discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-02015-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-02015-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导语:产房的快速病人吞吐量导致药剂师资源被直接用于出院过程,主要集中在因出院药物要求而接受剖腹产(CS)的患者。这是以住院过程为代价的,包括最佳用药史(BPMH)文件。目的:评估药剂师主导的选择性剖宫产(ELCS)入院前临床(PAC)对药剂师工作流程效率、BPMH文件记录和出院时患者镇痛供应准备的影响。方法:在澳大利亚一家三级产科公立医院进行回顾性观察研究,通过重新分配临床药师资源引入ELCS PAC。PAC药剂师在手术前1周内尝试电话联系所有计划进行ELCS的患者。药剂师获得并记录BPMH,并在适当的情况下,鼓励患者术前购买扑热息痛和布洛芬。从实施前1个月和实施后2个月的电子病历和配药记录中收集数据,包括:CS分类(选择性或急诊);检讨是否已完成,以及检讨完成的时间为何;每天记录的BPMH数量;CS后BPMH完成时间;药剂师人员配备水平;出院时是否配发扑热息痛和布洛芬。结果:在为期3个月的研究期间,1863例患者入住产科病房,654例患者通过CS分娩。选择性CS占CS分娩的43.3%(283/654),其中57.2%(162/283)的患者在ELCS PAC中接受了审查。实施后,工作流程效率提高,每位药剂师每天记录的BPMH增加了19.9% (3.87 vs 4.64, p = 0.012)。所有CS患者的BPMH完成度总体提高(83.7% vs 93.3%)。结论:重新分配资源引入ELCS PAC可提高工作效率和BPMH完成度。病人的准备工作得到改善,出院时对医院供应的简单镇痛药的依赖减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of a pharmacist-led elective caesarean section pre-admission clinic on efficiency of pharmacist workflow and patient preparedness for post-operative discharge medication supply: a retrospective observational study.

Introduction: Rapid patient throughput on maternity wards results in pharmacist resources being directed towards discharge processes, primarily focused on patients who have undergone caesarean section (CS) due to their discharge medication requirements. This occurs at the expense of admission processes, including best possible medication history (BPMH) documentation.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-led elective caesarean section (ELCS) pre-admission clinic (PAC) on efficiency of pharmacist workflows, BPMH documentation, and patient preparedness for analgesic supply on discharge.

Method: A retrospective observational study was undertaken at an Australian tertiary obstetric public hospital where an ELCS PAC was introduced through reallocation of clinical pharmacist resources. The PAC pharmacist attempted telephone contact with all patients scheduled for ELCS, within 1 week before surgery. The pharmacist obtained and documented a BPMH, and where appropriate, encouraged patients to purchase paracetamol and ibuprofen pre-operatively. Data were collected from electronic medical records and dispensing records for 1 month pre- and 2 months post-implementation, including: CS classification (elective or emergency); whether PAC was completed and timing of completion before CS; number of BPMH documented per day; timing of BPMH completion after CS; pharmacist staffing levels; and whether paracetamol and ibuprofen were dispensed on discharge.

Results: During the 3-month study period, 1863 patients were admitted to the maternity wards, with 654 patients birthing via CS. Elective CS accounted for 43.3% (283/654) of CS deliveries, with 57.2% (162/283) of these patients reviewed in ELCS PAC. Post-implementation, workflow efficiency increased, with 19.9% more BPMH documented per pharmacist per day (3.87 vs 4.64, p = 0.012). Overall BPMH completion increased for all patients who underwent CS (83.7% vs 93.3%, p < 0.001). Timeliness of BPMH documentation improved for ELCS patients, with higher BPMH completion on the day of surgery (19.8% vs 34.5%, p = 0.019). Patients reviewed in PAC were less likely to require discharge supply of paracetamol (52% vs 37.1%, p = 0.031) and ibuprofen (80% vs 56.4%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Reallocation of resources to introduce the ELCS PAC enhanced workflow efficiency and BPMH completion. Patient preparedness improved, with reduced reliance on hospital supply of simple analgesics on discharge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信