10%聚维酮碘与克霉唑溶液治疗耳真菌病的疗效比较:随机、双盲对照试验。

IF 1.1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-09-26 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1810001
Pilasluck Numchaichanakij, Pattraporn Kreesaeng
{"title":"10%聚维酮碘与克霉唑溶液治疗耳真菌病的疗效比较:随机、双盲对照试验。","authors":"Pilasluck Numchaichanakij, Pattraporn Kreesaeng","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1810001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The main treatment of otomycosis has required the use of topical antifungal drops and/or acidifying agents. However, because of the availability issues of antifungal drops in developing countries, treatment with acidifying agents alone is necessary.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy in the treatment of otomycosis using a 10% povidone-iodine and clotrimazole solution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with otomycosis were assigned to 10% povidone-iodine group and Clotrimazole group. The patients were evaluated on the response of each group at 1, 2,4 and 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>93 patients were assigned to the 10% povidone-iodine group and 95 patients to the Clotrimazole group. the response to treatment between groups. In the second week after treatment, 37.64% of the 10% povidone-iodine group and 40% of the Clotrimazole group had a good response to treatment (p = 0.551). In the fourth week after treatment, 52.69% of the 10% povidone-iodine group and 55.79% of the Clotrimazole group had a good response to treatment (p = 0.644). In the eighth week after treatment, 58.06% of the 10% povidone-iodine group and 64.21% of the Clotrimazole group had a good response to treatment (p = 0.642) In the 12th week after treatment, 76.34% of the 10% povidone-iodine group and 85.26% of the Clotrimazole group had a good response to treatment (p = 0.248).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no significant differences in the response to between 10% povidone-iodine and Clotrimazole groups in the second, fourth, eighth and twelfths after treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"29 3","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Efficacy in the Treatment of Otomycosis using 10% Povidone-Iodine and Clotrimazole Solution: Randomized, Double-Blind Control Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Pilasluck Numchaichanakij, Pattraporn Kreesaeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0045-1810001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The main treatment of otomycosis has required the use of topical antifungal drops and/or acidifying agents. However, because of the availability issues of antifungal drops in developing countries, treatment with acidifying agents alone is necessary.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy in the treatment of otomycosis using a 10% povidone-iodine and clotrimazole solution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with otomycosis were assigned to 10% povidone-iodine group and Clotrimazole group. The patients were evaluated on the response of each group at 1, 2,4 and 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>93 patients were assigned to the 10% povidone-iodine group and 95 patients to the Clotrimazole group. the response to treatment between groups. In the second week after treatment, 37.64% of the 10% povidone-iodine group and 40% of the Clotrimazole group had a good response to treatment (p = 0.551). In the fourth week after treatment, 52.69% of the 10% povidone-iodine group and 55.79% of the Clotrimazole group had a good response to treatment (p = 0.644). In the eighth week after treatment, 58.06% of the 10% povidone-iodine group and 64.21% of the Clotrimazole group had a good response to treatment (p = 0.642) In the 12th week after treatment, 76.34% of the 10% povidone-iodine group and 85.26% of the Clotrimazole group had a good response to treatment (p = 0.248).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no significant differences in the response to between 10% povidone-iodine and Clotrimazole groups in the second, fourth, eighth and twelfths after treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473514/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1810001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1810001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:耳真菌病的主要治疗需要使用局部抗真菌滴剂和/或酸化剂。然而,由于抗真菌滴剂在发展中国家的可得性问题,单独使用酸化剂进行治疗是必要的。目的:本研究的目的是比较10%聚维酮碘和克霉唑溶液治疗耳真菌病的疗效。方法:将耳真菌病患者分为10%聚维酮碘组和克霉唑组。分别于第1、2、4、8周对各组患者进行疗效评价。结果:10%聚维酮碘组93例,氯曲霉唑组95例。组间治疗反应。治疗后第2周,10%聚维酮碘组37.64%、氯曲霉唑组40%的患者对治疗有良好的反应(p = 0.551)。治疗后第4周,10%聚维酮碘组52.69%、克霉唑组55.79%的患者对治疗有良好反应(p = 0.644)。治疗后第8周,10%聚维酮碘组58.06%、氯曲霉唑组64.21%的患者对治疗有良好反应(p = 0.642)。治疗后第12周,10%聚维酮碘组76.34%、氯曲霉唑组85.26%的患者对治疗有良好反应(p = 0.248)。结论:10%聚维酮碘组与氯曲霉唑组在治疗后第2、4、8、12天的疗效差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Efficacy in the Treatment of Otomycosis using 10% Povidone-Iodine and Clotrimazole Solution: Randomized, Double-Blind Control Trial.

Introduction: The main treatment of otomycosis has required the use of topical antifungal drops and/or acidifying agents. However, because of the availability issues of antifungal drops in developing countries, treatment with acidifying agents alone is necessary.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy in the treatment of otomycosis using a 10% povidone-iodine and clotrimazole solution.

Methods: Patients with otomycosis were assigned to 10% povidone-iodine group and Clotrimazole group. The patients were evaluated on the response of each group at 1, 2,4 and 8 weeks.

Results: 93 patients were assigned to the 10% povidone-iodine group and 95 patients to the Clotrimazole group. the response to treatment between groups. In the second week after treatment, 37.64% of the 10% povidone-iodine group and 40% of the Clotrimazole group had a good response to treatment (p = 0.551). In the fourth week after treatment, 52.69% of the 10% povidone-iodine group and 55.79% of the Clotrimazole group had a good response to treatment (p = 0.644). In the eighth week after treatment, 58.06% of the 10% povidone-iodine group and 64.21% of the Clotrimazole group had a good response to treatment (p = 0.642) In the 12th week after treatment, 76.34% of the 10% povidone-iodine group and 85.26% of the Clotrimazole group had a good response to treatment (p = 0.248).

Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the response to between 10% povidone-iodine and Clotrimazole groups in the second, fourth, eighth and twelfths after treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信