匈牙利家鸽大肠杆菌分离株的抗菌敏感性分析。

IF 2.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Pub Date : 2025-09-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fvets.2025.1642902
Ádám Kerek, Ábel Szabó, Ákos Jerzsele
{"title":"匈牙利家鸽大肠杆菌分离株的抗菌敏感性分析。","authors":"Ádám Kerek, Ábel Szabó, Ákos Jerzsele","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2025.1642902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study aimed to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of <i>Escherichia coli</i> isolates from domestic pigeons (Columba livia domestica) in Hungary.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 134 non-redundant isolates were obtained from oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs collected across multiple geographic regions. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using the microdilution method, following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined for a panel of antibiotics relevant to both veterinary and human medicine. Resistance patterns were analyzed using statistical tools including hierarchical clustering, network graph analysis, decision tree modeling, and Monte Carlo simulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains constituted 65.7% of the total, while extensive drug-resistant (XDR) and pan-drug-resistant (PDR) strains were found in 4.5% and 1.5% of isolates, respectively. The highest resistance rates were observed for neomycin (76.1%) and florfenicol (72.4%), whereas ceftriaxone and imipenem showed the lowest resistance rates (0.7% and 1.5%). Correlation analysis indicated notable associations between resistance to neomycin, doxycycline, and florfenicol, suggesting potential cross-resistance mechanisms. Monte Carlo simulation estimated an average MDR prevalence of 64.4% (95% CI: 50.0-77.6%). The high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among pigeon-derived <i>E. coli</i> isolates underscores the potential public health risks posed by avian reservoirs within the One Health context.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the need for enhanced AMR surveillance and responsible antibiotic stewardship in veterinary settings. Further molecular investigations are warranted to elucidate the genetic basis of resistance in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12772,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"1642902"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of <i>Escherichia coli</i> isolates from domestic pigeons in Hungary.\",\"authors\":\"Ádám Kerek, Ábel Szabó, Ákos Jerzsele\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fvets.2025.1642902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study aimed to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of <i>Escherichia coli</i> isolates from domestic pigeons (Columba livia domestica) in Hungary.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 134 non-redundant isolates were obtained from oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs collected across multiple geographic regions. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using the microdilution method, following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined for a panel of antibiotics relevant to both veterinary and human medicine. Resistance patterns were analyzed using statistical tools including hierarchical clustering, network graph analysis, decision tree modeling, and Monte Carlo simulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains constituted 65.7% of the total, while extensive drug-resistant (XDR) and pan-drug-resistant (PDR) strains were found in 4.5% and 1.5% of isolates, respectively. The highest resistance rates were observed for neomycin (76.1%) and florfenicol (72.4%), whereas ceftriaxone and imipenem showed the lowest resistance rates (0.7% and 1.5%). Correlation analysis indicated notable associations between resistance to neomycin, doxycycline, and florfenicol, suggesting potential cross-resistance mechanisms. Monte Carlo simulation estimated an average MDR prevalence of 64.4% (95% CI: 50.0-77.6%). The high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among pigeon-derived <i>E. coli</i> isolates underscores the potential public health risks posed by avian reservoirs within the One Health context.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the need for enhanced AMR surveillance and responsible antibiotic stewardship in veterinary settings. Further molecular investigations are warranted to elucidate the genetic basis of resistance in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Veterinary Science\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1642902\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464486/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Veterinary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1642902\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1642902","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本横断面观察性研究旨在确定匈牙利家鸽(Columba livia domestica)分离的大肠杆菌的抗菌敏感性谱。方法:从多个地理区域收集的口咽和肛肠拭子中获得134株非重复分离株。按照临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)的指导方针,采用微量稀释法进行抗菌药敏试验。最低抑制浓度(MIC)值确定了一组抗生素相关的兽药和人用药。利用分层聚类、网络图分析、决策树建模和蒙特卡罗模拟等统计工具对抗性模式进行分析。结果:多药耐药(MDR)株占65.7%,广泛耐药(XDR)株和泛耐药(PDR)株分别占4.5%和1.5%。耐药率最高的是新霉素(76.1%)和氟苯尼考(72.4%),最低的是头孢曲松和亚胺培南(0.7%和1.5%)。相关分析显示,对新霉素、强力霉素和氟苯尼考的耐药存在显著相关性,提示可能存在交叉耐药机制。蒙特卡罗模拟估计MDR的平均患病率为64.4% (95% CI: 50.0-77.6%)。鸽子来源的大肠杆菌分离株中抗菌素耐药性的高流行率强调了在“同一健康”背景下禽类宿主构成的潜在公共卫生风险。结论:这些发现强调了在兽医环境中加强抗生素耐药性监测和负责任的抗生素管理的必要性。进一步的分子研究是必要的,以阐明该群体的抗性遗传基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Escherichia coli isolates from domestic pigeons in Hungary.

Background: This cross-sectional observational study aimed to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Escherichia coli isolates from domestic pigeons (Columba livia domestica) in Hungary.

Methods: A total of 134 non-redundant isolates were obtained from oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs collected across multiple geographic regions. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using the microdilution method, following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined for a panel of antibiotics relevant to both veterinary and human medicine. Resistance patterns were analyzed using statistical tools including hierarchical clustering, network graph analysis, decision tree modeling, and Monte Carlo simulation.

Results: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains constituted 65.7% of the total, while extensive drug-resistant (XDR) and pan-drug-resistant (PDR) strains were found in 4.5% and 1.5% of isolates, respectively. The highest resistance rates were observed for neomycin (76.1%) and florfenicol (72.4%), whereas ceftriaxone and imipenem showed the lowest resistance rates (0.7% and 1.5%). Correlation analysis indicated notable associations between resistance to neomycin, doxycycline, and florfenicol, suggesting potential cross-resistance mechanisms. Monte Carlo simulation estimated an average MDR prevalence of 64.4% (95% CI: 50.0-77.6%). The high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among pigeon-derived E. coli isolates underscores the potential public health risks posed by avian reservoirs within the One Health context.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for enhanced AMR surveillance and responsible antibiotic stewardship in veterinary settings. Further molecular investigations are warranted to elucidate the genetic basis of resistance in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1870
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Veterinary Science is a global, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that bridges animal and human health, brings a comparative approach to medical and surgical challenges, and advances innovative biotechnology and therapy. Veterinary research today is interdisciplinary, collaborative, and socially relevant, transforming how we understand and investigate animal health and disease. Fundamental research in emerging infectious diseases, predictive genomics, stem cell therapy, and translational modelling is grounded within the integrative social context of public and environmental health, wildlife conservation, novel biomarkers, societal well-being, and cutting-edge clinical practice and specialization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science brings a 21st-century approach—networked, collaborative, and Open Access—to communicate this progress and innovation to both the specialist and to the wider audience of readers in the field. Frontiers in Veterinary Science publishes articles on outstanding discoveries across a wide spectrum of translational, foundational, and clinical research. The journal''s mission is to bring all relevant veterinary sciences together on a single platform with the goal of improving animal and human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信