电阻抗谱有助于脉冲场消融的定量深度监测:一种具有临床前验证的阻抗方法。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yuyi Guo, Rui Han, Rongrong Liu, Kai Zhu, Jinsong Guo, Junfeng Rao, Qun Wang, Qiancheng Zhao, Fukun Shi, Jie Zhuang
{"title":"电阻抗谱有助于脉冲场消融的定量深度监测:一种具有临床前验证的阻抗方法。","authors":"Yuyi Guo, Rui Han, Rongrong Liu, Kai Zhu, Jinsong Guo, Junfeng Rao, Qun Wang, Qiancheng Zhao, Fukun Shi, Jie Zhuang","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.09.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging therapy for cardiac ablation, where ablation depth (D) is critical to procedural success. However, real-time intraprocedural assessment of D remains a challenging task.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) has been proposed to predict ablation zone, but its applicability and mechanism for quantifying D is still unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Monopolar and bipolar PFA were conducted via two catheter types, along with in-situ EIS measurements. The change rate of low-frequency resistance (LFR), derived from Cole-Cole modeling of EIS data, was used to evaluate D in both in vitro (205 potato samples) and in vivo canine models (n=5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LFR versus ablation depths followed a classical Gompertz growth model within 0∼15 mm (R<sup>2</sup>=0.8789). A quadratic function provided a good fit for evaluating ablation depths within 1∼9 mm (R<sup>2</sup>=0.7561). Furthermore, LFR<sub>5min</sub> could detect a depth difference of approximately 0.8 mm in canine cardiac ablation (P=0.0003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LFR<sub>5min</sub> robustly correlated with PFA lesion depth, fitting quantitative quadratic and Gompertz models. Validated in vivo in a clinically relevant canine cardiac model, LFR<sub>5min</sub> resolved sub-millimeter depth differences, positioning it as a promising intraoperative metric for real-time PFA guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Facilitates Quantitative Depth Monitoring of Pulsed Field Ablation: An Impedimetric Approach with Preclinical Validation.\",\"authors\":\"Yuyi Guo, Rui Han, Rongrong Liu, Kai Zhu, Jinsong Guo, Junfeng Rao, Qun Wang, Qiancheng Zhao, Fukun Shi, Jie Zhuang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.09.034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging therapy for cardiac ablation, where ablation depth (D) is critical to procedural success. However, real-time intraprocedural assessment of D remains a challenging task.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) has been proposed to predict ablation zone, but its applicability and mechanism for quantifying D is still unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Monopolar and bipolar PFA were conducted via two catheter types, along with in-situ EIS measurements. The change rate of low-frequency resistance (LFR), derived from Cole-Cole modeling of EIS data, was used to evaluate D in both in vitro (205 potato samples) and in vivo canine models (n=5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LFR versus ablation depths followed a classical Gompertz growth model within 0∼15 mm (R<sup>2</sup>=0.8789). A quadratic function provided a good fit for evaluating ablation depths within 1∼9 mm (R<sup>2</sup>=0.7561). Furthermore, LFR<sub>5min</sub> could detect a depth difference of approximately 0.8 mm in canine cardiac ablation (P=0.0003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LFR<sub>5min</sub> robustly correlated with PFA lesion depth, fitting quantitative quadratic and Gompertz models. Validated in vivo in a clinically relevant canine cardiac model, LFR<sub>5min</sub> resolved sub-millimeter depth differences, positioning it as a promising intraoperative metric for real-time PFA guidance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.09.034\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.09.034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脉冲场消融(PFA)是一种新兴的心脏消融治疗方法,其中消融深度(D)是手术成功的关键。然而,D的实时程序内评估仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务。目的:电阻抗谱(EIS)被提出用于预测烧蚀区,但其量化D的适用性和机制尚不清楚。方法:单极和双极PFA通过两种导管进行,并进行原位EIS测量。利用EIS数据的Cole-Cole模型得出的低频电阻变化率(LFR),在体外(205份马铃薯样品)和犬体内模型(n=5)中对D进行评估。结果:LFR与消融深度在0 ~ 15 mm范围内符合经典Gompertz增长模型(R2=0.8789)。二次函数可以很好地拟合评价1 ~ 9 mm范围内的消融深度(R2=0.7561)。此外,LFR5min在犬心脏消融中可以检测到约0.8 mm的深度差异(P=0.0003)。结论:LFR5min与PFA病变深度有较强相关性,符合定量二次模型和Gompertz模型。在临床相关犬心脏模型的体内验证中,LFR5min解决了亚毫米深度差异,将其定位为有希望的术中实时PFA指导指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Facilitates Quantitative Depth Monitoring of Pulsed Field Ablation: An Impedimetric Approach with Preclinical Validation.

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging therapy for cardiac ablation, where ablation depth (D) is critical to procedural success. However, real-time intraprocedural assessment of D remains a challenging task.

Objective: Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) has been proposed to predict ablation zone, but its applicability and mechanism for quantifying D is still unclear.

Methods: Monopolar and bipolar PFA were conducted via two catheter types, along with in-situ EIS measurements. The change rate of low-frequency resistance (LFR), derived from Cole-Cole modeling of EIS data, was used to evaluate D in both in vitro (205 potato samples) and in vivo canine models (n=5).

Results: LFR versus ablation depths followed a classical Gompertz growth model within 0∼15 mm (R2=0.8789). A quadratic function provided a good fit for evaluating ablation depths within 1∼9 mm (R2=0.7561). Furthermore, LFR5min could detect a depth difference of approximately 0.8 mm in canine cardiac ablation (P=0.0003).

Conclusions: LFR5min robustly correlated with PFA lesion depth, fitting quantitative quadratic and Gompertz models. Validated in vivo in a clinically relevant canine cardiac model, LFR5min resolved sub-millimeter depth differences, positioning it as a promising intraoperative metric for real-time PFA guidance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信