MiniMed™780G推荐设置(血糖目标100mg /dL,胰岛素活性时间2小时)对青年和年轻1型糖尿病患者的实际疗效。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Frontiers in Endocrinology Pub Date : 2025-09-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fendo.2025.1670266
Marta Bassi, Giordano Spacco, Federico Pezzotta, Margherita Di Jorgi, Giulia Siri, Andrea Pintabona, Maria Grazia Calevo, Nicola Minuto, Mohamad Maghnie
{"title":"MiniMed™780G推荐设置(血糖目标100mg /dL,胰岛素活性时间2小时)对青年和年轻1型糖尿病患者的实际疗效。","authors":"Marta Bassi, Giordano Spacco, Federico Pezzotta, Margherita Di Jorgi, Giulia Siri, Andrea Pintabona, Maria Grazia Calevo, Nicola Minuto, Mohamad Maghnie","doi":"10.3389/fendo.2025.1670266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Despite growing evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of the MiniMed™ 780G recommended settings (Glucose Target 100 mg/dL and Active Insulin Time 2 hours), their adoption in routine practice remains limited, mainly due to concerns about hypoglycemia. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of switching to these settings in pediatric and young patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective longitudinal analysis in children and young adults using MiniMed™780G system at our center. Patients who switched from their initial settings to a glucose target of 100 mg/dL and an active insulin time of 2 hours for clinical indications were included. Data were retrospectively collected 3 months after switch. Glycemic metrics were compared over the 14 days before the switch (T0) and at 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-one patients with a mean age of 17.89y were included, 81.3% of whom already had a glucose target of 100 mg/dL at baseline. Therefore, in most cases the primary change was reducing AIT from 3 to 2 hours. After switching to the recommended settings, Time in Range (TIR) significantly increased (p<0.001) at T1 (71.9% <i>vs</i> 74.8%) and T3 (71.9% <i>vs</i> 75.0%). Time in target range (TITR) similarly improved from 47.2% at T0 to 51.4% at T1 and 50.9% at T3 (p<0.001) without any significant increase in time below range (TBR). The proportion of patients meeting all ADA-recommended glycemic targets rose from 29.5% at baseline to 40% at T3. Following the switch, the contribution of automatic correction boluses to the total insulin dose increased, while overall daily insulin requirements remained stable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Switching to the recommended MiniMed™780G settings, driven primarily by AIT reduction in most patients, was safe and effective, improving glycemic control without increasing hypoglycemia. These findings support broader use of these settings in pediatric and young adult patient with type 1 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12447,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1670266"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world efficacy of MiniMed™780G recommended settings (glycemic target 100 mg/dL, active insulin time 2 hours) in youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Marta Bassi, Giordano Spacco, Federico Pezzotta, Margherita Di Jorgi, Giulia Siri, Andrea Pintabona, Maria Grazia Calevo, Nicola Minuto, Mohamad Maghnie\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fendo.2025.1670266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Despite growing evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of the MiniMed™ 780G recommended settings (Glucose Target 100 mg/dL and Active Insulin Time 2 hours), their adoption in routine practice remains limited, mainly due to concerns about hypoglycemia. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of switching to these settings in pediatric and young patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective longitudinal analysis in children and young adults using MiniMed™780G system at our center. Patients who switched from their initial settings to a glucose target of 100 mg/dL and an active insulin time of 2 hours for clinical indications were included. Data were retrospectively collected 3 months after switch. Glycemic metrics were compared over the 14 days before the switch (T0) and at 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-one patients with a mean age of 17.89y were included, 81.3% of whom already had a glucose target of 100 mg/dL at baseline. Therefore, in most cases the primary change was reducing AIT from 3 to 2 hours. After switching to the recommended settings, Time in Range (TIR) significantly increased (p<0.001) at T1 (71.9% <i>vs</i> 74.8%) and T3 (71.9% <i>vs</i> 75.0%). Time in target range (TITR) similarly improved from 47.2% at T0 to 51.4% at T1 and 50.9% at T3 (p<0.001) without any significant increase in time below range (TBR). The proportion of patients meeting all ADA-recommended glycemic targets rose from 29.5% at baseline to 40% at T3. Following the switch, the contribution of automatic correction boluses to the total insulin dose increased, while overall daily insulin requirements remained stable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Switching to the recommended MiniMed™780G settings, driven primarily by AIT reduction in most patients, was safe and effective, improving glycemic control without increasing hypoglycemia. These findings support broader use of these settings in pediatric and young adult patient with type 1 diabetes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1670266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463605/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1670266\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1670266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:尽管越来越多的证据支持MiniMed™780G推荐设置(葡萄糖目标100mg /dL和活性胰岛素时间2小时)的有效性和安全性,但其在常规实践中的采用仍然有限,主要是由于对低血糖的担忧。本研究旨在评估转换到这些设置对儿科和年轻1型糖尿病患者(T1D)的影响。方法:我们在本中心使用MiniMed™780G系统对儿童和青少年进行回顾性纵向分析。包括从初始设置切换到100 mg/dL的葡萄糖目标和临床适应症的活性胰岛素时间为2小时的患者。转换后3个月回顾性收集数据。比较转换前14天(T0)、1个月(T1)和3个月(T3)的血糖指标。结果:纳入91例患者,平均年龄17.89岁,其中81.3%的患者在基线时血糖目标为100 mg/dL。因此,在大多数情况下,主要的变化是将AIT从3小时减少到2小时。切换到推荐设置后,Time in Range (TIR)显著增加(pv比74.8%),T3显著增加(71.9%比75.0%)。目标范围内时间(TITR)同样从T0时的47.2%改善到T1时的51.4%和T3时的50.9%。结论:大多数患者主要由AIT降低驱动,切换到推荐的MiniMed™780G设置是安全有效的,可以改善血糖控制而不增加低血糖。这些发现支持在1型糖尿病儿童和青年患者中更广泛地使用这些设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world efficacy of MiniMed™780G recommended settings (glycemic target 100 mg/dL, active insulin time 2 hours) in youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes.

Background and aims: Despite growing evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of the MiniMed™ 780G recommended settings (Glucose Target 100 mg/dL and Active Insulin Time 2 hours), their adoption in routine practice remains limited, mainly due to concerns about hypoglycemia. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of switching to these settings in pediatric and young patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal analysis in children and young adults using MiniMed™780G system at our center. Patients who switched from their initial settings to a glucose target of 100 mg/dL and an active insulin time of 2 hours for clinical indications were included. Data were retrospectively collected 3 months after switch. Glycemic metrics were compared over the 14 days before the switch (T0) and at 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T3).

Results: Ninety-one patients with a mean age of 17.89y were included, 81.3% of whom already had a glucose target of 100 mg/dL at baseline. Therefore, in most cases the primary change was reducing AIT from 3 to 2 hours. After switching to the recommended settings, Time in Range (TIR) significantly increased (p<0.001) at T1 (71.9% vs 74.8%) and T3 (71.9% vs 75.0%). Time in target range (TITR) similarly improved from 47.2% at T0 to 51.4% at T1 and 50.9% at T3 (p<0.001) without any significant increase in time below range (TBR). The proportion of patients meeting all ADA-recommended glycemic targets rose from 29.5% at baseline to 40% at T3. Following the switch, the contribution of automatic correction boluses to the total insulin dose increased, while overall daily insulin requirements remained stable.

Conclusions: Switching to the recommended MiniMed™780G settings, driven primarily by AIT reduction in most patients, was safe and effective, improving glycemic control without increasing hypoglycemia. These findings support broader use of these settings in pediatric and young adult patient with type 1 diabetes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Frontiers in Endocrinology Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
3023
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Endocrinology is a field journal of the "Frontiers in" journal series. In today’s world, endocrinology is becoming increasingly important as it underlies many of the challenges societies face - from obesity and diabetes to reproduction, population control and aging. Endocrinology covers a broad field from basic molecular and cellular communication through to clinical care and some of the most crucial public health issues. The journal, thus, welcomes outstanding contributions in any domain of endocrinology. Frontiers in Endocrinology publishes articles on the most outstanding discoveries across a wide research spectrum of Endocrinology. The mission of Frontiers in Endocrinology is to bring all relevant Endocrinology areas together on a single platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信