{"title":"进行性骨化纤维发育不良(FOP)药物治疗的II期和III期临床试验:疗效、安全性和治疗策略的挑战。","authors":"Mohammed S Alharthi","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S537454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) is a rare genetic disorder marked by progressive heterotopic ossification (HO), causing severe disability and reduced life expectancy. Despite advancements in understanding its pathophysiology, effective treatments remain limited. Promising pharmacological approaches include retinoic acid receptor γ (RARγ) agonists, such as palovarotene, and monoclonal antibodies targeting activin A, like garetosmab. However, the rarity of FOP complicates the generation of robust clinical evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review analysed data from Phase II and III clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, including completed and terminated interventional studies evaluating pharmacological treatments for FOP. Key trial details were systematically extracted and reviewed, including design, interventions, outcomes, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five trials met the inclusion criteria, focusing on palovarotene and garetosmab. Palovarotene significantly reduced HO progression, particularly during active disease phases or flare-ups. Garetosmab showed potential in preventing new HO lesions and reducing lesion activity. However, both treatments posed safety concerns, including premature epiphyseal fusion in younger patients (palovarotene) and systemic adverse events (garetosmab). Terminated trials revealed logistical and ethical challenges, such as recruitment difficulties, small sample sizes, and limitations of placebo-controlled designs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacological advances, including palovarotene and garetosmab, show promise in managing FOP. Nevertheless, safety concerns and the complexities of clinical trial implementation highlight the need for innovative approaches to ensure effective and equitable treatments. Future research should prioritise long-term safety, efficacy, and patient-centred outcomes to improve FOP management.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"8581-8588"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Narrative Review of Phase II and III Clinical Trials for the Pharmacological Treatment of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP): Efficacy, Safety, and Challenges in Treatment Strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed S Alharthi\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DDDT.S537454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) is a rare genetic disorder marked by progressive heterotopic ossification (HO), causing severe disability and reduced life expectancy. Despite advancements in understanding its pathophysiology, effective treatments remain limited. Promising pharmacological approaches include retinoic acid receptor γ (RARγ) agonists, such as palovarotene, and monoclonal antibodies targeting activin A, like garetosmab. However, the rarity of FOP complicates the generation of robust clinical evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review analysed data from Phase II and III clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, including completed and terminated interventional studies evaluating pharmacological treatments for FOP. Key trial details were systematically extracted and reviewed, including design, interventions, outcomes, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five trials met the inclusion criteria, focusing on palovarotene and garetosmab. Palovarotene significantly reduced HO progression, particularly during active disease phases or flare-ups. Garetosmab showed potential in preventing new HO lesions and reducing lesion activity. However, both treatments posed safety concerns, including premature epiphyseal fusion in younger patients (palovarotene) and systemic adverse events (garetosmab). Terminated trials revealed logistical and ethical challenges, such as recruitment difficulties, small sample sizes, and limitations of placebo-controlled designs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacological advances, including palovarotene and garetosmab, show promise in managing FOP. Nevertheless, safety concerns and the complexities of clinical trial implementation highlight the need for innovative approaches to ensure effective and equitable treatments. Future research should prioritise long-term safety, efficacy, and patient-centred outcomes to improve FOP management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"8581-8588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474705/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S537454\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S537454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Narrative Review of Phase II and III Clinical Trials for the Pharmacological Treatment of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP): Efficacy, Safety, and Challenges in Treatment Strategies.
Background: Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) is a rare genetic disorder marked by progressive heterotopic ossification (HO), causing severe disability and reduced life expectancy. Despite advancements in understanding its pathophysiology, effective treatments remain limited. Promising pharmacological approaches include retinoic acid receptor γ (RARγ) agonists, such as palovarotene, and monoclonal antibodies targeting activin A, like garetosmab. However, the rarity of FOP complicates the generation of robust clinical evidence.
Methods: This narrative review analysed data from Phase II and III clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, including completed and terminated interventional studies evaluating pharmacological treatments for FOP. Key trial details were systematically extracted and reviewed, including design, interventions, outcomes, and adverse events.
Results: Five trials met the inclusion criteria, focusing on palovarotene and garetosmab. Palovarotene significantly reduced HO progression, particularly during active disease phases or flare-ups. Garetosmab showed potential in preventing new HO lesions and reducing lesion activity. However, both treatments posed safety concerns, including premature epiphyseal fusion in younger patients (palovarotene) and systemic adverse events (garetosmab). Terminated trials revealed logistical and ethical challenges, such as recruitment difficulties, small sample sizes, and limitations of placebo-controlled designs.
Conclusion: Pharmacological advances, including palovarotene and garetosmab, show promise in managing FOP. Nevertheless, safety concerns and the complexities of clinical trial implementation highlight the need for innovative approaches to ensure effective and equitable treatments. Future research should prioritise long-term safety, efficacy, and patient-centred outcomes to improve FOP management.
期刊介绍:
Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications.
The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas.
Specific topics covered by the journal include:
Drug target identification and validation
Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution
Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways
New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery*
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes)
Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes
Fragment-based drug discovery
Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology
Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products**
Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development
Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing)
Preclinical development studies
Translational animal models
Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways
Toxicology
Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy
Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics
Clinical drug evaluation
Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.