Charlotte Both, Elena Bachinskaya, Laura Rose, Carol M Antequera, Jessica R Allegretti
{"title":"护士对Hyrimoz®Sensoready®自动注射器装置可用性的看法","authors":"Charlotte Both, Elena Bachinskaya, Laura Rose, Carol M Antequera, Jessica R Allegretti","doi":"10.7573/dic.2025-4-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyrimoz<sup>®</sup> (Sandoz adalimumab biosimilar) became available in the USA in July 2023, and is administered subcutaneously using a pre-filled autoinjector device, the Hyrimoz Sensoready<sup>®</sup> pen. As nurses are often responsible for training patients in the use of autoinjectors, this survey aimed to assess gastroenterology nurses' perceptions of autoinjectors in the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants included nurses in the USA currently working within a gastroenterology practice with experience managing inflammatory bowel disease and with reference to adalimumab, Humira<sup>®</sup>. Participants were sent the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen, which was opened during a web-assisted telephone interview. The survey assessed the importance of specified autoinjector device attributes as well as perceptions regarding both the Humira and Hyrimoz Sensoready autoinjector devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 nurses completed the survey. Participants rated simplicity of use, ease of performing self-injection, ease of learning to use the pen, ability to use an autoinjector pen independently and ease of preparation as the most important autoinjector attributes. When evaluating devices individually, participants awarded higher ratings to the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen over the Humira pen for all evaluated attributes. The greatest differences were reported for visual feedback mechanisms, ease of performing self-injection and the process to initiate injection. When directly comparing the devices, participants preferred the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen over the Humira pen overall, and for all individual attributes. Visual feedback and buttonless activation were the main qualitative features driving this overall preference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gastroenterology nurses in the USA expressed strong preferences for the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen <i>versus</i> the Humira pen when rating each device individually, and in direct quantitative and qualitative comparisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses' perceptions on the usability of the Hyrimoz<sup>®</sup> Sensoready<sup>®</sup> autoinjector device.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Both, Elena Bachinskaya, Laura Rose, Carol M Antequera, Jessica R Allegretti\",\"doi\":\"10.7573/dic.2025-4-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyrimoz<sup>®</sup> (Sandoz adalimumab biosimilar) became available in the USA in July 2023, and is administered subcutaneously using a pre-filled autoinjector device, the Hyrimoz Sensoready<sup>®</sup> pen. As nurses are often responsible for training patients in the use of autoinjectors, this survey aimed to assess gastroenterology nurses' perceptions of autoinjectors in the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants included nurses in the USA currently working within a gastroenterology practice with experience managing inflammatory bowel disease and with reference to adalimumab, Humira<sup>®</sup>. Participants were sent the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen, which was opened during a web-assisted telephone interview. The survey assessed the importance of specified autoinjector device attributes as well as perceptions regarding both the Humira and Hyrimoz Sensoready autoinjector devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 nurses completed the survey. Participants rated simplicity of use, ease of performing self-injection, ease of learning to use the pen, ability to use an autoinjector pen independently and ease of preparation as the most important autoinjector attributes. When evaluating devices individually, participants awarded higher ratings to the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen over the Humira pen for all evaluated attributes. The greatest differences were reported for visual feedback mechanisms, ease of performing self-injection and the process to initiate injection. When directly comparing the devices, participants preferred the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen over the Humira pen overall, and for all individual attributes. Visual feedback and buttonless activation were the main qualitative features driving this overall preference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gastroenterology nurses in the USA expressed strong preferences for the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen <i>versus</i> the Humira pen when rating each device individually, and in direct quantitative and qualitative comparisons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs in Context\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463172/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs in Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2025-4-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2025-4-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nurses' perceptions on the usability of the Hyrimoz® Sensoready® autoinjector device.
Background: Hyrimoz® (Sandoz adalimumab biosimilar) became available in the USA in July 2023, and is administered subcutaneously using a pre-filled autoinjector device, the Hyrimoz Sensoready® pen. As nurses are often responsible for training patients in the use of autoinjectors, this survey aimed to assess gastroenterology nurses' perceptions of autoinjectors in the USA.
Methods: Eligible participants included nurses in the USA currently working within a gastroenterology practice with experience managing inflammatory bowel disease and with reference to adalimumab, Humira®. Participants were sent the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen, which was opened during a web-assisted telephone interview. The survey assessed the importance of specified autoinjector device attributes as well as perceptions regarding both the Humira and Hyrimoz Sensoready autoinjector devices.
Results: A total of 123 nurses completed the survey. Participants rated simplicity of use, ease of performing self-injection, ease of learning to use the pen, ability to use an autoinjector pen independently and ease of preparation as the most important autoinjector attributes. When evaluating devices individually, participants awarded higher ratings to the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen over the Humira pen for all evaluated attributes. The greatest differences were reported for visual feedback mechanisms, ease of performing self-injection and the process to initiate injection. When directly comparing the devices, participants preferred the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen over the Humira pen overall, and for all individual attributes. Visual feedback and buttonless activation were the main qualitative features driving this overall preference.
Conclusion: Gastroenterology nurses in the USA expressed strong preferences for the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen versus the Humira pen when rating each device individually, and in direct quantitative and qualitative comparisons.
期刊介绍:
Covers all phases of original research: laboratory, animal and human/clinical studies, health economics and outcomes research, and postmarketing studies. Original research that shows positive or negative results are welcomed. Invited review articles may cover single-drug reviews, drug class reviews, latest advances in drug therapy, therapeutic-area reviews, place-in-therapy reviews, new pathways and classes of drugs. In addition, systematic reviews and meta-analyses are welcomed and may be published as original research if performed per accepted guidelines. Editorials of key topics and issues in drugs and therapeutics are welcomed. The Editor-in-Chief will also consider manuscripts of interest in areas such as technologies that support diagnosis, assessment and treatment. EQUATOR Network reporting guidelines should be followed for each article type. GPP3 Guidelines should be followed for any industry-sponsored manuscripts. Other Editorial sections may include Editorial, Case Report, Conference Report, Letter-to-the-Editor, Educational Section.