护士对Hyrimoz®Sensoready®自动注射器装置可用性的看法

IF 2.8 Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Drugs in Context Pub Date : 2025-09-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7573/dic.2025-4-1
Charlotte Both, Elena Bachinskaya, Laura Rose, Carol M Antequera, Jessica R Allegretti
{"title":"护士对Hyrimoz®Sensoready®自动注射器装置可用性的看法","authors":"Charlotte Both, Elena Bachinskaya, Laura Rose, Carol M Antequera, Jessica R Allegretti","doi":"10.7573/dic.2025-4-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyrimoz<sup>®</sup> (Sandoz adalimumab biosimilar) became available in the USA in July 2023, and is administered subcutaneously using a pre-filled autoinjector device, the Hyrimoz Sensoready<sup>®</sup> pen. As nurses are often responsible for training patients in the use of autoinjectors, this survey aimed to assess gastroenterology nurses' perceptions of autoinjectors in the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants included nurses in the USA currently working within a gastroenterology practice with experience managing inflammatory bowel disease and with reference to adalimumab, Humira<sup>®</sup>. Participants were sent the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen, which was opened during a web-assisted telephone interview. The survey assessed the importance of specified autoinjector device attributes as well as perceptions regarding both the Humira and Hyrimoz Sensoready autoinjector devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 nurses completed the survey. Participants rated simplicity of use, ease of performing self-injection, ease of learning to use the pen, ability to use an autoinjector pen independently and ease of preparation as the most important autoinjector attributes. When evaluating devices individually, participants awarded higher ratings to the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen over the Humira pen for all evaluated attributes. The greatest differences were reported for visual feedback mechanisms, ease of performing self-injection and the process to initiate injection. When directly comparing the devices, participants preferred the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen over the Humira pen overall, and for all individual attributes. Visual feedback and buttonless activation were the main qualitative features driving this overall preference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gastroenterology nurses in the USA expressed strong preferences for the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen <i>versus</i> the Humira pen when rating each device individually, and in direct quantitative and qualitative comparisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses' perceptions on the usability of the Hyrimoz<sup>®</sup> Sensoready<sup>®</sup> autoinjector device.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Both, Elena Bachinskaya, Laura Rose, Carol M Antequera, Jessica R Allegretti\",\"doi\":\"10.7573/dic.2025-4-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyrimoz<sup>®</sup> (Sandoz adalimumab biosimilar) became available in the USA in July 2023, and is administered subcutaneously using a pre-filled autoinjector device, the Hyrimoz Sensoready<sup>®</sup> pen. As nurses are often responsible for training patients in the use of autoinjectors, this survey aimed to assess gastroenterology nurses' perceptions of autoinjectors in the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants included nurses in the USA currently working within a gastroenterology practice with experience managing inflammatory bowel disease and with reference to adalimumab, Humira<sup>®</sup>. Participants were sent the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen, which was opened during a web-assisted telephone interview. The survey assessed the importance of specified autoinjector device attributes as well as perceptions regarding both the Humira and Hyrimoz Sensoready autoinjector devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 nurses completed the survey. Participants rated simplicity of use, ease of performing self-injection, ease of learning to use the pen, ability to use an autoinjector pen independently and ease of preparation as the most important autoinjector attributes. When evaluating devices individually, participants awarded higher ratings to the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen over the Humira pen for all evaluated attributes. The greatest differences were reported for visual feedback mechanisms, ease of performing self-injection and the process to initiate injection. When directly comparing the devices, participants preferred the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen over the Humira pen overall, and for all individual attributes. Visual feedback and buttonless activation were the main qualitative features driving this overall preference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gastroenterology nurses in the USA expressed strong preferences for the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen <i>versus</i> the Humira pen when rating each device individually, and in direct quantitative and qualitative comparisons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs in Context\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463172/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs in Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2025-4-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2025-4-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Hyrimoz®(山德士阿达木单抗生物类似药)于2023年7月在美国上市,使用预先填充的自动注射器装置Hyrimoz Sensoready®笔皮下给药。由于护士通常负责培训患者使用自动注射器,本调查旨在评估美国胃肠科护士对自动注射器的看法。方法:符合条件的参与者包括目前在美国胃肠病学实践中工作的护士,具有管理炎症性肠病的经验,并参考阿达木单抗,Humira®。参与者收到了Hyrimoz Sensoready笔,并在网络辅助电话采访中打开笔。该调查评估了指定自动注射器设备属性的重要性,以及对Humira和Hyrimoz Sensoready自动注射器设备的看法。结果:共有123名护士完成调查。参与者认为使用简单,易于进行自我注射,易于学习使用笔,能够独立使用自动注射器笔以及易于制备是最重要的自动注射器属性。当单独评估设备时,参与者在所有评估属性上都给予Hyrimoz Sensoready笔比Humira笔更高的评级。在视觉反馈机制、自我注射的容易程度和启动注射的过程方面,报告了最大的差异。当直接比较这些设备时,参与者更喜欢Hyrimoz Sensoready笔,而不是Humira笔,以及所有的个人属性。视觉反馈和无按钮激活是推动这一整体偏好的主要定性特征。结论:美国的胃肠病学护士在单独评估每种设备时,对Hyrimoz Sensoready笔和Humira笔表达了强烈的偏好,并进行了直接的定量和定性比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurses' perceptions on the usability of the Hyrimoz® Sensoready® autoinjector device.

Background: Hyrimoz® (Sandoz adalimumab biosimilar) became available in the USA in July 2023, and is administered subcutaneously using a pre-filled autoinjector device, the Hyrimoz Sensoready® pen. As nurses are often responsible for training patients in the use of autoinjectors, this survey aimed to assess gastroenterology nurses' perceptions of autoinjectors in the USA.

Methods: Eligible participants included nurses in the USA currently working within a gastroenterology practice with experience managing inflammatory bowel disease and with reference to adalimumab, Humira®. Participants were sent the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen, which was opened during a web-assisted telephone interview. The survey assessed the importance of specified autoinjector device attributes as well as perceptions regarding both the Humira and Hyrimoz Sensoready autoinjector devices.

Results: A total of 123 nurses completed the survey. Participants rated simplicity of use, ease of performing self-injection, ease of learning to use the pen, ability to use an autoinjector pen independently and ease of preparation as the most important autoinjector attributes. When evaluating devices individually, participants awarded higher ratings to the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen over the Humira pen for all evaluated attributes. The greatest differences were reported for visual feedback mechanisms, ease of performing self-injection and the process to initiate injection. When directly comparing the devices, participants preferred the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen over the Humira pen overall, and for all individual attributes. Visual feedback and buttonless activation were the main qualitative features driving this overall preference.

Conclusion: Gastroenterology nurses in the USA expressed strong preferences for the Hyrimoz Sensoready pen versus the Humira pen when rating each device individually, and in direct quantitative and qualitative comparisons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs in Context
Drugs in Context Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Covers all phases of original research: laboratory, animal and human/clinical studies, health economics and outcomes research, and postmarketing studies. Original research that shows positive or negative results are welcomed. Invited review articles may cover single-drug reviews, drug class reviews, latest advances in drug therapy, therapeutic-area reviews, place-in-therapy reviews, new pathways and classes of drugs. In addition, systematic reviews and meta-analyses are welcomed and may be published as original research if performed per accepted guidelines. Editorials of key topics and issues in drugs and therapeutics are welcomed. The Editor-in-Chief will also consider manuscripts of interest in areas such as technologies that support diagnosis, assessment and treatment. EQUATOR Network reporting guidelines should be followed for each article type. GPP3 Guidelines should be followed for any industry-sponsored manuscripts. Other Editorial sections may include Editorial, Case Report, Conference Report, Letter-to-the-Editor, Educational Section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信