了解不想要的:一项基于互联网的抑郁症干预的负面影响的混合方法研究。

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Friederike Fenski, Manuel Heinrich, Carmen Schaeuffele, Pavle Zagorscak, Christine Knaevelsrud, Johanna Boettcher
{"title":"了解不想要的:一项基于互联网的抑郁症干预的负面影响的混合方法研究。","authors":"Friederike Fenski, Manuel Heinrich, Carmen Schaeuffele, Pavle Zagorscak, Christine Knaevelsrud, Johanna Boettcher","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2565674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Internet-based interventions (IBIs) are effective for treating depression, but they can also lead to negative effects in some participants. There is no consensus on which specific characteristics of negative effects clinicians and researchers should focus on. Studies often combine distinct (sub)categories of negative effects, complicating interpretation. This study aimed to identify specific (sub)categories of negative effects related to depression and adherence and explore their predictors. In a sample of participants undergoing an IBI for depression (<i>N</i> = 1610; 61% female), 113 participants (7%) reported experiencing at least one negative effect. 110 participants qualitatively reported negative effects and were categorized into a framework consisting of two main categories (treatment-related vs. patient-related) of negative effects, divided into five subcategories (format, contact, implementation, symptoms, and insight). No differences in adherence were observed between any (sub)categories of negative effects; however, participants who reported treatment-related negative effects showed significantly lower symptom improvement than those reporting patient-related negative effects. No patient demographic characteristics predicted any negative effects. Differentiating treatment- and patient-related negative effects could enhance future research and intervention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the unwanted: a mixed-methods study on negative effects in an internet-based intervention for depression.\",\"authors\":\"Friederike Fenski, Manuel Heinrich, Carmen Schaeuffele, Pavle Zagorscak, Christine Knaevelsrud, Johanna Boettcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16506073.2025.2565674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Internet-based interventions (IBIs) are effective for treating depression, but they can also lead to negative effects in some participants. There is no consensus on which specific characteristics of negative effects clinicians and researchers should focus on. Studies often combine distinct (sub)categories of negative effects, complicating interpretation. This study aimed to identify specific (sub)categories of negative effects related to depression and adherence and explore their predictors. In a sample of participants undergoing an IBI for depression (<i>N</i> = 1610; 61% female), 113 participants (7%) reported experiencing at least one negative effect. 110 participants qualitatively reported negative effects and were categorized into a framework consisting of two main categories (treatment-related vs. patient-related) of negative effects, divided into five subcategories (format, contact, implementation, symptoms, and insight). No differences in adherence were observed between any (sub)categories of negative effects; however, participants who reported treatment-related negative effects showed significantly lower symptom improvement than those reporting patient-related negative effects. No patient demographic characteristics predicted any negative effects. Differentiating treatment- and patient-related negative effects could enhance future research and intervention efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2565674\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2565674","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于互联网的干预(IBIs)对治疗抑郁症是有效的,但它们也会对一些参与者产生负面影响。临床医生和研究人员应该关注哪些负面影响的具体特征,目前还没有达成共识。研究经常结合不同的(子)类别的负面影响,复杂的解释。本研究旨在确定与抑郁和依从性相关的特定(亚)类别的负面影响,并探讨其预测因素。在接受IBI治疗抑郁症的参与者样本中(N = 1610; 61%为女性),113名参与者(7%)报告至少经历过一次负面影响。110名参与者定性地报告了负面影响,并将其归类到一个框架中,该框架由两大类(与治疗相关的vs.与患者相关的)负面影响组成,又分为五个子类别(形式、接触、实施、症状和洞察力)。在任何(亚)类别的负面影响之间,没有观察到依从性的差异;然而,报告治疗相关负面影响的参与者的症状改善明显低于报告患者相关负面影响的参与者。没有患者人口统计学特征预测有任何负面影响。区分治疗和患者相关的负面影响可以加强未来的研究和干预工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the unwanted: a mixed-methods study on negative effects in an internet-based intervention for depression.

Internet-based interventions (IBIs) are effective for treating depression, but they can also lead to negative effects in some participants. There is no consensus on which specific characteristics of negative effects clinicians and researchers should focus on. Studies often combine distinct (sub)categories of negative effects, complicating interpretation. This study aimed to identify specific (sub)categories of negative effects related to depression and adherence and explore their predictors. In a sample of participants undergoing an IBI for depression (N = 1610; 61% female), 113 participants (7%) reported experiencing at least one negative effect. 110 participants qualitatively reported negative effects and were categorized into a framework consisting of two main categories (treatment-related vs. patient-related) of negative effects, divided into five subcategories (format, contact, implementation, symptoms, and insight). No differences in adherence were observed between any (sub)categories of negative effects; however, participants who reported treatment-related negative effects showed significantly lower symptom improvement than those reporting patient-related negative effects. No patient demographic characteristics predicted any negative effects. Differentiating treatment- and patient-related negative effects could enhance future research and intervention efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the application of behavioural and cognitive sciences to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The journal publishes state-of-the-art scientific articles within: - clinical and health psychology - psychopathology - behavioural medicine - assessment - treatment - theoretical issues pertinent to behavioural, cognitive and combined cognitive behavioural therapies With the number of high quality contributions increasing, the journal has been able to maintain a rapid publication schedule, providing readers with the latest research in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信