三种吸入方式与海洛因皮下注射热板镇痛效果比较。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Yawen Xu, Qinghua Liu, Yuanyuan Chen, Simeng Zhang, Dan Wang, Bin Di, Peng Xu, Cheng Jiang, Xiangyu Li
{"title":"三种吸入方式与海洛因皮下注射热板镇痛效果比较。","authors":"Yawen Xu, Qinghua Liu, Yuanyuan Chen, Simeng Zhang, Dan Wang, Bin Di, Peng Xu, Cheng Jiang, Xiangyu Li","doi":"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heroin, a widely abused opioid, is frequently consumed via inhalation; however, the majority of existing studies have focused on traditional administrations. This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of heroin across different deliveries to elucidate the unique characteristics of inhalation. Two distinct inhalation exposure systems (nasal and systemic) were established and validated for stability. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to quantify blood concentrations of heroin and its metabolite 6-monoacetylmorphine following subcutaneous injection and three intratracheal/inhalation administrations, establishing dose-concentration linearity for cross-comparison at equivalent blood concentration levels. The analgesic of heroin across four different administrations were assessed by the hot plate pain test while comparing outcomes based on both blood and intracerebral drug concentrations. The findings indicated that both inhalation systems exhibited stable drug delivery, with linear correlations between exposure chamber concentration, administered dose, and resultant blood concentration. A logarithmic correlation was identified between the administration duration and blood concentration levels. Analgesic assessments revealed that significantly enhanced effects in both inhalation groups compared to subcutaneous injection, despite lower delivered doses. At the median effective dose (ED 50 ), olfactory bulb drug concentrations in inhalation were approximately eight-fold higher than in subcutaneous and intratracheal groups, while blood concentrations showed no statistical difference. This study validated that inhaled heroin produces stronger analgesic effects than subcutaneous injection, likely attributed to the mechanism of direct brain entry via the olfactory pathway, which enhances psychoactive potency. These findings highlight the distinct pharmacological properties of inhaled heroin, providing critical insights into its abuse potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":8832,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the hot-plate pain effect between three inhalation methods and subcutaneous injection of heroin.\",\"authors\":\"Yawen Xu, Qinghua Liu, Yuanyuan Chen, Simeng Zhang, Dan Wang, Bin Di, Peng Xu, Cheng Jiang, Xiangyu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Heroin, a widely abused opioid, is frequently consumed via inhalation; however, the majority of existing studies have focused on traditional administrations. This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of heroin across different deliveries to elucidate the unique characteristics of inhalation. Two distinct inhalation exposure systems (nasal and systemic) were established and validated for stability. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to quantify blood concentrations of heroin and its metabolite 6-monoacetylmorphine following subcutaneous injection and three intratracheal/inhalation administrations, establishing dose-concentration linearity for cross-comparison at equivalent blood concentration levels. The analgesic of heroin across four different administrations were assessed by the hot plate pain test while comparing outcomes based on both blood and intracerebral drug concentrations. The findings indicated that both inhalation systems exhibited stable drug delivery, with linear correlations between exposure chamber concentration, administered dose, and resultant blood concentration. A logarithmic correlation was identified between the administration duration and blood concentration levels. Analgesic assessments revealed that significantly enhanced effects in both inhalation groups compared to subcutaneous injection, despite lower delivered doses. At the median effective dose (ED 50 ), olfactory bulb drug concentrations in inhalation were approximately eight-fold higher than in subcutaneous and intratracheal groups, while blood concentrations showed no statistical difference. This study validated that inhaled heroin produces stronger analgesic effects than subcutaneous injection, likely attributed to the mechanism of direct brain entry via the olfactory pathway, which enhances psychoactive potency. These findings highlight the distinct pharmacological properties of inhaled heroin, providing critical insights into its abuse potential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000854\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海洛因是一种被广泛滥用的阿片类药物,经常通过吸入摄入;然而,现有的大多数研究都集中在传统的管理方法上。本研究旨在比较海洛因在不同给药方式下的镇痛效果,以阐明吸入的独特特征。建立并验证了两种不同的吸入暴露系统(鼻腔和全身)的稳定性。采用液相色谱-串联质谱法定量海洛因及其代谢物6-单乙酰吗啡在皮下注射和三次气管内/吸入后的血药浓度,建立剂量-浓度线性关系,以便在同等血药浓度水平下进行交叉比较。通过热板疼痛试验评估四种不同给药方式对海洛因的镇痛作用,并比较基于血液和脑内药物浓度的结果。研究结果表明,两种吸入系统均表现出稳定的药物输送,暴露室浓度、给药剂量和最终血药浓度之间呈线性相关。在给药时间和血药浓度水平之间确定了对数相关性。镇痛评估显示,尽管给药剂量较低,但与皮下注射相比,两组吸入组的效果均显著增强。在中位有效剂量(ED50)下,吸入嗅球药物浓度约为皮下和气管内组的8倍,而血药浓度无统计学差异。本研究证实,海洛因吸入比皮下注射具有更强的镇痛作用,可能是通过嗅觉途径直接进入大脑,从而增强精神活性的机制。这些发现强调了吸入海洛因的独特药理特性,为其滥用潜力提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the hot-plate pain effect between three inhalation methods and subcutaneous injection of heroin.

Heroin, a widely abused opioid, is frequently consumed via inhalation; however, the majority of existing studies have focused on traditional administrations. This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of heroin across different deliveries to elucidate the unique characteristics of inhalation. Two distinct inhalation exposure systems (nasal and systemic) were established and validated for stability. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to quantify blood concentrations of heroin and its metabolite 6-monoacetylmorphine following subcutaneous injection and three intratracheal/inhalation administrations, establishing dose-concentration linearity for cross-comparison at equivalent blood concentration levels. The analgesic of heroin across four different administrations were assessed by the hot plate pain test while comparing outcomes based on both blood and intracerebral drug concentrations. The findings indicated that both inhalation systems exhibited stable drug delivery, with linear correlations between exposure chamber concentration, administered dose, and resultant blood concentration. A logarithmic correlation was identified between the administration duration and blood concentration levels. Analgesic assessments revealed that significantly enhanced effects in both inhalation groups compared to subcutaneous injection, despite lower delivered doses. At the median effective dose (ED 50 ), olfactory bulb drug concentrations in inhalation were approximately eight-fold higher than in subcutaneous and intratracheal groups, while blood concentrations showed no statistical difference. This study validated that inhaled heroin produces stronger analgesic effects than subcutaneous injection, likely attributed to the mechanism of direct brain entry via the olfactory pathway, which enhances psychoactive potency. These findings highlight the distinct pharmacological properties of inhaled heroin, providing critical insights into its abuse potential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Pharmacology
Behavioural Pharmacology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Pharmacology accepts original full and short research reports in diverse areas ranging from ethopharmacology to the pharmacology of schedule-controlled operant behaviour, provided that their primary focus is behavioural. Suitable topics include drug, chemical and hormonal effects on behaviour, the neurochemical mechanisms under-lying behaviour, and behavioural methods for the study of drug action. Both animal and human studies are welcome; however, studies reporting neurochemical data should have a predominantly behavioural focus, and human studies should not consist exclusively of clinical trials or case reports. Preference is given to studies that demonstrate and develop the potential of behavioural methods, and to papers reporting findings of direct relevance to clinical problems. Papers making a significant theoretical contribution are particularly welcome and, where possible and merited, space is made available for authors to explore fully the theoretical implications of their findings. Reviews of an area of the literature or at an appropriate stage in the development of an author’s own work are welcome. Commentaries in areas of current interest are also considered for publication, as are Reviews and Commentaries in areas outside behavioural pharmacology, but of importance and interest to behavioural pharmacologists. Behavioural Pharmacology publishes frequent Special Issues on current hot topics. The editors welcome correspondence about whether a paper in preparation might be suitable for inclusion in a Special Issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信