评价Instagram上母乳喂养相关信息的准确性和质量。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Aya Bou Fakhreddine, Samer Bou Karroum
{"title":"评价Instagram上母乳喂养相关信息的准确性和质量。","authors":"Aya Bou Fakhreddine, Samer Bou Karroum","doi":"10.1177/15568253251383914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Social media platforms, particularly Instagram, are increasingly used by new and expecting parents to seek health-related information, including guidance on breastfeeding. While this offers opportunities for accessible support, concerns persist regarding the accuracy and quality of content shared online. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and general quality of breastfeeding-related information shared on Instagram and to examine how these attributes vary by post characteristics, including format, content topic, and account type. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using 80 top-performing Instagram posts identified through four popular breastfeeding-related hashtags. Posts were manually screened and assessed for eligibility. Accuracy was evaluated against official guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, World Health Organization, and American Academy of Pediatrics using a 4-point scale. General quality was assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), a validated 5-point tool. Ordered logistic regression was used to assess associations between post characteristics and outcomes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 38.8% of posts were completely accurate, while 36.3% were either mostly or completely inaccurate. The mean accuracy score was 3.7 (SD = 1.41), and the mean GQS was 4.0 (SD = 1.03). Image-based posts were significantly more accurate than videos (odds ratio [OR] = 2.52; 95% CI: 1.11-5.74), and posts by health care professionals had significantly higher quality scores (OR = 5.23; 95% CI: 1.66-16.54). Accuracy and quality scores were strongly correlated (ρ = 0.68, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> While Instagram can serve as a valuable platform for breastfeeding education, content quality and accuracy vary widely. Posts by health care professionals tend to be more reliable. Public health efforts should focus on amplifying evidence-based content and mitigating misinformation to better support maternal and child health online.</p>","PeriodicalId":9142,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of Breastfeeding-Related Information on Instagram.\",\"authors\":\"Aya Bou Fakhreddine, Samer Bou Karroum\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15568253251383914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Social media platforms, particularly Instagram, are increasingly used by new and expecting parents to seek health-related information, including guidance on breastfeeding. While this offers opportunities for accessible support, concerns persist regarding the accuracy and quality of content shared online. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and general quality of breastfeeding-related information shared on Instagram and to examine how these attributes vary by post characteristics, including format, content topic, and account type. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using 80 top-performing Instagram posts identified through four popular breastfeeding-related hashtags. Posts were manually screened and assessed for eligibility. Accuracy was evaluated against official guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, World Health Organization, and American Academy of Pediatrics using a 4-point scale. General quality was assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), a validated 5-point tool. Ordered logistic regression was used to assess associations between post characteristics and outcomes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 38.8% of posts were completely accurate, while 36.3% were either mostly or completely inaccurate. The mean accuracy score was 3.7 (SD = 1.41), and the mean GQS was 4.0 (SD = 1.03). Image-based posts were significantly more accurate than videos (odds ratio [OR] = 2.52; 95% CI: 1.11-5.74), and posts by health care professionals had significantly higher quality scores (OR = 5.23; 95% CI: 1.66-16.54). Accuracy and quality scores were strongly correlated (ρ = 0.68, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> While Instagram can serve as a valuable platform for breastfeeding education, content quality and accuracy vary widely. Posts by health care professionals tend to be more reliable. Public health efforts should focus on amplifying evidence-based content and mitigating misinformation to better support maternal and child health online.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breastfeeding Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breastfeeding Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15568253251383914\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15568253251383914","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新父母和准父母越来越多地使用社交媒体平台,特别是Instagram来寻求与健康相关的信息,包括母乳喂养指导。虽然这为可访问的支持提供了机会,但人们仍然关注在线共享内容的准确性和质量。目的:本研究旨在评估Instagram上分享的母乳喂养相关信息的准确性和总体质量,并研究这些属性如何随帖子特征(包括格式、内容主题和账户类型)而变化。方法:通过四个流行的母乳喂养相关标签,对80个表现最好的Instagram帖子进行了横断面观察研究。员额是手工筛选和评估资格的。根据疾病控制和预防中心、世界卫生组织和美国儿科学会的官方指导方针,使用4分制对准确性进行评估。使用全球质量量表(GQS)评估总体质量,这是一个经过验证的5点工具。使用有序逻辑回归来评估岗位特征与结果之间的关联。结果:总体而言,38.8%的帖子完全准确,36.3%的帖子大部分或完全不准确。平均准确率为3.7 (SD = 1.41),平均GQS为4.0 (SD = 1.03)。基于图像的帖子明显比视频更准确(比值比[OR] = 2.52; 95% CI: 1.11-5.74),卫生保健专业人员的帖子质量得分明显更高(OR = 5.23; 95% CI: 1.66-16.54)。准确度与质量评分呈强相关(ρ = 0.68, p < 0.001)。结论:Instagram可以作为母乳喂养教育的重要平台,但内容质量和准确性差异较大。保健专业人员的职位往往更可靠。公共卫生工作应侧重于扩大循证内容和减少错误信息,以更好地支持在线妇幼保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of Breastfeeding-Related Information on Instagram.

Background: Social media platforms, particularly Instagram, are increasingly used by new and expecting parents to seek health-related information, including guidance on breastfeeding. While this offers opportunities for accessible support, concerns persist regarding the accuracy and quality of content shared online. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and general quality of breastfeeding-related information shared on Instagram and to examine how these attributes vary by post characteristics, including format, content topic, and account type. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using 80 top-performing Instagram posts identified through four popular breastfeeding-related hashtags. Posts were manually screened and assessed for eligibility. Accuracy was evaluated against official guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, World Health Organization, and American Academy of Pediatrics using a 4-point scale. General quality was assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), a validated 5-point tool. Ordered logistic regression was used to assess associations between post characteristics and outcomes. Results: Overall, 38.8% of posts were completely accurate, while 36.3% were either mostly or completely inaccurate. The mean accuracy score was 3.7 (SD = 1.41), and the mean GQS was 4.0 (SD = 1.03). Image-based posts were significantly more accurate than videos (odds ratio [OR] = 2.52; 95% CI: 1.11-5.74), and posts by health care professionals had significantly higher quality scores (OR = 5.23; 95% CI: 1.66-16.54). Accuracy and quality scores were strongly correlated (ρ = 0.68, p < 0.001). Conclusion: While Instagram can serve as a valuable platform for breastfeeding education, content quality and accuracy vary widely. Posts by health care professionals tend to be more reliable. Public health efforts should focus on amplifying evidence-based content and mitigating misinformation to better support maternal and child health online.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breastfeeding Medicine
Breastfeeding Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding Medicine provides unparalleled peer-reviewed research, protocols, and clinical applications to ensure optimal care for mother and infant. The Journal answers the growing demand for evidence-based research and explores the immediate and long-term outcomes of breastfeeding, including its epidemiologic, physiologic, and psychological benefits. It is the exclusive source of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine protocols. Breastfeeding Medicine coverage includes: Breastfeeding recommendations and protocols Health consequences of artificial feeding Physiology of lactation and biochemistry of breast milk Optimal nutrition for the breastfeeding mother Breastfeeding indications and contraindications Managing breastfeeding discomfort, pain, and other complications Breastfeeding the premature or sick infant Breastfeeding in the chronically ill mother Management of the breastfeeding mother on medication Infectious disease transmission through breast milk and breastfeeding The collection and storage of human milk and human milk banking Measuring the impact of being a “baby-friendly” hospital Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity International public health issues including social and economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信