使用智能农场工具确定关键的农业实践,以改善卢森堡农业部门与大气相关的可持续性绩效。

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Evelyne Stoll, Sabine Keßler, Laura Leimbrock-Rosch, Torsten Bohn, Rachel Reckinger, Christian Schader, Christian Herzig, Stéphanie Zimmer
{"title":"使用智能农场工具确定关键的农业实践,以改善卢森堡农业部门与大气相关的可持续性绩效。","authors":"Evelyne Stoll, Sabine Keßler, Laura Leimbrock-Rosch, Torsten Bohn, Rachel Reckinger, Christian Schader, Christian Herzig, Stéphanie Zimmer","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Agriculture is a major source of environmental emissions, including greenhouse gases (GHG), ammonia and other air pollutant emissions, particularly in livestock-intensive countries such as Luxembourg. Organic agriculture has attracted attention as a more environmentally friendly agricultural management system. This study assessed the atmosphere-related sustainability performance of 87 farms (4.5 % of all farms in Luxembourg) using the Sustainability Monitoring and Assessment RouTine (SMART)-Farm Tool, which operationalizes the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO)'s Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture Systems (SAFA) Guidelines. The sample included 58 conventional and 29 organic farms. Results showed that organically managed farms (orgF) achieved significantly higher sustainability scores than conventional farms (conF) in the Atmosphere theme (orgF mean: 63.8 %, conF mean: 56.6 %, p < 0.001), as well as in the sub-themes Air Quality (orgF mean: 69.3 %, conF mean: 59.1 %, p < 0.001) and Greenhouse Gases (orgF mean: 57.7 %, conF mean: 53.5 %, p = 0.002). Indicator-level analysis identified two key improvement strategies: (1) increasing concentrated feed autarky, with organic farms relying less on external protein and energy feeds; and (2) closing nutrient cycles, evidenced by higher use of legumes, green cover, and lower nitrogen inputs. These practices were strongly associated with improved atmospheric sustainability performance. Additionally, practices such as reduced tillage and cover cropping were underutilized across all systems, indicating broader areas for optimisation. While organic management outperformed conventional, the findings emphasize that many beneficial practices can be adopted system-independently. Policy efforts should focus on supporting these two linchpin strategies to trigger the development of a more sustainable farming system in Luxembourg and increase the sector's atmosphere-related sustainability performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"394 ","pages":"127426"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the SMART-Farm Tool to identify linchpin farming practices for the improvement of the atmosphere-related sustainability performance of the Luxembourgish agriculture sector.\",\"authors\":\"Evelyne Stoll, Sabine Keßler, Laura Leimbrock-Rosch, Torsten Bohn, Rachel Reckinger, Christian Schader, Christian Herzig, Stéphanie Zimmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Agriculture is a major source of environmental emissions, including greenhouse gases (GHG), ammonia and other air pollutant emissions, particularly in livestock-intensive countries such as Luxembourg. Organic agriculture has attracted attention as a more environmentally friendly agricultural management system. This study assessed the atmosphere-related sustainability performance of 87 farms (4.5 % of all farms in Luxembourg) using the Sustainability Monitoring and Assessment RouTine (SMART)-Farm Tool, which operationalizes the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO)'s Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture Systems (SAFA) Guidelines. The sample included 58 conventional and 29 organic farms. Results showed that organically managed farms (orgF) achieved significantly higher sustainability scores than conventional farms (conF) in the Atmosphere theme (orgF mean: 63.8 %, conF mean: 56.6 %, p < 0.001), as well as in the sub-themes Air Quality (orgF mean: 69.3 %, conF mean: 59.1 %, p < 0.001) and Greenhouse Gases (orgF mean: 57.7 %, conF mean: 53.5 %, p = 0.002). Indicator-level analysis identified two key improvement strategies: (1) increasing concentrated feed autarky, with organic farms relying less on external protein and energy feeds; and (2) closing nutrient cycles, evidenced by higher use of legumes, green cover, and lower nitrogen inputs. These practices were strongly associated with improved atmospheric sustainability performance. Additionally, practices such as reduced tillage and cover cropping were underutilized across all systems, indicating broader areas for optimisation. While organic management outperformed conventional, the findings emphasize that many beneficial practices can be adopted system-independently. Policy efforts should focus on supporting these two linchpin strategies to trigger the development of a more sustainable farming system in Luxembourg and increase the sector's atmosphere-related sustainability performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"394 \",\"pages\":\"127426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127426\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127426","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业是环境排放的主要来源,包括温室气体、氨和其他空气污染物的排放,特别是在卢森堡等畜牧业密集型国家。有机农业作为一种更加环保的农业经营体系而受到人们的关注。本研究使用可持续性监测和评估程序(SMART)农场工具评估了87个农场(占卢森堡所有农场的4.5%)的大气相关可持续性绩效,该工具实施了联合国粮食及农业组织(粮农组织)的粮食和农业系统可持续性评估(SAFA)指南。样本包括58个传统农场和29个有机农场。结果表明,有机管理农场(orgF)在大气主题方面的可持续性得分明显高于传统农场(conF)(有机农场平均值:63.8%,conF平均值:56.6%,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using the SMART-Farm Tool to identify linchpin farming practices for the improvement of the atmosphere-related sustainability performance of the Luxembourgish agriculture sector.

Agriculture is a major source of environmental emissions, including greenhouse gases (GHG), ammonia and other air pollutant emissions, particularly in livestock-intensive countries such as Luxembourg. Organic agriculture has attracted attention as a more environmentally friendly agricultural management system. This study assessed the atmosphere-related sustainability performance of 87 farms (4.5 % of all farms in Luxembourg) using the Sustainability Monitoring and Assessment RouTine (SMART)-Farm Tool, which operationalizes the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO)'s Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture Systems (SAFA) Guidelines. The sample included 58 conventional and 29 organic farms. Results showed that organically managed farms (orgF) achieved significantly higher sustainability scores than conventional farms (conF) in the Atmosphere theme (orgF mean: 63.8 %, conF mean: 56.6 %, p < 0.001), as well as in the sub-themes Air Quality (orgF mean: 69.3 %, conF mean: 59.1 %, p < 0.001) and Greenhouse Gases (orgF mean: 57.7 %, conF mean: 53.5 %, p = 0.002). Indicator-level analysis identified two key improvement strategies: (1) increasing concentrated feed autarky, with organic farms relying less on external protein and energy feeds; and (2) closing nutrient cycles, evidenced by higher use of legumes, green cover, and lower nitrogen inputs. These practices were strongly associated with improved atmospheric sustainability performance. Additionally, practices such as reduced tillage and cover cropping were underutilized across all systems, indicating broader areas for optimisation. While organic management outperformed conventional, the findings emphasize that many beneficial practices can be adopted system-independently. Policy efforts should focus on supporting these two linchpin strategies to trigger the development of a more sustainable farming system in Luxembourg and increase the sector's atmosphere-related sustainability performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信