专家启发,为沿海管理决策提供信息,以减轻未来的危害。

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Davina L Passeri, Matthew Richardson, Julien Martin, Simeon Yurek, Karim Alizad, Matthew V Bilskie, James Flocks, Donya Frank-Gilchrist, Robert L Jenkins, Rangley C Mickey, Margaret L Palmsten, Christopher G Smith, Kathryn E L Smith, Sara L Zeigler
{"title":"专家启发,为沿海管理决策提供信息,以减轻未来的危害。","authors":"Davina L Passeri, Matthew Richardson, Julien Martin, Simeon Yurek, Karim Alizad, Matthew V Bilskie, James Flocks, Donya Frank-Gilchrist, Robert L Jenkins, Rangley C Mickey, Margaret L Palmsten, Christopher G Smith, Kathryn E L Smith, Sara L Zeigler","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A scientific expert elicitation was conducted to address the feasibility of restoring coastal environments in response to future hazards to best meet management objectives. Subject matter experts produced probabilistic estimates of coastal change metrics used to evaluate decision objectives and alternatives informed by a stakeholder advisory group. Changes in salt marsh extents, storm surge flooding and barrier island morphology by the year 2050 were estimated for three scenarios of management actions (no action, interior headland restoration, beach and dune nourishment), while also considering the effects of future sea level rise (SLR). Collectively the participants were confident in their expectations of increased storm surge flooding with SLR, regardless of management interventions. Estimates of marsh response had large uncertainty, but experts generally hypothesized that marsh area would decrease with increasing SLR if no action was taken, especially in areas already experiencing marsh deterioration. There was agreement that dune heights and barrier island widths would decrease with SLR if no action was taken. Experts felt that beach and dune nourishment may reduce the amount of erosion under future SLR. All experts recognized the dynamic effects of SLR and feedback between bio-geo-physical processes that govern coastal systems. Participants agreed that size and location of management actions were important factors for influencing the coastal response. Expert elicitation is novel in the context of coastal management decision making and can be a useful tool for informing future scientific needs and providing rapid results to end users to inform reallocation of resources surrounding research and application.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"394 ","pages":"127447"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An expert elicitation to inform coastal management decision-making for mitigating future hazards.\",\"authors\":\"Davina L Passeri, Matthew Richardson, Julien Martin, Simeon Yurek, Karim Alizad, Matthew V Bilskie, James Flocks, Donya Frank-Gilchrist, Robert L Jenkins, Rangley C Mickey, Margaret L Palmsten, Christopher G Smith, Kathryn E L Smith, Sara L Zeigler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A scientific expert elicitation was conducted to address the feasibility of restoring coastal environments in response to future hazards to best meet management objectives. Subject matter experts produced probabilistic estimates of coastal change metrics used to evaluate decision objectives and alternatives informed by a stakeholder advisory group. Changes in salt marsh extents, storm surge flooding and barrier island morphology by the year 2050 were estimated for three scenarios of management actions (no action, interior headland restoration, beach and dune nourishment), while also considering the effects of future sea level rise (SLR). Collectively the participants were confident in their expectations of increased storm surge flooding with SLR, regardless of management interventions. Estimates of marsh response had large uncertainty, but experts generally hypothesized that marsh area would decrease with increasing SLR if no action was taken, especially in areas already experiencing marsh deterioration. There was agreement that dune heights and barrier island widths would decrease with SLR if no action was taken. Experts felt that beach and dune nourishment may reduce the amount of erosion under future SLR. All experts recognized the dynamic effects of SLR and feedback between bio-geo-physical processes that govern coastal systems. Participants agreed that size and location of management actions were important factors for influencing the coastal response. Expert elicitation is novel in the context of coastal management decision making and can be a useful tool for informing future scientific needs and providing rapid results to end users to inform reallocation of resources surrounding research and application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"394 \",\"pages\":\"127447\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127447\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

进行了一次科学专家讨论会,讨论恢复沿海环境以应对未来危害的可行性,以便最好地实现管理目标。主题专家制作了沿海变化指标的概率估计,用于评估利益相关者咨询小组告知的决策目标和备选方案。在考虑未来海平面上升(SLR)影响的情况下,通过三种管理行动(不采取行动、内陆海岬恢复、海滩和沙丘滋养),估计了到2050年盐沼范围、风暴潮洪水和堰洲岛形态的变化。总体而言,参与者对SLR增加风暴潮洪水的预期充满信心,无论管理干预措施如何。对沼泽反应的估计有很大的不确定性,但专家们普遍假设,如果不采取行动,沼泽面积将随着SLR的增加而减少,特别是在已经经历沼泽退化的地区。人们一致认为,如果不采取行动,沙丘高度和堰洲岛宽度将随着单反而减少。专家认为,在未来的单反下,海滩和沙丘的营养可能会减少侵蚀量。所有专家都认识到SLR的动态效应和控制海岸系统的生物-地球-物理过程之间的反馈。与会者一致认为,管理行动的规模和地点是影响沿海反应的重要因素。专家启发在沿海管理决策方面是新颖的,可以成为通知未来科学需求和向最终用户提供快速结果的有用工具,以便为围绕研究和应用的资源重新分配提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An expert elicitation to inform coastal management decision-making for mitigating future hazards.

A scientific expert elicitation was conducted to address the feasibility of restoring coastal environments in response to future hazards to best meet management objectives. Subject matter experts produced probabilistic estimates of coastal change metrics used to evaluate decision objectives and alternatives informed by a stakeholder advisory group. Changes in salt marsh extents, storm surge flooding and barrier island morphology by the year 2050 were estimated for three scenarios of management actions (no action, interior headland restoration, beach and dune nourishment), while also considering the effects of future sea level rise (SLR). Collectively the participants were confident in their expectations of increased storm surge flooding with SLR, regardless of management interventions. Estimates of marsh response had large uncertainty, but experts generally hypothesized that marsh area would decrease with increasing SLR if no action was taken, especially in areas already experiencing marsh deterioration. There was agreement that dune heights and barrier island widths would decrease with SLR if no action was taken. Experts felt that beach and dune nourishment may reduce the amount of erosion under future SLR. All experts recognized the dynamic effects of SLR and feedback between bio-geo-physical processes that govern coastal systems. Participants agreed that size and location of management actions were important factors for influencing the coastal response. Expert elicitation is novel in the context of coastal management decision making and can be a useful tool for informing future scientific needs and providing rapid results to end users to inform reallocation of resources surrounding research and application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信