{"title":"基于主观影像学和临床资料的胰腺导管腺癌隐匿性肝转移预测模型的建立和验证。","authors":"Jia-Bei Liu, Qian-Biao Gu, Jia He, Die-Juan Liu, Jia-Lu Long, Hao Li, Peng Liu","doi":"10.1002/cam4.71280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is highly lethal, with liver metastases leading to poorer outcomes. Occult liver metastases (OLM), undetected by initial imaging, complicate treatment and diminish survival rates. We aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for occult liver metastasis in pancreatic cancer, which is crucial for effective preoperative planning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 142 patients with PDAC were retrospectively analyzed between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2023. Malignant cases were confirmed by pathology, and benign cases were confirmed by pathology or follow-up. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. Factors associated with OLM in PDAC were identified using a stepwise approach, beginning with univariate and followed by multivariate logistic regression analyses. Logistic regression was used to develop clinical, radiological, and combined models, with performance evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). A nomogram was constructed, and calibration and decision curves were generated. Additionally, machine learning models (RF, SVM, XGBoost) were employed, with AUC and variable importance plots used to evaluate their performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Two clinical and four radiological features independently predicted OLM. The combined model achieved an AUC of 0.86 (training) and 0.84 (validation), outperforming clinical (AUC: 0.73, 0.75) and radiological models (AUC: 0.81, 0.75). Machine learning models showed AUCs of 0.787 (RF), 0.850 (SVM), and 0.851 (XGBoost) in the validation cohort. Decision and calibration curves confirmed the combined model's reliability and clinical utility.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The combined model incorporating clinical and radiological features offers a simple, cost-effective tool to identify PDAC patients at high risk for OLMs, supporting informed surgical decisions and improved outcomes. Integrating clinical and radiological markers enhances early detection and personalized care in PDAC management.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Occult Liver Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using Subjective Imaging and Clinical Data\",\"authors\":\"Jia-Bei Liu, Qian-Biao Gu, Jia He, Die-Juan Liu, Jia-Lu Long, Hao Li, Peng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.71280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is highly lethal, with liver metastases leading to poorer outcomes. Occult liver metastases (OLM), undetected by initial imaging, complicate treatment and diminish survival rates. We aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for occult liver metastasis in pancreatic cancer, which is crucial for effective preoperative planning.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 142 patients with PDAC were retrospectively analyzed between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2023. Malignant cases were confirmed by pathology, and benign cases were confirmed by pathology or follow-up. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. Factors associated with OLM in PDAC were identified using a stepwise approach, beginning with univariate and followed by multivariate logistic regression analyses. Logistic regression was used to develop clinical, radiological, and combined models, with performance evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). A nomogram was constructed, and calibration and decision curves were generated. Additionally, machine learning models (RF, SVM, XGBoost) were employed, with AUC and variable importance plots used to evaluate their performance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Two clinical and four radiological features independently predicted OLM. The combined model achieved an AUC of 0.86 (training) and 0.84 (validation), outperforming clinical (AUC: 0.73, 0.75) and radiological models (AUC: 0.81, 0.75). Machine learning models showed AUCs of 0.787 (RF), 0.850 (SVM), and 0.851 (XGBoost) in the validation cohort. Decision and calibration curves confirmed the combined model's reliability and clinical utility.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The combined model incorporating clinical and radiological features offers a simple, cost-effective tool to identify PDAC patients at high risk for OLMs, supporting informed surgical decisions and improved outcomes. Integrating clinical and radiological markers enhances early detection and personalized care in PDAC management.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477432/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71280\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71280","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Occult Liver Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using Subjective Imaging and Clinical Data
Background
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is highly lethal, with liver metastases leading to poorer outcomes. Occult liver metastases (OLM), undetected by initial imaging, complicate treatment and diminish survival rates. We aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for occult liver metastasis in pancreatic cancer, which is crucial for effective preoperative planning.
Methods
A total of 142 patients with PDAC were retrospectively analyzed between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2023. Malignant cases were confirmed by pathology, and benign cases were confirmed by pathology or follow-up. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. Factors associated with OLM in PDAC were identified using a stepwise approach, beginning with univariate and followed by multivariate logistic regression analyses. Logistic regression was used to develop clinical, radiological, and combined models, with performance evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). A nomogram was constructed, and calibration and decision curves were generated. Additionally, machine learning models (RF, SVM, XGBoost) were employed, with AUC and variable importance plots used to evaluate their performance.
Results
Two clinical and four radiological features independently predicted OLM. The combined model achieved an AUC of 0.86 (training) and 0.84 (validation), outperforming clinical (AUC: 0.73, 0.75) and radiological models (AUC: 0.81, 0.75). Machine learning models showed AUCs of 0.787 (RF), 0.850 (SVM), and 0.851 (XGBoost) in the validation cohort. Decision and calibration curves confirmed the combined model's reliability and clinical utility.
Conclusion
The combined model incorporating clinical and radiological features offers a simple, cost-effective tool to identify PDAC patients at high risk for OLMs, supporting informed surgical decisions and improved outcomes. Integrating clinical and radiological markers enhances early detection and personalized care in PDAC management.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas:
Clinical Cancer Research
Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations
Cancer Biology:
Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery.
Cancer Prevention:
Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach.
Bioinformatics:
Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers.
Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.