极限分析框架下不排水基坑底鼓稳定性分析:确定性和概率方法

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Tingting Zhang, Xiangfeng Guo, Julien Baroth, Daniel Dias
{"title":"极限分析框架下不排水基坑底鼓稳定性分析:确定性和概率方法","authors":"Tingting Zhang,&nbsp;Xiangfeng Guo,&nbsp;Julien Baroth,&nbsp;Daniel Dias","doi":"10.1007/s11440-025-02674-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study introduces a new and efficient methodology for the stability analysis of excavations, accounting for soil variability, by integrating an improved limit analysis (iLA) method with the Polynomial Chaos Kriging (PCK) and Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) technique. First, the iLA method is proposed for deterministic analysis, incorporating factors such as the soil–wall interface, excavation geometry, and wall embedment depth. This approach allows for the estimation of the basal heave safety factor using the strength reduction method in combination with a bisection optimization technique. The accuracy and versatility of the proposed iLA method are demonstrated through comparisons with numerical simulations and four existing analytical methods. Next, the study introduces an active learning method, PCK–MCS, and integrates it with the iLA method to perform probabilistic analyses of excavation stability. The efficiency and effectiveness of the final integrated methodology, iLA–PCK–MCS, are validated through comparisons with established methods, including direct MCS, Subset Simulation, and Kriging- and Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansion-based MCS. Finally, leveraging the computational efficiency of the iLA–PCK–MCS framework, a parametric study is conducted to provide insights into the effects of soil uncertainties, the soil–wall interface, and wall embedment depth on excavation stability. The methods presented in this study are expected to advance both deterministic and probabilistic analyses in excavation projects by offering a highly efficient and accurate tool for evaluating basal heave stability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 10","pages":"5007 - 5026"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basal heave stability analysis of undrained excavations in a limit analysis framework: deterministic and probabilistic approaches\",\"authors\":\"Tingting Zhang,&nbsp;Xiangfeng Guo,&nbsp;Julien Baroth,&nbsp;Daniel Dias\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11440-025-02674-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study introduces a new and efficient methodology for the stability analysis of excavations, accounting for soil variability, by integrating an improved limit analysis (iLA) method with the Polynomial Chaos Kriging (PCK) and Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) technique. First, the iLA method is proposed for deterministic analysis, incorporating factors such as the soil–wall interface, excavation geometry, and wall embedment depth. This approach allows for the estimation of the basal heave safety factor using the strength reduction method in combination with a bisection optimization technique. The accuracy and versatility of the proposed iLA method are demonstrated through comparisons with numerical simulations and four existing analytical methods. Next, the study introduces an active learning method, PCK–MCS, and integrates it with the iLA method to perform probabilistic analyses of excavation stability. The efficiency and effectiveness of the final integrated methodology, iLA–PCK–MCS, are validated through comparisons with established methods, including direct MCS, Subset Simulation, and Kriging- and Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansion-based MCS. Finally, leveraging the computational efficiency of the iLA–PCK–MCS framework, a parametric study is conducted to provide insights into the effects of soil uncertainties, the soil–wall interface, and wall embedment depth on excavation stability. The methods presented in this study are expected to advance both deterministic and probabilistic analyses in excavation projects by offering a highly efficient and accurate tool for evaluating basal heave stability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"volume\":\"20 10\",\"pages\":\"5007 - 5026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02674-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02674-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究将改进的极限分析(iLA)方法与多项式混沌克里格(PCK)和蒙特卡罗模拟(MCS)技术相结合,引入了一种新的有效方法,用于考虑土壤变异性的基坑稳定性分析。首先,提出了结合土-墙界面、开挖几何形状和墙埋深等因素的确定性分析iLA方法。这种方法允许使用强度折减法结合二分优化技术来估计基本的升沉安全系数。通过与数值模拟和四种现有分析方法的比较,证明了该方法的准确性和通用性。其次,引入主动学习方法PCK-MCS,并将其与iLA方法相结合,对基坑稳定性进行概率分析。通过与现有方法(包括直接MCS、子集仿真以及基于Kriging和稀疏多项式混沌展开的MCS)的比较,验证了最终集成方法iLA-PCK-MCS的效率和有效性。最后,利用iLA-PCK-MCS框架的计算效率,进行了参数化研究,以深入了解土壤不确定性、土-墙界面和墙埋深对开挖稳定性的影响。本研究提出的方法有望通过提供一种高效、准确的评估地基隆起稳定性的工具,推进基坑工程的确定性和概率分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Basal heave stability analysis of undrained excavations in a limit analysis framework: deterministic and probabilistic approaches

Basal heave stability analysis of undrained excavations in a limit analysis framework: deterministic and probabilistic approaches

This study introduces a new and efficient methodology for the stability analysis of excavations, accounting for soil variability, by integrating an improved limit analysis (iLA) method with the Polynomial Chaos Kriging (PCK) and Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) technique. First, the iLA method is proposed for deterministic analysis, incorporating factors such as the soil–wall interface, excavation geometry, and wall embedment depth. This approach allows for the estimation of the basal heave safety factor using the strength reduction method in combination with a bisection optimization technique. The accuracy and versatility of the proposed iLA method are demonstrated through comparisons with numerical simulations and four existing analytical methods. Next, the study introduces an active learning method, PCK–MCS, and integrates it with the iLA method to perform probabilistic analyses of excavation stability. The efficiency and effectiveness of the final integrated methodology, iLA–PCK–MCS, are validated through comparisons with established methods, including direct MCS, Subset Simulation, and Kriging- and Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansion-based MCS. Finally, leveraging the computational efficiency of the iLA–PCK–MCS framework, a parametric study is conducted to provide insights into the effects of soil uncertainties, the soil–wall interface, and wall embedment depth on excavation stability. The methods presented in this study are expected to advance both deterministic and probabilistic analyses in excavation projects by offering a highly efficient and accurate tool for evaluating basal heave stability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Geotechnica
Acta Geotechnica ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
17.50%
发文量
297
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信