Tingting Zhang, Xiangfeng Guo, Julien Baroth, Daniel Dias
{"title":"极限分析框架下不排水基坑底鼓稳定性分析:确定性和概率方法","authors":"Tingting Zhang, Xiangfeng Guo, Julien Baroth, Daniel Dias","doi":"10.1007/s11440-025-02674-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study introduces a new and efficient methodology for the stability analysis of excavations, accounting for soil variability, by integrating an improved limit analysis (iLA) method with the Polynomial Chaos Kriging (PCK) and Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) technique. First, the iLA method is proposed for deterministic analysis, incorporating factors such as the soil–wall interface, excavation geometry, and wall embedment depth. This approach allows for the estimation of the basal heave safety factor using the strength reduction method in combination with a bisection optimization technique. The accuracy and versatility of the proposed iLA method are demonstrated through comparisons with numerical simulations and four existing analytical methods. Next, the study introduces an active learning method, PCK–MCS, and integrates it with the iLA method to perform probabilistic analyses of excavation stability. The efficiency and effectiveness of the final integrated methodology, iLA–PCK–MCS, are validated through comparisons with established methods, including direct MCS, Subset Simulation, and Kriging- and Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansion-based MCS. Finally, leveraging the computational efficiency of the iLA–PCK–MCS framework, a parametric study is conducted to provide insights into the effects of soil uncertainties, the soil–wall interface, and wall embedment depth on excavation stability. The methods presented in this study are expected to advance both deterministic and probabilistic analyses in excavation projects by offering a highly efficient and accurate tool for evaluating basal heave stability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 10","pages":"5007 - 5026"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basal heave stability analysis of undrained excavations in a limit analysis framework: deterministic and probabilistic approaches\",\"authors\":\"Tingting Zhang, Xiangfeng Guo, Julien Baroth, Daniel Dias\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11440-025-02674-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study introduces a new and efficient methodology for the stability analysis of excavations, accounting for soil variability, by integrating an improved limit analysis (iLA) method with the Polynomial Chaos Kriging (PCK) and Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) technique. First, the iLA method is proposed for deterministic analysis, incorporating factors such as the soil–wall interface, excavation geometry, and wall embedment depth. This approach allows for the estimation of the basal heave safety factor using the strength reduction method in combination with a bisection optimization technique. The accuracy and versatility of the proposed iLA method are demonstrated through comparisons with numerical simulations and four existing analytical methods. Next, the study introduces an active learning method, PCK–MCS, and integrates it with the iLA method to perform probabilistic analyses of excavation stability. The efficiency and effectiveness of the final integrated methodology, iLA–PCK–MCS, are validated through comparisons with established methods, including direct MCS, Subset Simulation, and Kriging- and Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansion-based MCS. Finally, leveraging the computational efficiency of the iLA–PCK–MCS framework, a parametric study is conducted to provide insights into the effects of soil uncertainties, the soil–wall interface, and wall embedment depth on excavation stability. The methods presented in this study are expected to advance both deterministic and probabilistic analyses in excavation projects by offering a highly efficient and accurate tool for evaluating basal heave stability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"volume\":\"20 10\",\"pages\":\"5007 - 5026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02674-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02674-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Basal heave stability analysis of undrained excavations in a limit analysis framework: deterministic and probabilistic approaches
This study introduces a new and efficient methodology for the stability analysis of excavations, accounting for soil variability, by integrating an improved limit analysis (iLA) method with the Polynomial Chaos Kriging (PCK) and Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) technique. First, the iLA method is proposed for deterministic analysis, incorporating factors such as the soil–wall interface, excavation geometry, and wall embedment depth. This approach allows for the estimation of the basal heave safety factor using the strength reduction method in combination with a bisection optimization technique. The accuracy and versatility of the proposed iLA method are demonstrated through comparisons with numerical simulations and four existing analytical methods. Next, the study introduces an active learning method, PCK–MCS, and integrates it with the iLA method to perform probabilistic analyses of excavation stability. The efficiency and effectiveness of the final integrated methodology, iLA–PCK–MCS, are validated through comparisons with established methods, including direct MCS, Subset Simulation, and Kriging- and Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansion-based MCS. Finally, leveraging the computational efficiency of the iLA–PCK–MCS framework, a parametric study is conducted to provide insights into the effects of soil uncertainties, the soil–wall interface, and wall embedment depth on excavation stability. The methods presented in this study are expected to advance both deterministic and probabilistic analyses in excavation projects by offering a highly efficient and accurate tool for evaluating basal heave stability.
期刊介绍:
Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.