{"title":"在层状土介质中使用双重开放和土工泡沫填充屏障的动态压实诱发的地面振动筛分:物理现场实验和数值模拟","authors":"Nitish Jauhari, Amarnath Hegde, Pradipta Chakrabortty","doi":"10.1007/s11440-025-02661-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dynamic compaction activities induce high-energy wave packets into the soil medium that cause public nuisances, necessitating the adoption of vibration mitigation measures. Most experimental studies have focused on the usage of single-wave barriers that demand nonviable depths. The current study employs a combination of field tests and numerical simulations to analyse the isolation potential of dual open and geofoam-infilled barriers in the mitigation of impact-induced ground vibrations. The experimental procedure consists of dropping a mass using a mechanical loading device. The amplitudes of vertical velocities were recorded before and after the installation of barrier systems. Furthermore, a numerical model simulating plane-strain behaviour was developed using PLAXIS 2D and verified through a direct comparison with experimental results. A detailed parametric investigation was then conducted to examine the influence of different contributing parameters in mitigating dynamic compaction-induced ground vibrations. Furthermore, the effectiveness of geofoam was compared with other infill materials, viz. bentonite, ceramsite, concrete and sand–rubber mixture. Strong evidence was observed for the implementation of dual barriers in preference to single barriers. The optimum depth of 0.5<i>L</i><sub>R</sub> and 0.7<i>L</i><sub>R</sub> (where <span>\\({L}_{\\text{R}}\\)</span> is Rayleigh wavelength) was observed for dual open and geofoam-infilled barriers to screen 75% of vertical vibrations. An average amplitude reduction ratio of 0.24 and 0.27 was noted for the EPS15 (expanded polystyrene geofoam with a density of 15 kg/m<sup>3</sup>) and ceramsite-filled dual barriers for a depth of 0.7<i>L</i><sub>R</sub>. Furthermore, the isolation efficiency of EPS48 was noted to decline by 61% compared to EPS15 geofoam.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 10","pages":"5349 - 5379"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic compaction-induced ground vibration screening using dual open and geofoam-infilled barriers in layered soil media: physical field experiments and numerical simulations\",\"authors\":\"Nitish Jauhari, Amarnath Hegde, Pradipta Chakrabortty\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11440-025-02661-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Dynamic compaction activities induce high-energy wave packets into the soil medium that cause public nuisances, necessitating the adoption of vibration mitigation measures. Most experimental studies have focused on the usage of single-wave barriers that demand nonviable depths. The current study employs a combination of field tests and numerical simulations to analyse the isolation potential of dual open and geofoam-infilled barriers in the mitigation of impact-induced ground vibrations. The experimental procedure consists of dropping a mass using a mechanical loading device. The amplitudes of vertical velocities were recorded before and after the installation of barrier systems. Furthermore, a numerical model simulating plane-strain behaviour was developed using PLAXIS 2D and verified through a direct comparison with experimental results. A detailed parametric investigation was then conducted to examine the influence of different contributing parameters in mitigating dynamic compaction-induced ground vibrations. Furthermore, the effectiveness of geofoam was compared with other infill materials, viz. bentonite, ceramsite, concrete and sand–rubber mixture. Strong evidence was observed for the implementation of dual barriers in preference to single barriers. The optimum depth of 0.5<i>L</i><sub>R</sub> and 0.7<i>L</i><sub>R</sub> (where <span>\\\\({L}_{\\\\text{R}}\\\\)</span> is Rayleigh wavelength) was observed for dual open and geofoam-infilled barriers to screen 75% of vertical vibrations. An average amplitude reduction ratio of 0.24 and 0.27 was noted for the EPS15 (expanded polystyrene geofoam with a density of 15 kg/m<sup>3</sup>) and ceramsite-filled dual barriers for a depth of 0.7<i>L</i><sub>R</sub>. Furthermore, the isolation efficiency of EPS48 was noted to decline by 61% compared to EPS15 geofoam.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"volume\":\"20 10\",\"pages\":\"5349 - 5379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02661-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02661-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
强夯活动诱导高能波包进入土壤介质,对公众造成滋扰,需要采取减振措施。大多数实验研究都集中在要求不可行的深度的单波屏障的使用上。目前的研究采用现场试验和数值模拟相结合的方法,分析了双重开放和土工泡沫填充屏障在减轻冲击引起的地面振动方面的隔离潜力。实验过程包括使用机械加载装置落下一个物体。在安装屏障系统之前和之后记录了垂直速度的振幅。此外,利用PLAXIS 2D建立了模拟平面应变行为的数值模型,并与实验结果进行了直接比较。然后进行了详细的参数调查,以检查不同的贡献参数对减轻动态压实引起的地面振动的影响。并与膨润土、陶粒、混凝土、砂胶混合料等填充材料进行了对比。强有力的证据表明,实施双重壁垒优于单一壁垒。对于双开屏障和土工泡沫填充屏障,观察到屏蔽75的最佳深度为0.5LR和0.7LR (\({L}_{\text{R}}\)为瑞利波长)% of vertical vibrations. An average amplitude reduction ratio of 0.24 and 0.27 was noted for the EPS15 (expanded polystyrene geofoam with a density of 15 kg/m3) and ceramsite-filled dual barriers for a depth of 0.7LR. Furthermore, the isolation efficiency of EPS48 was noted to decline by 61% compared to EPS15 geofoam.
Dynamic compaction-induced ground vibration screening using dual open and geofoam-infilled barriers in layered soil media: physical field experiments and numerical simulations
Dynamic compaction activities induce high-energy wave packets into the soil medium that cause public nuisances, necessitating the adoption of vibration mitigation measures. Most experimental studies have focused on the usage of single-wave barriers that demand nonviable depths. The current study employs a combination of field tests and numerical simulations to analyse the isolation potential of dual open and geofoam-infilled barriers in the mitigation of impact-induced ground vibrations. The experimental procedure consists of dropping a mass using a mechanical loading device. The amplitudes of vertical velocities were recorded before and after the installation of barrier systems. Furthermore, a numerical model simulating plane-strain behaviour was developed using PLAXIS 2D and verified through a direct comparison with experimental results. A detailed parametric investigation was then conducted to examine the influence of different contributing parameters in mitigating dynamic compaction-induced ground vibrations. Furthermore, the effectiveness of geofoam was compared with other infill materials, viz. bentonite, ceramsite, concrete and sand–rubber mixture. Strong evidence was observed for the implementation of dual barriers in preference to single barriers. The optimum depth of 0.5LR and 0.7LR (where \({L}_{\text{R}}\) is Rayleigh wavelength) was observed for dual open and geofoam-infilled barriers to screen 75% of vertical vibrations. An average amplitude reduction ratio of 0.24 and 0.27 was noted for the EPS15 (expanded polystyrene geofoam with a density of 15 kg/m3) and ceramsite-filled dual barriers for a depth of 0.7LR. Furthermore, the isolation efficiency of EPS48 was noted to decline by 61% compared to EPS15 geofoam.
期刊介绍:
Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.