Qiaoyan Chen , Siyuan Cheng , Shuting Yu , Xiaowei Guo , Zhongyi Sun , Zhongmin Hu , Licong Dai
{"title":"热带森林的森林恢复恢复了表层土壤的保水能力,但没有改善深层土壤","authors":"Qiaoyan Chen , Siyuan Cheng , Shuting Yu , Xiaowei Guo , Zhongyi Sun , Zhongmin Hu , Licong Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.iswcr.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tropical primary forests have been rapidly reduced in recent decade owing to slash-and-burn, leading to the formation of tropical secondary forests in different recovery stages. However, it is still unclear whether the soil water retention capacity in secondary forests can recover to the level of soil water retention in old-growth forest. In this study, three recovery stages of tropical secondary forests (i.e. early recovery stage, middle recovery stage, late recovery stage), and old-growth forest were selected for comparison in tropical forests on Hainan Island. By using spatiotemporal substitution method, we investigated the variation of soil water retention in three recovery stages and old-growth forest, and revealed its dominant controlling factors. The results showed that 0–60 cm soil water retention was improved as recovery stage progresses. Specifically, the topsoil (0–10 cm) soil water retention in later stage almost could recover the level of old-growth forest, whereas the deep soil (10–60 cm) water retention may not recover the level of old-growth forest as recovery stage progresses. Additionally, the soil structure and soil nutrients also improve while the soil aggregates stability reduced as recovery stage progresses. Among these properties, total porosity was found to be the most important factor controlling soil water retention, accounting for 27.44 %, followed by bulk density (19.62 %) and capillary porosity (16.83 %), but soil particle size composition had a weakly effect on soil water retention. Overall, our results suggested that forest restoration is effective measures improve topsoil water retention capacity, but the deep soil water retention capacity may need more years to recovery. These findings have implications for the management and retention of primary forests and the restoration of secondary forests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48622,"journal":{"name":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","volume":"13 4","pages":"Pages 922-932"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forest restoration in tropical forests recovers topsoil water retention but does not improve deep soil layers\",\"authors\":\"Qiaoyan Chen , Siyuan Cheng , Shuting Yu , Xiaowei Guo , Zhongyi Sun , Zhongmin Hu , Licong Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iswcr.2025.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Tropical primary forests have been rapidly reduced in recent decade owing to slash-and-burn, leading to the formation of tropical secondary forests in different recovery stages. However, it is still unclear whether the soil water retention capacity in secondary forests can recover to the level of soil water retention in old-growth forest. In this study, three recovery stages of tropical secondary forests (i.e. early recovery stage, middle recovery stage, late recovery stage), and old-growth forest were selected for comparison in tropical forests on Hainan Island. By using spatiotemporal substitution method, we investigated the variation of soil water retention in three recovery stages and old-growth forest, and revealed its dominant controlling factors. The results showed that 0–60 cm soil water retention was improved as recovery stage progresses. Specifically, the topsoil (0–10 cm) soil water retention in later stage almost could recover the level of old-growth forest, whereas the deep soil (10–60 cm) water retention may not recover the level of old-growth forest as recovery stage progresses. Additionally, the soil structure and soil nutrients also improve while the soil aggregates stability reduced as recovery stage progresses. Among these properties, total porosity was found to be the most important factor controlling soil water retention, accounting for 27.44 %, followed by bulk density (19.62 %) and capillary porosity (16.83 %), but soil particle size composition had a weakly effect on soil water retention. Overall, our results suggested that forest restoration is effective measures improve topsoil water retention capacity, but the deep soil water retention capacity may need more years to recovery. These findings have implications for the management and retention of primary forests and the restoration of secondary forests.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Soil and Water Conservation Research\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 922-932\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Soil and Water Conservation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633925000425\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633925000425","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Forest restoration in tropical forests recovers topsoil water retention but does not improve deep soil layers
Tropical primary forests have been rapidly reduced in recent decade owing to slash-and-burn, leading to the formation of tropical secondary forests in different recovery stages. However, it is still unclear whether the soil water retention capacity in secondary forests can recover to the level of soil water retention in old-growth forest. In this study, three recovery stages of tropical secondary forests (i.e. early recovery stage, middle recovery stage, late recovery stage), and old-growth forest were selected for comparison in tropical forests on Hainan Island. By using spatiotemporal substitution method, we investigated the variation of soil water retention in three recovery stages and old-growth forest, and revealed its dominant controlling factors. The results showed that 0–60 cm soil water retention was improved as recovery stage progresses. Specifically, the topsoil (0–10 cm) soil water retention in later stage almost could recover the level of old-growth forest, whereas the deep soil (10–60 cm) water retention may not recover the level of old-growth forest as recovery stage progresses. Additionally, the soil structure and soil nutrients also improve while the soil aggregates stability reduced as recovery stage progresses. Among these properties, total porosity was found to be the most important factor controlling soil water retention, accounting for 27.44 %, followed by bulk density (19.62 %) and capillary porosity (16.83 %), but soil particle size composition had a weakly effect on soil water retention. Overall, our results suggested that forest restoration is effective measures improve topsoil water retention capacity, but the deep soil water retention capacity may need more years to recovery. These findings have implications for the management and retention of primary forests and the restoration of secondary forests.
期刊介绍:
The International Soil and Water Conservation Research (ISWCR), the official journal of World Association of Soil and Water Conservation (WASWAC) http://www.waswac.org, is a multidisciplinary journal of soil and water conservation research, practice, policy, and perspectives. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and promote the practice of soil and water conservation.
The scope of International Soil and Water Conservation Research includes research, strategies, and technologies for prediction, prevention, and protection of soil and water resources. It deals with identification, characterization, and modeling; dynamic monitoring and evaluation; assessment and management of conservation practice and creation and implementation of quality standards.
Examples of appropriate topical areas include (but are not limited to):
• Conservation models, tools, and technologies
• Conservation agricultural
• Soil health resources, indicators, assessment, and management
• Land degradation
• Sustainable development
• Soil erosion and its control
• Soil erosion processes
• Water resources assessment and management
• Watershed management
• Soil erosion models
• Literature review on topics related soil and water conservation research