{"title":"Naïve东亚视角下的辩证主义与关系观的兴盛。","authors":"Minjoo Joo,Ben C P Lam","doi":"10.1177/10888683251349384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic AbstractThis paper challenges Western-centric models of relationship quality that deem satisfaction, steadiness in aspects of relationships (i.e., stability), and romantic dyads as ideal by incorporating naïve dialecticism rooted in East Asian philosophies. Naïve dialecticism encompasses the tolerance of contradictions, the anticipation of change, and holism. By examining how these principles manifest in relationship processes and functioning that diverge from Western models, we offer a new framework for conceptualizing relationship flourishing. Specifically, we propose that accepting contradictions, embracing change, and recognizing relationships as embedded within broader sociocultural and institutional contexts could facilitate a more inclusive understanding of what constitutes a \"good\" relationship. Our paper highlights the value of incorporating cultural theories into relationship science, provides actionable suggestions for researchers, and outlines how this perspective can inform emerging areas of research such as intercultural relationships and singlehood.Public AbstractThis paper redefines what makes a romantic relationship \"good\" by integrating East Asian philosophies, which value contradictions, embrace change, and emphasize interconnectedness. While many Western ideals of close relationships focus mainly on satisfaction, steadiness in aspects of relationships (i.e., stability), and one-on-one relationship with the romantic partner, we suggest that embracing goods and bads, ups and downs, and recognizing relationships as embedded within broader sociocultural and institutional contexts could facilitate a more inclusive understanding of what constitutes a \"good relationship.\" By adopting these insights, we can better understand and support the relationship well-being of various groups, especially those more prone to the influence of East Asian culture. This approach not only promotes a culturally sensitive understanding of relationship functioning but also provides insights for navigating new forms of relationships, such as intercultural relationships and singlehood.","PeriodicalId":48386,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","volume":"96 1","pages":"383-395"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Naïve Dialecticism and Conceptions of Relationship Flourishing From an East Asian Perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Minjoo Joo,Ben C P Lam\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10888683251349384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Academic AbstractThis paper challenges Western-centric models of relationship quality that deem satisfaction, steadiness in aspects of relationships (i.e., stability), and romantic dyads as ideal by incorporating naïve dialecticism rooted in East Asian philosophies. Naïve dialecticism encompasses the tolerance of contradictions, the anticipation of change, and holism. By examining how these principles manifest in relationship processes and functioning that diverge from Western models, we offer a new framework for conceptualizing relationship flourishing. Specifically, we propose that accepting contradictions, embracing change, and recognizing relationships as embedded within broader sociocultural and institutional contexts could facilitate a more inclusive understanding of what constitutes a \\\"good\\\" relationship. Our paper highlights the value of incorporating cultural theories into relationship science, provides actionable suggestions for researchers, and outlines how this perspective can inform emerging areas of research such as intercultural relationships and singlehood.Public AbstractThis paper redefines what makes a romantic relationship \\\"good\\\" by integrating East Asian philosophies, which value contradictions, embrace change, and emphasize interconnectedness. While many Western ideals of close relationships focus mainly on satisfaction, steadiness in aspects of relationships (i.e., stability), and one-on-one relationship with the romantic partner, we suggest that embracing goods and bads, ups and downs, and recognizing relationships as embedded within broader sociocultural and institutional contexts could facilitate a more inclusive understanding of what constitutes a \\\"good relationship.\\\" By adopting these insights, we can better understand and support the relationship well-being of various groups, especially those more prone to the influence of East Asian culture. This approach not only promotes a culturally sensitive understanding of relationship functioning but also provides insights for navigating new forms of relationships, such as intercultural relationships and singlehood.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Social Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"383-395\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Social Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683251349384\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683251349384","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Naïve Dialecticism and Conceptions of Relationship Flourishing From an East Asian Perspective.
Academic AbstractThis paper challenges Western-centric models of relationship quality that deem satisfaction, steadiness in aspects of relationships (i.e., stability), and romantic dyads as ideal by incorporating naïve dialecticism rooted in East Asian philosophies. Naïve dialecticism encompasses the tolerance of contradictions, the anticipation of change, and holism. By examining how these principles manifest in relationship processes and functioning that diverge from Western models, we offer a new framework for conceptualizing relationship flourishing. Specifically, we propose that accepting contradictions, embracing change, and recognizing relationships as embedded within broader sociocultural and institutional contexts could facilitate a more inclusive understanding of what constitutes a "good" relationship. Our paper highlights the value of incorporating cultural theories into relationship science, provides actionable suggestions for researchers, and outlines how this perspective can inform emerging areas of research such as intercultural relationships and singlehood.Public AbstractThis paper redefines what makes a romantic relationship "good" by integrating East Asian philosophies, which value contradictions, embrace change, and emphasize interconnectedness. While many Western ideals of close relationships focus mainly on satisfaction, steadiness in aspects of relationships (i.e., stability), and one-on-one relationship with the romantic partner, we suggest that embracing goods and bads, ups and downs, and recognizing relationships as embedded within broader sociocultural and institutional contexts could facilitate a more inclusive understanding of what constitutes a "good relationship." By adopting these insights, we can better understand and support the relationship well-being of various groups, especially those more prone to the influence of East Asian culture. This approach not only promotes a culturally sensitive understanding of relationship functioning but also provides insights for navigating new forms of relationships, such as intercultural relationships and singlehood.
期刊介绍:
Title: Personality and Social Psychology Review (PSPR)
Journal Overview:
Official journal of SPSP, the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
Premiere outlet for original theoretical papers and conceptual review articles in all areas of personality and social psychology
Features stimulating conceptual pieces identifying new research directions and comprehensive review papers providing integrative frameworks for existing theory and research programs
Topics Covered:
Attitudes and Social Cognition: Examines the inner workings of the human mind in understanding, evaluating, and responding to the social environment
Interpersonal and Group Processes: Explores patterns of interaction and interdependence characterizing everyday human functioning
Intergroup Relations: Investigates determinants of prejudice, conflict, cooperation, and harmonious relationships between social groups
Personality and Individual Differences: Focuses on causes, assessment, structures, and processes giving rise to human variation
Biological and Cultural Influences: Studies the biological and cultural mediation of social psychological and personality processes