{"title":"用于全固态锂电池商业化的硫化物和卤化物电解质的比较进展。","authors":"Mohamed Djihad Bouguern,Ningaraju Gejjiganahalli Ningappa,Karthik Vishweswariah,Anil Kumar M R,Ryoji Kanno,Karim Zaghib","doi":"10.1002/adma.202513255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSBs) outperform lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in safety, energy density, and thermal stability. Their performance depends on high ionic conductivity, chemical/physical stability, and scalable manufacture of solid electrolytes (SEs). This study compares sulfide- and halide-based SEs, two promising next-generation energy storage options. Soft mechanics permit sulfides with high room-temperature conductivity, low activation energies, and processability, but high-voltage cathode instability, moisture sensitivity, and probable hydrogen sulfide (H2S) release. Market prospects are favorable as the industry improves crystallinity and elemental substitution, especially for automotive cells. Chloride-based halides are more environmentally friendly, have adequate voltage stability, and can be used with oxide cathodes without coatings. Despite traditionally low conductivity, high-entropy, and oxyhalide chemistries currently reach 10 mS cm-1, and scalable solvent syntheses and dry processing are driving adoption. Mechanical compliance and the use of rare elements (In, Sc) continue to cause integration and cost issues. Composition, microstructure, synthesis techniques, interfacial behavior, mechanical characteristics, and scalability are evaluated. The findings show sulfides have better conductivity and Li-metal compatibility, but halides are more stable and manufacturable, recommending hybrid or tailored material selection based on application. Optimizing ASSB systems requires complementary sulfide/chloride utilization due to halides' mechanical constraints.","PeriodicalId":114,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Materials","volume":"18 1","pages":"e13255"},"PeriodicalIF":26.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Advances in Sulfide and Halide Electrolytes for Commercialization of All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Djihad Bouguern,Ningaraju Gejjiganahalli Ningappa,Karthik Vishweswariah,Anil Kumar M R,Ryoji Kanno,Karim Zaghib\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/adma.202513255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"All-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSBs) outperform lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in safety, energy density, and thermal stability. Their performance depends on high ionic conductivity, chemical/physical stability, and scalable manufacture of solid electrolytes (SEs). This study compares sulfide- and halide-based SEs, two promising next-generation energy storage options. Soft mechanics permit sulfides with high room-temperature conductivity, low activation energies, and processability, but high-voltage cathode instability, moisture sensitivity, and probable hydrogen sulfide (H2S) release. Market prospects are favorable as the industry improves crystallinity and elemental substitution, especially for automotive cells. Chloride-based halides are more environmentally friendly, have adequate voltage stability, and can be used with oxide cathodes without coatings. Despite traditionally low conductivity, high-entropy, and oxyhalide chemistries currently reach 10 mS cm-1, and scalable solvent syntheses and dry processing are driving adoption. Mechanical compliance and the use of rare elements (In, Sc) continue to cause integration and cost issues. Composition, microstructure, synthesis techniques, interfacial behavior, mechanical characteristics, and scalability are evaluated. The findings show sulfides have better conductivity and Li-metal compatibility, but halides are more stable and manufacturable, recommending hybrid or tailored material selection based on application. Optimizing ASSB systems requires complementary sulfide/chloride utilization due to halides' mechanical constraints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Materials\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"e13255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":26.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202513255\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202513255","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
全固态锂电池(assb)在安全性、能量密度和热稳定性方面都优于锂离子电池(lib)。它们的性能取决于高离子电导率、化学/物理稳定性和固体电解质(SEs)的可扩展制造。这项研究比较了硫化物和卤化物两种有前途的下一代储能选择。软力学允许硫化物具有高室温导电性、低活化能和可加工性,但高压阴极不稳定性、湿气敏感性和可能的硫化氢(H2S)释放。市场前景良好,因为行业提高结晶度和元素替代,特别是在汽车电池。氯基卤化物更环保,具有足够的电压稳定性,并且可以与无涂层的氧化物阴极一起使用。尽管传统的低电导率、高熵和氧化卤化物化学目前达到10 mS cm-1,可扩展的溶剂合成和干法加工正在推动其采用。机械合规性和稀有元素(In, Sc)的使用继续导致集成和成本问题。评估了其组成、微观结构、合成技术、界面行为、机械特性和可扩展性。研究结果表明,硫化物具有更好的导电性和锂金属相容性,但卤化物更加稳定和可制造,建议根据应用选择混合或定制材料。由于卤化物的机械限制,优化ASSB系统需要互补的硫化物/氯化物利用。
Comparative Advances in Sulfide and Halide Electrolytes for Commercialization of All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries.
All-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSBs) outperform lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in safety, energy density, and thermal stability. Their performance depends on high ionic conductivity, chemical/physical stability, and scalable manufacture of solid electrolytes (SEs). This study compares sulfide- and halide-based SEs, two promising next-generation energy storage options. Soft mechanics permit sulfides with high room-temperature conductivity, low activation energies, and processability, but high-voltage cathode instability, moisture sensitivity, and probable hydrogen sulfide (H2S) release. Market prospects are favorable as the industry improves crystallinity and elemental substitution, especially for automotive cells. Chloride-based halides are more environmentally friendly, have adequate voltage stability, and can be used with oxide cathodes without coatings. Despite traditionally low conductivity, high-entropy, and oxyhalide chemistries currently reach 10 mS cm-1, and scalable solvent syntheses and dry processing are driving adoption. Mechanical compliance and the use of rare elements (In, Sc) continue to cause integration and cost issues. Composition, microstructure, synthesis techniques, interfacial behavior, mechanical characteristics, and scalability are evaluated. The findings show sulfides have better conductivity and Li-metal compatibility, but halides are more stable and manufacturable, recommending hybrid or tailored material selection based on application. Optimizing ASSB systems requires complementary sulfide/chloride utilization due to halides' mechanical constraints.
期刊介绍:
Advanced Materials, one of the world's most prestigious journals and the foundation of the Advanced portfolio, is the home of choice for best-in-class materials science for more than 30 years. Following this fast-growing and interdisciplinary field, we are considering and publishing the most important discoveries on any and all materials from materials scientists, chemists, physicists, engineers as well as health and life scientists and bringing you the latest results and trends in modern materials-related research every week.