一种新的双门静脉内窥镜经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术中的门静脉切换技术:技术要点和比较结果。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yun-Da Li, Chi-An Luo, Yung-Hsueh Hu, Wen-Chien Chen, Tsung-Ting Tsai, Po-Liang Lai, Tsai-Sheng Fu
{"title":"一种新的双门静脉内窥镜经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术中的门静脉切换技术:技术要点和比较结果。","authors":"Yun-Da Li, Chi-An Luo, Yung-Hsueh Hu, Wen-Chien Chen, Tsung-Ting Tsai, Po-Liang Lai, Tsai-Sheng Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of a fixed portal arrangement during biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (BE-TLIF) may result in suboptimal instrument trajectory angles, leading to inadequate endplate preparation or difficulties in cage implantation. Therefore, we propose the switching portal technique, which enables the operator to switch the viewing and instrument portals. The aim of this study is to describe our surgical technique and present comparative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 74 consecutive patients who underwent BE-TLIF at a total of 82 levels between January 2021 and July 2023 and were followed for at least 1 year after surgery. Patients were divided into two groups, the fixed portal group and the switching portal group, according to whether the switching portal technique was used for endplate preparation and insertion trajectory adjustment. Clinical and radiographical outcomes were analyzed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Endplate injuries were significantly more common in the fixed portal group than in the switching portal group. The modified McNab's criteria were not significantly different between the groups, but the switching portal group had a greater proportion of excellent and good outcomes (92.3%) than the fixed portal group did (82.9%). Cage subsidence occurred in 20.5% of patients in the fixed portal group and 4.7% in the switching portal group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The switching portal technique is safe and useful in BE-TLIF, as it enables effective disc preparation and ensures a precise trajectory for cage insertion, thereby significantly reducing the risks of endplate injury and cage subsidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"124511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Switching Portal Technique in Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Notes and Comparative Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Yun-Da Li, Chi-An Luo, Yung-Hsueh Hu, Wen-Chien Chen, Tsung-Ting Tsai, Po-Liang Lai, Tsai-Sheng Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of a fixed portal arrangement during biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (BE-TLIF) may result in suboptimal instrument trajectory angles, leading to inadequate endplate preparation or difficulties in cage implantation. Therefore, we propose the switching portal technique, which enables the operator to switch the viewing and instrument portals. The aim of this study is to describe our surgical technique and present comparative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 74 consecutive patients who underwent BE-TLIF at a total of 82 levels between January 2021 and July 2023 and were followed for at least 1 year after surgery. Patients were divided into two groups, the fixed portal group and the switching portal group, according to whether the switching portal technique was used for endplate preparation and insertion trajectory adjustment. Clinical and radiographical outcomes were analyzed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Endplate injuries were significantly more common in the fixed portal group than in the switching portal group. The modified McNab's criteria were not significantly different between the groups, but the switching portal group had a greater proportion of excellent and good outcomes (92.3%) than the fixed portal group did (82.9%). Cage subsidence occurred in 20.5% of patients in the fixed portal group and 4.7% in the switching portal group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The switching portal technique is safe and useful in BE-TLIF, as it enables effective disc preparation and ensures a precise trajectory for cage insertion, thereby significantly reducing the risks of endplate injury and cage subsidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"124511\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124511\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在双门静脉内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(be - tliff)中使用固定门静脉排列可能导致器械轨迹角度不理想,导致终板准备不足或cage植入困难。因此,我们提出了切换门户技术,使操作员能够切换观察和仪表门户。本研究的目的是描述我们的手术技术和目前的比较结果。方法:本研究纳入了74例连续患者,这些患者在2021年1月至2023年7月期间接受了总计82个级别的BE-TLIF,并在术后随访至少1年。根据是否使用切换门静脉技术制备终板及调整入路轨迹,将患者分为固定门静脉组和切换门静脉组。分析两组患者的临床和影像学结果。结果:固定门脉组终板损伤明显多于切换门脉组。改良的McNab标准在两组间无显著差异,但切换门静脉组优良率(92.3%)高于固定门静脉组(82.9%)。固定门静脉组有20.5%的患者发生笼型塌陷,切换门静脉组有4.7%的患者发生笼型塌陷。结论:切换门静脉技术在BE-TLIF中是安全且有用的,因为它可以有效地进行椎间盘准备,并确保精确的椎笼插入轨迹,从而显著降低终板损伤和椎笼下沉的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Novel Switching Portal Technique in Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Notes and Comparative Outcomes.

Objective: The use of a fixed portal arrangement during biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (BE-TLIF) may result in suboptimal instrument trajectory angles, leading to inadequate endplate preparation or difficulties in cage implantation. Therefore, we propose the switching portal technique, which enables the operator to switch the viewing and instrument portals. The aim of this study is to describe our surgical technique and present comparative outcomes.

Methods: This study included 74 consecutive patients who underwent BE-TLIF at a total of 82 levels between January 2021 and July 2023 and were followed for at least 1 year after surgery. Patients were divided into two groups, the fixed portal group and the switching portal group, according to whether the switching portal technique was used for endplate preparation and insertion trajectory adjustment. Clinical and radiographical outcomes were analyzed between the two groups.

Results: Endplate injuries were significantly more common in the fixed portal group than in the switching portal group. The modified McNab's criteria were not significantly different between the groups, but the switching portal group had a greater proportion of excellent and good outcomes (92.3%) than the fixed portal group did (82.9%). Cage subsidence occurred in 20.5% of patients in the fixed portal group and 4.7% in the switching portal group.

Conclusions: The switching portal technique is safe and useful in BE-TLIF, as it enables effective disc preparation and ensures a precise trajectory for cage insertion, thereby significantly reducing the risks of endplate injury and cage subsidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信