超声门上吞咽配合头屈加强喉闭。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Hiroko Kobayashi, Hitoshi Kagaya, Mao Ogawa, Keiko Aihara, Yoko Inamoto
{"title":"超声门上吞咽配合头屈加强喉闭。","authors":"Hiroko Kobayashi, Hitoshi Kagaya, Mao Ogawa, Keiko Aihara, Yoko Inamoto","doi":"10.1007/s00455-025-10891-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The super-supraglottic swallow (SSGS) improves laryngeal closure, and head flexion compensates for inadequate closure of the airway. These two procedures are typically utilized by speech-language pathologists for specific patient populations. This study compared the effect of the SSGS with head flexion (i.e., modified SSGS [mSSGS]) on laryngeal closure with that of usual swallowing and the SSGS in healthy individuals. Twenty-one healthy volunteers were instructed to swallow 4 ml of thin liquid barium in a sitting position during usual swallowing, SSGS, and mSSGS under X-ray fluoroscopy. The primary outcome was the distance between the epiglottis and arytenoid (DEA) at onset of the swallowing reflex. The secondary outcomes were DEA before onset of the swallowing reflex, the head flexion angle before and at onset of the swallowing reflex, and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) score. The relative ease of performing the mSSGS compared with the SSGS was evaluated using a 7-point Likert scale. DEA at onset of the swallowing reflex was significantly shorter with mSSGS than with usual swallowing (P < 0.001) or the SSGS (P = 0.006). DEA before swallowing was also significantly shorter with the mSSGS than with usual swallowing (P < 0.001) and the SSGS (P = 0.006). PAS score was 1 in all trials. The median Likert score was 3, indicating that the SSGS was easier than the mSSGS. The findings suggest that the mSSGS maneuver enhances laryngeal closure more than the SSGS maneuver and usual swallowing.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Super-Supraglottic Swallow Combined with Head Flexion Strengthens Laryngeal Closure.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroko Kobayashi, Hitoshi Kagaya, Mao Ogawa, Keiko Aihara, Yoko Inamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00455-025-10891-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The super-supraglottic swallow (SSGS) improves laryngeal closure, and head flexion compensates for inadequate closure of the airway. These two procedures are typically utilized by speech-language pathologists for specific patient populations. This study compared the effect of the SSGS with head flexion (i.e., modified SSGS [mSSGS]) on laryngeal closure with that of usual swallowing and the SSGS in healthy individuals. Twenty-one healthy volunteers were instructed to swallow 4 ml of thin liquid barium in a sitting position during usual swallowing, SSGS, and mSSGS under X-ray fluoroscopy. The primary outcome was the distance between the epiglottis and arytenoid (DEA) at onset of the swallowing reflex. The secondary outcomes were DEA before onset of the swallowing reflex, the head flexion angle before and at onset of the swallowing reflex, and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) score. The relative ease of performing the mSSGS compared with the SSGS was evaluated using a 7-point Likert scale. DEA at onset of the swallowing reflex was significantly shorter with mSSGS than with usual swallowing (P < 0.001) or the SSGS (P = 0.006). DEA before swallowing was also significantly shorter with the mSSGS than with usual swallowing (P < 0.001) and the SSGS (P = 0.006). PAS score was 1 in all trials. The median Likert score was 3, indicating that the SSGS was easier than the mSSGS. The findings suggest that the mSSGS maneuver enhances laryngeal closure more than the SSGS maneuver and usual swallowing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dysphagia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dysphagia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10891-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10891-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

超声门上吞咽(SSGS)改善喉关闭,头部屈曲补偿气道关闭不足。这两种程序通常由语言病理学家用于特定的患者群体。本研究比较了头部屈曲的SSGS(即改良的SSGS [mSSGS])与正常吞咽和健康个体的SSGS对喉闭合的影响。21名健康志愿者被要求在x线透视下,在正常吞咽、SSGS和mSSGS期间以坐姿吞下4ml薄液体钡。主要结果是在吞咽反射开始时会厌和杓状肌之间的距离(DEA)。次要指标为吞咽反射发生前的DEA、吞咽反射发生前和发生时的头屈角、穿透-吸入量表(PAS)评分。与SSGS相比,执行mSSGS的相对容易程度使用7分李克特量表进行评估。吞咽反射开始时的DEA明显短于正常吞咽组(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Super-Supraglottic Swallow Combined with Head Flexion Strengthens Laryngeal Closure.

The super-supraglottic swallow (SSGS) improves laryngeal closure, and head flexion compensates for inadequate closure of the airway. These two procedures are typically utilized by speech-language pathologists for specific patient populations. This study compared the effect of the SSGS with head flexion (i.e., modified SSGS [mSSGS]) on laryngeal closure with that of usual swallowing and the SSGS in healthy individuals. Twenty-one healthy volunteers were instructed to swallow 4 ml of thin liquid barium in a sitting position during usual swallowing, SSGS, and mSSGS under X-ray fluoroscopy. The primary outcome was the distance between the epiglottis and arytenoid (DEA) at onset of the swallowing reflex. The secondary outcomes were DEA before onset of the swallowing reflex, the head flexion angle before and at onset of the swallowing reflex, and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) score. The relative ease of performing the mSSGS compared with the SSGS was evaluated using a 7-point Likert scale. DEA at onset of the swallowing reflex was significantly shorter with mSSGS than with usual swallowing (P < 0.001) or the SSGS (P = 0.006). DEA before swallowing was also significantly shorter with the mSSGS than with usual swallowing (P < 0.001) and the SSGS (P = 0.006). PAS score was 1 in all trials. The median Likert score was 3, indicating that the SSGS was easier than the mSSGS. The findings suggest that the mSSGS maneuver enhances laryngeal closure more than the SSGS maneuver and usual swallowing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dysphagia
Dysphagia 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信