Anfeng Lu, Li Zhu, Peilu Huang, Lei Bi, Jinjie Huang, Zhangbin Yu, Benqing Wu, Guosheng Huang, Lu Ding, Ruirui Xing
{"title":"采用德尔菲法制定极早产儿母乳喂养质量指标。","authors":"Anfeng Lu, Li Zhu, Peilu Huang, Lei Bi, Jinjie Huang, Zhangbin Yu, Benqing Wu, Guosheng Huang, Lu Ding, Ruirui Xing","doi":"10.1177/08903344251365634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human milk protects very preterm infants from many complications. While quality indicators are crucial for evaluating and improving breastfeeding practices, those specifically tailored for very preterm infants are lacking.</p><p><strong>Research aim: </strong>To develop a set of practical and reliable indicators for evaluating and improving the quality of breastfeeding for very preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a longitudinal, prospective survey design utilizing a two-round Delphi method employing the RAND Corporation/University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method. A systematic search of the literature was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Wanfang, to identify potential quality indicators for breastfeeding in very preterm infants. A multidisciplinary expert panel then evaluated these through two Delphi rounds to establish relevance and feasibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two candidate quality indicators of breastfeeding were extracted for the Delphi process. The experts' authority coefficients for the two rounds were 0.84 and 0.83, respectively. Eleven indicators, encompassing breastfeeding outcome indicators (<i>n</i> = 1), mother's lactation status indicators (<i>n</i> = 3), the breastfeeding process indicators (<i>n</i> = 3), and balancing indicators (<i>n</i> = 4), were considered relevant and feasible and were incorporated into the set of quality indicators for breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study developed a set of practical and reliable indicators for evaluating and improving the quality of breastfeeding for very preterm infants, based on the collective opinion of content experts. These quality indicators may facilitate an objective and quantitative assessment of breastfeeding quality for this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Lactation","volume":" ","pages":"8903344251365634"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the Delphi Method to Develop Breastfeeding Quality Indicators for Very Preterm Infants.\",\"authors\":\"Anfeng Lu, Li Zhu, Peilu Huang, Lei Bi, Jinjie Huang, Zhangbin Yu, Benqing Wu, Guosheng Huang, Lu Ding, Ruirui Xing\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08903344251365634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human milk protects very preterm infants from many complications. While quality indicators are crucial for evaluating and improving breastfeeding practices, those specifically tailored for very preterm infants are lacking.</p><p><strong>Research aim: </strong>To develop a set of practical and reliable indicators for evaluating and improving the quality of breastfeeding for very preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a longitudinal, prospective survey design utilizing a two-round Delphi method employing the RAND Corporation/University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method. A systematic search of the literature was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Wanfang, to identify potential quality indicators for breastfeeding in very preterm infants. A multidisciplinary expert panel then evaluated these through two Delphi rounds to establish relevance and feasibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two candidate quality indicators of breastfeeding were extracted for the Delphi process. The experts' authority coefficients for the two rounds were 0.84 and 0.83, respectively. Eleven indicators, encompassing breastfeeding outcome indicators (<i>n</i> = 1), mother's lactation status indicators (<i>n</i> = 3), the breastfeeding process indicators (<i>n</i> = 3), and balancing indicators (<i>n</i> = 4), were considered relevant and feasible and were incorporated into the set of quality indicators for breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study developed a set of practical and reliable indicators for evaluating and improving the quality of breastfeeding for very preterm infants, based on the collective opinion of content experts. These quality indicators may facilitate an objective and quantitative assessment of breastfeeding quality for this vulnerable population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Lactation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8903344251365634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Lactation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344251365634\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Lactation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344251365634","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using the Delphi Method to Develop Breastfeeding Quality Indicators for Very Preterm Infants.
Background: Human milk protects very preterm infants from many complications. While quality indicators are crucial for evaluating and improving breastfeeding practices, those specifically tailored for very preterm infants are lacking.
Research aim: To develop a set of practical and reliable indicators for evaluating and improving the quality of breastfeeding for very preterm infants.
Methods: This study employed a longitudinal, prospective survey design utilizing a two-round Delphi method employing the RAND Corporation/University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method. A systematic search of the literature was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Wanfang, to identify potential quality indicators for breastfeeding in very preterm infants. A multidisciplinary expert panel then evaluated these through two Delphi rounds to establish relevance and feasibility.
Results: Twenty-two candidate quality indicators of breastfeeding were extracted for the Delphi process. The experts' authority coefficients for the two rounds were 0.84 and 0.83, respectively. Eleven indicators, encompassing breastfeeding outcome indicators (n = 1), mother's lactation status indicators (n = 3), the breastfeeding process indicators (n = 3), and balancing indicators (n = 4), were considered relevant and feasible and were incorporated into the set of quality indicators for breastfeeding.
Conclusions: This study developed a set of practical and reliable indicators for evaluating and improving the quality of breastfeeding for very preterm infants, based on the collective opinion of content experts. These quality indicators may facilitate an objective and quantitative assessment of breastfeeding quality for this vulnerable population.
期刊介绍:
Committed to the promotion of diversity and equity in all our policies and practices, our aims are:
To provide our readers and the international communities of clinicians, educators and scholars working in the field of lactation with current and quality-based evidence, from a broad array of disciplines, including the medical sciences, basic sciences, social sciences and the humanities.
To provide student and novice researchers, as well as, researchers whose native language is not English, with expert editorial guidance while preparing their work for publication in JHL.
In each issue, the Journal of Human Lactation publishes original research, original theoretical and conceptual articles, discussions of policy and practice issues, and the following special features:
Advocacy: A column that discusses a ‘hot’ topic in lactation advocacy
About Research: A column focused on an in-depth discussion of a different research topic each issue
Lactation Newsmakers: An interview with a widely-recognized outstanding expert in the field from around the globe
Research Commentary: A brief discussion of the issues raised in a specific research article published in the current issue
Book review(s): Reviews written by content experts about relevant new publications
International News Briefs: From major international lactation organizations.