短跑后立即间歇训练低剂量高压氧对有氧和无氧性能和恢复指标的协同作用:一项为期四周的随机对照试验。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Zepeng Hu, Wenjing Guo, Hao Wu
{"title":"短跑后立即间歇训练低剂量高压氧对有氧和无氧性能和恢复指标的协同作用:一项为期四周的随机对照试验。","authors":"Zepeng Hu, Wenjing Guo, Hao Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00421-025-05997-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated whether, and to what extent, immediate post-sprint interval training (SIT) low-dose hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) could augment adaptations in aerobic and anaerobic performance and recovery indicators in healthy men.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 4-week randomized controlled trial assigned 24 healthy men to either the SIT + HBO or SIT-only groups. Outcomes assessed pre- and post-intervention included aerobic and anaerobic performance, body composition, countermovement jump (CMJ), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Profile of Mood States (POMS), and heart rate variability (HRV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups significantly improved aerobic performance and body composition, with no between-group differences. However, SIT + HBO led to greater gains in anaerobic power indices: peak power (PP) (Δ: + 21.6% vs. + 11.9%, g = 0.69), peak power relative to body mass (PP kg⁻<sup>1</sup>) (Δ: + 24.1% vs. + 13.0%, g = 0.75) and mean power relative to body mass (MP kg⁻<sup>1</sup>) (Δ: + 31.6% vs. + 11.8%, g = 0.94). A significant interaction was also observed for mean power (MP) (Δ: + 24.5% vs. + 10.6%, g = 0.88), though post-hoc comparison was non-significant due to an outlier. Despite positive numerical trends, particularly for PSQI (p = 0.06), no significant synergistic effects were found for aerobic capacity, PSQI, or HRV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SIT improved aerobic and anaerobic performance and fat mass. Immediate post-SIT low-dose HBO yielded a synergistic benefit for anaerobic power, but not for aerobic or recovery outcomes. The small sample may have limited power and generalizability, increasing the risk of Type II errors. Future studies should clarify mechanisms and refine protocols via larger placebo-controlled trials with biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergistic effects of immediate post-sprint interval training low-dose hyperbaric oxygen on aerobic and anaerobic performance and recovery indicators: a four-week randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Zepeng Hu, Wenjing Guo, Hao Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-025-05997-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated whether, and to what extent, immediate post-sprint interval training (SIT) low-dose hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) could augment adaptations in aerobic and anaerobic performance and recovery indicators in healthy men.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 4-week randomized controlled trial assigned 24 healthy men to either the SIT + HBO or SIT-only groups. Outcomes assessed pre- and post-intervention included aerobic and anaerobic performance, body composition, countermovement jump (CMJ), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Profile of Mood States (POMS), and heart rate variability (HRV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups significantly improved aerobic performance and body composition, with no between-group differences. However, SIT + HBO led to greater gains in anaerobic power indices: peak power (PP) (Δ: + 21.6% vs. + 11.9%, g = 0.69), peak power relative to body mass (PP kg⁻<sup>1</sup>) (Δ: + 24.1% vs. + 13.0%, g = 0.75) and mean power relative to body mass (MP kg⁻<sup>1</sup>) (Δ: + 31.6% vs. + 11.8%, g = 0.94). A significant interaction was also observed for mean power (MP) (Δ: + 24.5% vs. + 10.6%, g = 0.88), though post-hoc comparison was non-significant due to an outlier. Despite positive numerical trends, particularly for PSQI (p = 0.06), no significant synergistic effects were found for aerobic capacity, PSQI, or HRV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SIT improved aerobic and anaerobic performance and fat mass. Immediate post-SIT low-dose HBO yielded a synergistic benefit for anaerobic power, but not for aerobic or recovery outcomes. The small sample may have limited power and generalizability, increasing the risk of Type II errors. Future studies should clarify mechanisms and refine protocols via larger placebo-controlled trials with biomarkers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05997-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05997-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨短跑后间歇训练(SIT)低剂量高压氧(HBO)是否以及在多大程度上增强健康男性有氧和无氧性能和恢复指标的适应性。方法:一项为期4周的随机对照试验,将24名健康男性分为SIT + HBO组或仅SIT组。干预前和干预后评估的结果包括有氧和无氧表现、身体成分、反运动跳跃(CMJ)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、情绪状态谱(POMS)和心率变异性(HRV)。结果:两组均显著改善了有氧运动性能和体成分,组间无差异。然而,SIT + HBO导致了更大的无氧能力指数的增加:峰值功率(PP) (Δ: + 21.6% vs + 11.9%, g = 0.69),相对于身体质量的峰值功率(PP kg - 1) (Δ: + 24.1% vs + 13.0%, g = 0.75)和相对于身体质量的平均功率(MP kg - 1) (Δ: + 31.6% vs + 11.8%, g = 0.94)。平均功率(MP)也观察到显著的相互作用(Δ: + 24.5% vs + 10.6%, g = 0.88),尽管由于异常值,事后比较不显著。尽管有积极的数值趋势,特别是PSQI (p = 0.06),但在有氧能力、PSQI或HRV方面没有发现显著的协同效应。结论:SIT改善了有氧和无氧性能和脂肪量。sit后立即低剂量HBO产生了厌氧能力的协同效益,但没有有氧或恢复结果。小样本可能具有有限的效力和普遍性,增加了II型错误的风险。未来的研究应该通过更大规模的生物标志物安慰剂对照试验来阐明机制和完善方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synergistic effects of immediate post-sprint interval training low-dose hyperbaric oxygen on aerobic and anaerobic performance and recovery indicators: a four-week randomized controlled trial.

Objective: This study investigated whether, and to what extent, immediate post-sprint interval training (SIT) low-dose hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) could augment adaptations in aerobic and anaerobic performance and recovery indicators in healthy men.

Methods: A 4-week randomized controlled trial assigned 24 healthy men to either the SIT + HBO or SIT-only groups. Outcomes assessed pre- and post-intervention included aerobic and anaerobic performance, body composition, countermovement jump (CMJ), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Profile of Mood States (POMS), and heart rate variability (HRV).

Results: Both groups significantly improved aerobic performance and body composition, with no between-group differences. However, SIT + HBO led to greater gains in anaerobic power indices: peak power (PP) (Δ: + 21.6% vs. + 11.9%, g = 0.69), peak power relative to body mass (PP kg⁻1) (Δ: + 24.1% vs. + 13.0%, g = 0.75) and mean power relative to body mass (MP kg⁻1) (Δ: + 31.6% vs. + 11.8%, g = 0.94). A significant interaction was also observed for mean power (MP) (Δ: + 24.5% vs. + 10.6%, g = 0.88), though post-hoc comparison was non-significant due to an outlier. Despite positive numerical trends, particularly for PSQI (p = 0.06), no significant synergistic effects were found for aerobic capacity, PSQI, or HRV.

Conclusion: SIT improved aerobic and anaerobic performance and fat mass. Immediate post-SIT low-dose HBO yielded a synergistic benefit for anaerobic power, but not for aerobic or recovery outcomes. The small sample may have limited power and generalizability, increasing the risk of Type II errors. Future studies should clarify mechanisms and refine protocols via larger placebo-controlled trials with biomarkers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信