药物包被球囊单独与联合临时支架治疗复杂股腘动脉病变的疗效和安全性。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Qinghe Wang, Zishun Liang, Qian Ni, Chen Tang, Yutong Liu, Biao Zhao, Jing Cai, Tong Qiao
{"title":"药物包被球囊单独与联合临时支架治疗复杂股腘动脉病变的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Qinghe Wang, Zishun Liang, Qian Ni, Chen Tang, Yutong Liu, Biao Zhao, Jing Cai, Tong Qiao","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Complex femoropopliteal artery (FPA) lesions often require provisional stenting after suboptimal drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. This study compared midterm efficacy and safety of DCB alone versus DCB with provisional bare-metal stenting (BMS) in such lesions. In this retrospective cohort study, 326 propensity score-matched patients (163 per group) treated for FPA disease (2018-2022) were analyzed. Primary effectiveness endpoints were 24-month primary patency (PP) and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (FCD-TLR). Primary safety endpoints included amputation-free survival (AFS) and all-cause mortality. The stented group had longer lesions (21.2 vs. 17.6 cm, P=0.003), lower ankle-brachial index (0.32 vs. 0.48, P<0.001), and more severe calcification (29.8% vs. 20.6%, P=0.009). At 24 months, PP (83.9% vs. 83.5%, log-rank P=0.873) and FCD-TLR (86.3% vs. 85.9%, P=0.853) were comparable. AFS (92.3% vs. 94.1%, P=0.508) and mortality (1.8% vs. 2.4%, P=0.715) also showed no significant differences. Secondary outcomes were similar. In conclusion, DCB with provisional BMS demonstrates comparable midterm efficacy and safety to DCB alone for complex FPA lesions, supporting provisional BMS use when suboptimal results occur.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Coated Balloons Alone Versus Combined with Provisional Stenting for Complex Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Qinghe Wang, Zishun Liang, Qian Ni, Chen Tang, Yutong Liu, Biao Zhao, Jing Cai, Tong Qiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Complex femoropopliteal artery (FPA) lesions often require provisional stenting after suboptimal drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. This study compared midterm efficacy and safety of DCB alone versus DCB with provisional bare-metal stenting (BMS) in such lesions. In this retrospective cohort study, 326 propensity score-matched patients (163 per group) treated for FPA disease (2018-2022) were analyzed. Primary effectiveness endpoints were 24-month primary patency (PP) and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (FCD-TLR). Primary safety endpoints included amputation-free survival (AFS) and all-cause mortality. The stented group had longer lesions (21.2 vs. 17.6 cm, P=0.003), lower ankle-brachial index (0.32 vs. 0.48, P<0.001), and more severe calcification (29.8% vs. 20.6%, P=0.009). At 24 months, PP (83.9% vs. 83.5%, log-rank P=0.873) and FCD-TLR (86.3% vs. 85.9%, P=0.853) were comparable. AFS (92.3% vs. 94.1%, P=0.508) and mortality (1.8% vs. 2.4%, P=0.715) also showed no significant differences. Secondary outcomes were similar. In conclusion, DCB with provisional BMS demonstrates comparable midterm efficacy and safety to DCB alone for complex FPA lesions, supporting provisional BMS use when suboptimal results occur.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复杂的股腘动脉(FPA)病变通常需要在次优药物包被球囊(DCB)血管成形术后临时支架植入术。本研究比较了DCB单独与DCB联合临时裸金属支架(BMS)治疗此类病变的中期疗效和安全性。在这项回顾性队列研究中,分析了326例倾向评分匹配的FPA疾病患者(每组163例)(2018-2022)。主要疗效终点为24个月原发性通畅(PP)和免于临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(FCD-TLR)。主要安全终点包括无截肢生存期(AFS)和全因死亡率。支架组病变较长(21.2 vs. 17.6 cm, P=0.003),踝肱指数较低(0.32 vs. 0.48, P=0.003)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Coated Balloons Alone Versus Combined with Provisional Stenting for Complex Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions.

Complex femoropopliteal artery (FPA) lesions often require provisional stenting after suboptimal drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. This study compared midterm efficacy and safety of DCB alone versus DCB with provisional bare-metal stenting (BMS) in such lesions. In this retrospective cohort study, 326 propensity score-matched patients (163 per group) treated for FPA disease (2018-2022) were analyzed. Primary effectiveness endpoints were 24-month primary patency (PP) and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (FCD-TLR). Primary safety endpoints included amputation-free survival (AFS) and all-cause mortality. The stented group had longer lesions (21.2 vs. 17.6 cm, P=0.003), lower ankle-brachial index (0.32 vs. 0.48, P<0.001), and more severe calcification (29.8% vs. 20.6%, P=0.009). At 24 months, PP (83.9% vs. 83.5%, log-rank P=0.873) and FCD-TLR (86.3% vs. 85.9%, P=0.853) were comparable. AFS (92.3% vs. 94.1%, P=0.508) and mortality (1.8% vs. 2.4%, P=0.715) also showed no significant differences. Secondary outcomes were similar. In conclusion, DCB with provisional BMS demonstrates comparable midterm efficacy and safety to DCB alone for complex FPA lesions, supporting provisional BMS use when suboptimal results occur.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信