扩大目标区域,提高潜在分布预测的准确性,增强优先保护区的有效性

IF 4.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Jin Ye, Feiling Yang, Jinming Hu, Hengying Wang, Jihong Xu, Zhongxing Yang, Feng Liu, Jian Zhou, Jing Gong, Bing Han, Xuexin Yang, Ruidong Wu
{"title":"扩大目标区域,提高潜在分布预测的准确性,增强优先保护区的有效性","authors":"Jin Ye,&nbsp;Feiling Yang,&nbsp;Jinming Hu,&nbsp;Hengying Wang,&nbsp;Jihong Xu,&nbsp;Zhongxing Yang,&nbsp;Feng Liu,&nbsp;Jian Zhou,&nbsp;Jing Gong,&nbsp;Bing Han,&nbsp;Xuexin Yang,&nbsp;Ruidong Wu","doi":"10.1111/ddi.70087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Subjective study area delineation in conservation planning often overlooks species occurrences integrality, truncating the ecological niches. Incorporating occurrences from expanded areas into species distribution prediction within the study area provides an innovative approach to mitigate negative impacts, but the conservation effectiveness of this approach requires further clarification.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>We selected the Southeast Himalaya Biodiversity Priority Conservation Area and the Himalayas biogeographic region as the target and expanded areas, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We set three scenarios by extracting species occurrences from the target area, expanded area, and both areas (scenarios 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Using MaxEnt for predicting the potential distributions of species (SPDs) and Zonation for identifying priority conservation areas (PCAs) across the three scenarios, we evaluated the SPD prediction accuracy, conservation effectiveness, and ecological representativeness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Incorporating data from the expanded area in scenarios 2 and 3 improved the prediction accuracy and covered a wider SPD range than scenario 1. High-richness areas and PCAs in scenarios 2 and 3 were identified in the Kangrigebu South Wing Mountains, Salween and Lancangjiang Incisive Mountains, and southern Brahmaputra Great Turn and Upper Salween Incisive Mountains. These PCAs improved the coverage of the SPD areas (77.74%–82.20%) and priority forest and wetland ecosystems (11.86%–12.84%). In contrast, the PCAs in scenario 1 had a relatively larger distribution in the Himalayas Central Mountains, covering a higher proportion of their own SPD areas (83.75%) and priority steppe ecosystem (31.55%). Overall, scenarios 2 and 3 demonstrated greater conservation effectiveness and ecological representativeness, with minimal differences between them, and both outperformed scenario 1.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study proposed an innovative approach that expanded the study area to biogeographic regions and supplemented species occurrences from these expanded areas, thereby improving the prediction accuracy of SPDs and conservation effectiveness, while providing an easily implementable and generalizable framework in data deficient areas.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"31 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.70087","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Accuracy of Predicted Potential Distributions and Enhancing the Effectiveness of Priority Conservation Areas for Protected Species by Expanding the Target Area\",\"authors\":\"Jin Ye,&nbsp;Feiling Yang,&nbsp;Jinming Hu,&nbsp;Hengying Wang,&nbsp;Jihong Xu,&nbsp;Zhongxing Yang,&nbsp;Feng Liu,&nbsp;Jian Zhou,&nbsp;Jing Gong,&nbsp;Bing Han,&nbsp;Xuexin Yang,&nbsp;Ruidong Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ddi.70087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Subjective study area delineation in conservation planning often overlooks species occurrences integrality, truncating the ecological niches. Incorporating occurrences from expanded areas into species distribution prediction within the study area provides an innovative approach to mitigate negative impacts, but the conservation effectiveness of this approach requires further clarification.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>We selected the Southeast Himalaya Biodiversity Priority Conservation Area and the Himalayas biogeographic region as the target and expanded areas, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We set three scenarios by extracting species occurrences from the target area, expanded area, and both areas (scenarios 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Using MaxEnt for predicting the potential distributions of species (SPDs) and Zonation for identifying priority conservation areas (PCAs) across the three scenarios, we evaluated the SPD prediction accuracy, conservation effectiveness, and ecological representativeness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Incorporating data from the expanded area in scenarios 2 and 3 improved the prediction accuracy and covered a wider SPD range than scenario 1. High-richness areas and PCAs in scenarios 2 and 3 were identified in the Kangrigebu South Wing Mountains, Salween and Lancangjiang Incisive Mountains, and southern Brahmaputra Great Turn and Upper Salween Incisive Mountains. These PCAs improved the coverage of the SPD areas (77.74%–82.20%) and priority forest and wetland ecosystems (11.86%–12.84%). In contrast, the PCAs in scenario 1 had a relatively larger distribution in the Himalayas Central Mountains, covering a higher proportion of their own SPD areas (83.75%) and priority steppe ecosystem (31.55%). Overall, scenarios 2 and 3 demonstrated greater conservation effectiveness and ecological representativeness, with minimal differences between them, and both outperformed scenario 1.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study proposed an innovative approach that expanded the study area to biogeographic regions and supplemented species occurrences from these expanded areas, thereby improving the prediction accuracy of SPDs and conservation effectiveness, while providing an easily implementable and generalizable framework in data deficient areas.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diversity and Distributions\",\"volume\":\"31 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.70087\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diversity and Distributions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.70087\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.70087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在自然保护规划中,主观划定研究区往往忽视物种分布的完整性,截断生态位。将扩大区域的发生情况纳入研究区域内的物种分布预测提供了一种减轻负面影响的创新方法,但这种方法的保护效果需要进一步澄清。我们选择了喜马拉雅东南部生物多样性优先保护区和喜马拉雅生物地理区域作为目标区和扩展区。方法分别从目标区、扩展区和两区提取物种发生情况,设置3种情景(情景1、情景2和情景3)。利用MaxEnt预测三种情景下物种的潜在分布和优先保护区的区划,对SPD的预测精度、保护效果和生态代表性进行了评价。结果与情景1相比,情景2和情景3中扩展区域的数据提高了预测精度,覆盖的SPD范围更广。2、3情景下的高丰饶区和高丰饶区分别位于康日格布南翼山脉、萨尔温江和澜沧江陡坡山脉、雅鲁藏布江大转弯处南部和萨尔温江陡坡上。这些措施提高了森林保护地的覆盖率(77.74% ~ 82.20%)和重点森林湿地生态系统的覆盖率(11.86% ~ 12.84%)。相比之下,情景1中pca在喜马拉雅中部地区的分布相对较大,占自身SPD区域的比例较高(83.75%),优先草原生态系统占31.55%。总体而言,情景2和情景3表现出更大的保护效果和生态代表性,两者之间的差异很小,两者都优于情景1。本研究提出了一种创新的方法,将研究范围扩大到生物地理区域,并补充这些扩展区域的物种发生情况,从而提高了SPDs的预测精度和保护效果,同时为数据不足地区提供了一个易于实施和推广的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Improving the Accuracy of Predicted Potential Distributions and Enhancing the Effectiveness of Priority Conservation Areas for Protected Species by Expanding the Target Area

Improving the Accuracy of Predicted Potential Distributions and Enhancing the Effectiveness of Priority Conservation Areas for Protected Species by Expanding the Target Area

Aim

Subjective study area delineation in conservation planning often overlooks species occurrences integrality, truncating the ecological niches. Incorporating occurrences from expanded areas into species distribution prediction within the study area provides an innovative approach to mitigate negative impacts, but the conservation effectiveness of this approach requires further clarification.

Location

We selected the Southeast Himalaya Biodiversity Priority Conservation Area and the Himalayas biogeographic region as the target and expanded areas, respectively.

Methods

We set three scenarios by extracting species occurrences from the target area, expanded area, and both areas (scenarios 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Using MaxEnt for predicting the potential distributions of species (SPDs) and Zonation for identifying priority conservation areas (PCAs) across the three scenarios, we evaluated the SPD prediction accuracy, conservation effectiveness, and ecological representativeness.

Results

Incorporating data from the expanded area in scenarios 2 and 3 improved the prediction accuracy and covered a wider SPD range than scenario 1. High-richness areas and PCAs in scenarios 2 and 3 were identified in the Kangrigebu South Wing Mountains, Salween and Lancangjiang Incisive Mountains, and southern Brahmaputra Great Turn and Upper Salween Incisive Mountains. These PCAs improved the coverage of the SPD areas (77.74%–82.20%) and priority forest and wetland ecosystems (11.86%–12.84%). In contrast, the PCAs in scenario 1 had a relatively larger distribution in the Himalayas Central Mountains, covering a higher proportion of their own SPD areas (83.75%) and priority steppe ecosystem (31.55%). Overall, scenarios 2 and 3 demonstrated greater conservation effectiveness and ecological representativeness, with minimal differences between them, and both outperformed scenario 1.

Main Conclusions

Our study proposed an innovative approach that expanded the study area to biogeographic regions and supplemented species occurrences from these expanded areas, thereby improving the prediction accuracy of SPDs and conservation effectiveness, while providing an easily implementable and generalizable framework in data deficient areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diversity and Distributions
Diversity and Distributions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
195
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信