谷物、可可和畜牧业的剩余分配方式不同吗?西非农业制度中阶级关系的系统文献分析

IF 2.9 2区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Sarah Lena Graf, Nikola Blaschke, Carlos Oya
{"title":"谷物、可可和畜牧业的剩余分配方式不同吗?西非农业制度中阶级关系的系统文献分析","authors":"Sarah Lena Graf,&nbsp;Nikola Blaschke,&nbsp;Carlos Oya","doi":"10.1111/joac.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper synthesizes and systematizes existing empirical knowledge on agrarian class relations in West Africa. It contributes to the debate on agrarian transitions, which largely neglects coexisting diverse forms of class relations in land, labour and capital markets, and how these are interrelated with different agricultural production processes. Based on a systematic review of 196 published articles, we developed a typology of class relations, which we then used to analyse linkages between forms of class relations and production processes in three agricultural activities, namely, arable crops, tree crops and (agro-)pastoral ruminant herds. The paper highlights the relevance of specific farming practices as well as herd and plot level analysis for agrarian political economy. Class relations and farming practices are intertwined and mutually dependent. We do not only identify class relations specific to certain agricultural activities, but we also outlined how farming systems and class relations coevolve over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.70022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Surplus Appropriated Differently in Cereals, Cocoa and Cattle Production? A Systematic Literature Analysis of Class Relations in West African Farming Systems\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Lena Graf,&nbsp;Nikola Blaschke,&nbsp;Carlos Oya\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joac.70022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper synthesizes and systematizes existing empirical knowledge on agrarian class relations in West Africa. It contributes to the debate on agrarian transitions, which largely neglects coexisting diverse forms of class relations in land, labour and capital markets, and how these are interrelated with different agricultural production processes. Based on a systematic review of 196 published articles, we developed a typology of class relations, which we then used to analyse linkages between forms of class relations and production processes in three agricultural activities, namely, arable crops, tree crops and (agro-)pastoral ruminant herds. The paper highlights the relevance of specific farming practices as well as herd and plot level analysis for agrarian political economy. Class relations and farming practices are intertwined and mutually dependent. We do not only identify class relations specific to certain agricultural activities, but we also outlined how farming systems and class relations coevolve over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agrarian Change\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.70022\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agrarian Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joac.70022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agrarian Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joac.70022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文综合并系统化了已有的关于西非土地阶级关系的经验知识。它助长了关于土地转型的辩论,这种辩论在很大程度上忽视了土地、劳动力和资本市场中共存的各种形式的阶级关系,以及这些关系如何与不同的农业生产过程相互关联。基于对196篇已发表文章的系统回顾,我们开发了一个阶级关系的类型学,然后我们用它来分析三种农业活动中阶级关系的形式与生产过程之间的联系,即可耕地作物、树木作物和(农业)畜牧反刍动物群。这篇论文强调了特定耕作方式以及牧群和地块水平分析与农业政治经济学的相关性。阶级关系和农业实践是相互交织、相互依存的。我们不仅确定了特定于某些农业活动的阶级关系,而且还概述了农业系统和阶级关系如何随着时间的推移而共同进化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Is Surplus Appropriated Differently in Cereals, Cocoa and Cattle Production? A Systematic Literature Analysis of Class Relations in West African Farming Systems

Is Surplus Appropriated Differently in Cereals, Cocoa and Cattle Production? A Systematic Literature Analysis of Class Relations in West African Farming Systems

This paper synthesizes and systematizes existing empirical knowledge on agrarian class relations in West Africa. It contributes to the debate on agrarian transitions, which largely neglects coexisting diverse forms of class relations in land, labour and capital markets, and how these are interrelated with different agricultural production processes. Based on a systematic review of 196 published articles, we developed a typology of class relations, which we then used to analyse linkages between forms of class relations and production processes in three agricultural activities, namely, arable crops, tree crops and (agro-)pastoral ruminant herds. The paper highlights the relevance of specific farming practices as well as herd and plot level analysis for agrarian political economy. Class relations and farming practices are intertwined and mutually dependent. We do not only identify class relations specific to certain agricultural activities, but we also outlined how farming systems and class relations coevolve over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agrarian Change is a journal of agrarian political economy. It promotes investigation of the social relations and dynamics of production, property and power in agrarian formations and their processes of change, both historical and contemporary. It encourages work within a broad interdisciplinary framework, informed by theory, and serves as a forum for serious comparative analysis and scholarly debate. Contributions are welcomed from political economists, historians, anthropologists, sociologists, political scientists, economists, geographers, lawyers, and others committed to the rigorous study and analysis of agrarian structure and change, past and present, in different parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信