{"title":"科学和宗教的文化权威","authors":"Shiri Noy , Timothy L. O'Brien","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As two of society's most influential cultural authorities, science and religion shape perceptions of both truth and morality. While science is often linked to factual knowledge and religion to moral judgment, their boundaries are often blurred and contested. This review integrates insights from sociology and psychology to examine how science and religion assert, sustain, and lose authority in contemporary societies. Drawing on recent empirical research, including cross-national comparisons, time-trend analysis, and the role of moral framing, we show that trust in science and religion is context-dependent and shaped by institutional settings, social identities, and moral resonance. We argue that cultural authority is not fixed but constructed through interactions among individuals, institutions, and widely shared narratives about empirical truth and moral values. Future research should engage comparative, intersectional, and moral dimensions to better understand how science and religion function as competing or complementary sources of cultural authority.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102180"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cultural authority of science and religion\",\"authors\":\"Shiri Noy , Timothy L. O'Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As two of society's most influential cultural authorities, science and religion shape perceptions of both truth and morality. While science is often linked to factual knowledge and religion to moral judgment, their boundaries are often blurred and contested. This review integrates insights from sociology and psychology to examine how science and religion assert, sustain, and lose authority in contemporary societies. Drawing on recent empirical research, including cross-national comparisons, time-trend analysis, and the role of moral framing, we show that trust in science and religion is context-dependent and shaped by institutional settings, social identities, and moral resonance. We argue that cultural authority is not fixed but constructed through interactions among individuals, institutions, and widely shared narratives about empirical truth and moral values. Future research should engage comparative, intersectional, and moral dimensions to better understand how science and religion function as competing or complementary sources of cultural authority.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001939\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001939","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
As two of society's most influential cultural authorities, science and religion shape perceptions of both truth and morality. While science is often linked to factual knowledge and religion to moral judgment, their boundaries are often blurred and contested. This review integrates insights from sociology and psychology to examine how science and religion assert, sustain, and lose authority in contemporary societies. Drawing on recent empirical research, including cross-national comparisons, time-trend analysis, and the role of moral framing, we show that trust in science and religion is context-dependent and shaped by institutional settings, social identities, and moral resonance. We argue that cultural authority is not fixed but constructed through interactions among individuals, institutions, and widely shared narratives about empirical truth and moral values. Future research should engage comparative, intersectional, and moral dimensions to better understand how science and religion function as competing or complementary sources of cultural authority.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology