科学素养和对科学事实的接受

IF 6.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Aart van Stekelenburg
{"title":"科学素养和对科学事实的接受","authors":"Aart van Stekelenburg","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Science communication research provides insight into the role of science literacy in the acceptance of scientific facts. While it makes intuitive sense to expect the ability to understand and use science to be positively related to belief in scientific facts, some influential works have instead suggested that science literacy leads to polarization on controversial science topics. More recent studies, made possible by developments in the definition and measurement of science literacy, indicate that it is positively correlated with belief in scientific facts and likely does not lead to belief polarization in most situations. Still, more research investigating the various aspects of science literacy, testing the causal effect of improving it, and with samples from various countries and clear reporting of outcome variables is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102183"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science literacy and the acceptance of scientific facts\",\"authors\":\"Aart van Stekelenburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Science communication research provides insight into the role of science literacy in the acceptance of scientific facts. While it makes intuitive sense to expect the ability to understand and use science to be positively related to belief in scientific facts, some influential works have instead suggested that science literacy leads to polarization on controversial science topics. More recent studies, made possible by developments in the definition and measurement of science literacy, indicate that it is positively correlated with belief in scientific facts and likely does not lead to belief polarization in most situations. Still, more research investigating the various aspects of science literacy, testing the causal effect of improving it, and with samples from various countries and clear reporting of outcome variables is needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001964\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001964","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科学传播研究提供了对科学素养在接受科学事实中的作用的洞察。虽然直观地认为理解和运用科学的能力与对科学事实的信仰呈正相关,但一些有影响力的作品却表明,科学素养导致了在有争议的科学话题上的两极分化。由于科学素养的定义和测量的发展,最近的研究表明,它与对科学事实的信念呈正相关,在大多数情况下可能不会导致信念两极分化。尽管如此,还需要更多的研究来调查科学素养的各个方面,测试提高科学素养的因果关系,并从不同的国家收集样本,明确报告结果变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Science literacy and the acceptance of scientific facts
Science communication research provides insight into the role of science literacy in the acceptance of scientific facts. While it makes intuitive sense to expect the ability to understand and use science to be positively related to belief in scientific facts, some influential works have instead suggested that science literacy leads to polarization on controversial science topics. More recent studies, made possible by developments in the definition and measurement of science literacy, indicate that it is positively correlated with belief in scientific facts and likely does not lead to belief polarization in most situations. Still, more research investigating the various aspects of science literacy, testing the causal effect of improving it, and with samples from various countries and clear reporting of outcome variables is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychology
Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
293
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信