Haifaa Kashkari,Prakesh S Shah,Jehier K Afifi,Eugene Yoon,Joan M Crane,Sarah D McDONALD,Marc Beltempo,Walid I El-Naggar,
{"title":"剖宫产极早产儿的脐带管理。","authors":"Haifaa Kashkari,Prakesh S Shah,Jehier K Afifi,Eugene Yoon,Joan M Crane,Sarah D McDONALD,Marc Beltempo,Walid I El-Naggar, ","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.09.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nDeferred cord clamping reduces mortality in preterm infants. However, there is a controversy whether it is as effective in cesarean deliveries as in vaginal deliveries.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVES\r\nTo compare mortality and short-term outcomes of extremely preterm singleton infants who received deferred cord clamping after cesarean deliveries with those who received it after vaginal deliveries and those who received early cord clamping after cesarean deliveries.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nWe conducted a national retrospective review of maternal, perinatal, and neonatal data of preterm infants <29 weeks' gestation who were admitted to units participating in the Canadian Neonatal Network between January 2015 and December 2022. We assessed the rates and trends of deferred cord clamping (≥ 30 seconds) and compared infants who received deferred cord clamping after cesarean deliveries with: (a) those who received deferred cord clamping after vaginal deliveries and (b) those who received early cord clamping (< 30 seconds) after caesarean deliveries. Our primary outcome was hospital mortality/severe brain injury (defined as grade 3/4 intraventricular hemorrhage and/or periventricular leukomalacia). Multivariable regression models with generalized estimation equation were used to account for clustering of infants within each site after adjusting for potential confounders.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 6137 infants included, 1952 (31.8%) received deferred cord clamping after cesarean deliveries, 1804 (29.4%) received it after vaginal deliveries and 2381 (38.8%) received early cord clamping after cesarean deliveries at a median (IQR) gestational age of 27 (25, 28), 26 (25, 28) and 26 (25, 28) weeks, respectively. There was a slow increase in practicing deferred cord clamping in cesarean deliveries from 32% in 2015 to ∼50% in 2021-2022. After adjustment for potential confounders, infants who received deferred cord clamping after cesarean deliveries had lower odds of a composite of mortality/severe brain injury [281/1952 (14%)] than those who received deferred cord clamping after vaginal deliveries [347/1804 (19%)]; aOR (95% CI): 0.69 (0.54, 0.87) and those who received early cord clamping after cesarean deliveries [543/2381 (23%)]; aOR (95% CI): 0.69 (0.57, 0.83). Deferred cord clamping after cesarean deliveries was not associated with significant changes in other adverse short-term outcomes.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nDeferred cord clamping is associated with reduction in a composite of mortality/ severe brain injury in singleton preterm infants <29 weeks' gestation born by cesarean delivery.","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Umbilical Cord Management in Extremely Preterm Infants Born by Cesarean Delivery.\",\"authors\":\"Haifaa Kashkari,Prakesh S Shah,Jehier K Afifi,Eugene Yoon,Joan M Crane,Sarah D McDONALD,Marc Beltempo,Walid I El-Naggar, \",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.09.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nDeferred cord clamping reduces mortality in preterm infants. However, there is a controversy whether it is as effective in cesarean deliveries as in vaginal deliveries.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVES\\r\\nTo compare mortality and short-term outcomes of extremely preterm singleton infants who received deferred cord clamping after cesarean deliveries with those who received it after vaginal deliveries and those who received early cord clamping after cesarean deliveries.\\r\\n\\r\\nSTUDY DESIGN\\r\\nWe conducted a national retrospective review of maternal, perinatal, and neonatal data of preterm infants <29 weeks' gestation who were admitted to units participating in the Canadian Neonatal Network between January 2015 and December 2022. We assessed the rates and trends of deferred cord clamping (≥ 30 seconds) and compared infants who received deferred cord clamping after cesarean deliveries with: (a) those who received deferred cord clamping after vaginal deliveries and (b) those who received early cord clamping (< 30 seconds) after caesarean deliveries. Our primary outcome was hospital mortality/severe brain injury (defined as grade 3/4 intraventricular hemorrhage and/or periventricular leukomalacia). Multivariable regression models with generalized estimation equation were used to account for clustering of infants within each site after adjusting for potential confounders.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOf 6137 infants included, 1952 (31.8%) received deferred cord clamping after cesarean deliveries, 1804 (29.4%) received it after vaginal deliveries and 2381 (38.8%) received early cord clamping after cesarean deliveries at a median (IQR) gestational age of 27 (25, 28), 26 (25, 28) and 26 (25, 28) weeks, respectively. There was a slow increase in practicing deferred cord clamping in cesarean deliveries from 32% in 2015 to ∼50% in 2021-2022. After adjustment for potential confounders, infants who received deferred cord clamping after cesarean deliveries had lower odds of a composite of mortality/severe brain injury [281/1952 (14%)] than those who received deferred cord clamping after vaginal deliveries [347/1804 (19%)]; aOR (95% CI): 0.69 (0.54, 0.87) and those who received early cord clamping after cesarean deliveries [543/2381 (23%)]; aOR (95% CI): 0.69 (0.57, 0.83). Deferred cord clamping after cesarean deliveries was not associated with significant changes in other adverse short-term outcomes.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nDeferred cord clamping is associated with reduction in a composite of mortality/ severe brain injury in singleton preterm infants <29 weeks' gestation born by cesarean delivery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.09.036\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.09.036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Umbilical Cord Management in Extremely Preterm Infants Born by Cesarean Delivery.
BACKGROUND
Deferred cord clamping reduces mortality in preterm infants. However, there is a controversy whether it is as effective in cesarean deliveries as in vaginal deliveries.
OBJECTIVES
To compare mortality and short-term outcomes of extremely preterm singleton infants who received deferred cord clamping after cesarean deliveries with those who received it after vaginal deliveries and those who received early cord clamping after cesarean deliveries.
STUDY DESIGN
We conducted a national retrospective review of maternal, perinatal, and neonatal data of preterm infants <29 weeks' gestation who were admitted to units participating in the Canadian Neonatal Network between January 2015 and December 2022. We assessed the rates and trends of deferred cord clamping (≥ 30 seconds) and compared infants who received deferred cord clamping after cesarean deliveries with: (a) those who received deferred cord clamping after vaginal deliveries and (b) those who received early cord clamping (< 30 seconds) after caesarean deliveries. Our primary outcome was hospital mortality/severe brain injury (defined as grade 3/4 intraventricular hemorrhage and/or periventricular leukomalacia). Multivariable regression models with generalized estimation equation were used to account for clustering of infants within each site after adjusting for potential confounders.
RESULTS
Of 6137 infants included, 1952 (31.8%) received deferred cord clamping after cesarean deliveries, 1804 (29.4%) received it after vaginal deliveries and 2381 (38.8%) received early cord clamping after cesarean deliveries at a median (IQR) gestational age of 27 (25, 28), 26 (25, 28) and 26 (25, 28) weeks, respectively. There was a slow increase in practicing deferred cord clamping in cesarean deliveries from 32% in 2015 to ∼50% in 2021-2022. After adjustment for potential confounders, infants who received deferred cord clamping after cesarean deliveries had lower odds of a composite of mortality/severe brain injury [281/1952 (14%)] than those who received deferred cord clamping after vaginal deliveries [347/1804 (19%)]; aOR (95% CI): 0.69 (0.54, 0.87) and those who received early cord clamping after cesarean deliveries [543/2381 (23%)]; aOR (95% CI): 0.69 (0.57, 0.83). Deferred cord clamping after cesarean deliveries was not associated with significant changes in other adverse short-term outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Deferred cord clamping is associated with reduction in a composite of mortality/ severe brain injury in singleton preterm infants <29 weeks' gestation born by cesarean delivery.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare.
Focus Areas:
Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders.
Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases.
Content Types:
Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles.
Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology.
Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field.
Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews.
Peer Review Process:
All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.