脂肪性肝病的载脂蛋白水平:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2
Rania Abdulredha, Giuseppe Guido Maria Scarlata, Micha Gruber, Daniel-Corneliu Leucuta, Stefan-Lucian Popa, Ludovico Abenavoli, Abdulrahman Ismaiel, Dan Lucian Dumitrascu
{"title":"脂肪性肝病的载脂蛋白水平:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Rania Abdulredha, Giuseppe Guido Maria Scarlata, Micha Gruber, Daniel-Corneliu Leucuta, Stefan-Lucian Popa, Ludovico Abenavoli, Abdulrahman Ismaiel, Dan Lucian Dumitrascu","doi":"10.15403/jgld-6289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Fatty liver disease (FLD) is a prevalent condition linked to metabolic disorders and can progress to severe liver diseases. Alterations in apolipoprotein (Apo) levels may provide valuable insights for diagnosing and managing FLD. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates these changes across different FLD phenotypes to evaluate their potential as diagnostic biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated studies from PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus using a predefined search string. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The main summary outcome was the mean difference (MD) in Apo levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 773 initial articles, 55 studies involving 432,328 individuals were included. In NAFLD patients vs. controls, ApoA levels showed a MD of -0.029 (95% CI: -0.133, 0.075), ApoA-I had a MD of -0.064 (95%CI: -0.107, -0.021), and ApoB levels had a MD of 0.098 (95%CI: 0.076, 0.120), while ApoB100 had an MD of 0.042 (95% CI: 0.008, 0.076). For NASH vs. controls, ApoA-I levels had a MD of -0.108 (95% CI: -0.125, -0.091) and ApoB levels had a MD of 0.123 (95% CI: 0.054, 0.193), while ApoB100 had a MD of 0.042 (95% CI: -0.051,0.136). In MAFLD vs. controls, ApoA-I levels had a MD of -0.068 (95% CI: -0.124, -0.012) and ApoB a MD of 0.099 (95% CI: 0.091, 0.107). For diabetic NAFLD vs. T2DM (type 2 diabetes mellitus) without NAFLD, ApoA levels had an MD of 0.028 (95% CI: -0.147, 0.204) and ApoB levels an MD of 0.081 (95% CI: 0.040, 0.122).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In NAFLD patients, ApoA-I levels were lower and ApoB and ApoB100 levels were higher compared to controls, with similar patterns seen in NASH patients, who also had higher ApoB levels than those with simple steatosis. MAFLD patients had elevated ApoB and ApoE levels, while overweight/obese NAFLD patients had higher ApoB levels than controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":94081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","volume":"34 3","pages":"350-361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apolipoproteins Levels in Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rania Abdulredha, Giuseppe Guido Maria Scarlata, Micha Gruber, Daniel-Corneliu Leucuta, Stefan-Lucian Popa, Ludovico Abenavoli, Abdulrahman Ismaiel, Dan Lucian Dumitrascu\",\"doi\":\"10.15403/jgld-6289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Fatty liver disease (FLD) is a prevalent condition linked to metabolic disorders and can progress to severe liver diseases. Alterations in apolipoprotein (Apo) levels may provide valuable insights for diagnosing and managing FLD. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates these changes across different FLD phenotypes to evaluate their potential as diagnostic biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated studies from PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus using a predefined search string. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The main summary outcome was the mean difference (MD) in Apo levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 773 initial articles, 55 studies involving 432,328 individuals were included. In NAFLD patients vs. controls, ApoA levels showed a MD of -0.029 (95% CI: -0.133, 0.075), ApoA-I had a MD of -0.064 (95%CI: -0.107, -0.021), and ApoB levels had a MD of 0.098 (95%CI: 0.076, 0.120), while ApoB100 had an MD of 0.042 (95% CI: 0.008, 0.076). For NASH vs. controls, ApoA-I levels had a MD of -0.108 (95% CI: -0.125, -0.091) and ApoB levels had a MD of 0.123 (95% CI: 0.054, 0.193), while ApoB100 had a MD of 0.042 (95% CI: -0.051,0.136). In MAFLD vs. controls, ApoA-I levels had a MD of -0.068 (95% CI: -0.124, -0.012) and ApoB a MD of 0.099 (95% CI: 0.091, 0.107). For diabetic NAFLD vs. T2DM (type 2 diabetes mellitus) without NAFLD, ApoA levels had an MD of 0.028 (95% CI: -0.147, 0.204) and ApoB levels an MD of 0.081 (95% CI: 0.040, 0.122).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In NAFLD patients, ApoA-I levels were lower and ApoB and ApoB100 levels were higher compared to controls, with similar patterns seen in NASH patients, who also had higher ApoB levels than those with simple steatosis. MAFLD patients had elevated ApoB and ApoE levels, while overweight/obese NAFLD patients had higher ApoB levels than controls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"350-361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-6289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-6289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:脂肪肝(FLD)是一种与代谢紊乱相关的常见病,可发展为严重的肝脏疾病。载脂蛋白(Apo)水平的改变可能为FLD的诊断和治疗提供有价值的见解。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了不同FLD表型的这些变化,以评估其作为诊断性生物标志物的潜力。方法:我们使用预定义的搜索字符串对PubMed、EMBASE和Scopus中的研究进行评估。采用预定义的纳入和排除标准,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估偏倚风险。主要的总结结果是载脂蛋白水平的平均差异(MD)。结果:在773篇初始文章中,纳入了55项研究,涉及432,328人。在NAFLD患者与对照组中,ApoA水平的MD为-0.029 (95%CI: -0.133, 0.075), ApoA- i的MD为-0.064 (95%CI: -0.107, -0.021), ApoB水平的MD为0.098 (95%CI: 0.076, 0.120),而ApoB100的MD为0.042 (95%CI: 0.008, 0.076)。NASH与对照组相比,ApoA-I水平的MD为-0.108 (95% CI: -0.125, -0.091), ApoB水平的MD为0.123 (95% CI: 0.054, 0.193),而ApoB100的MD为0.042 (95% CI: -0.051,0.136)。与对照组相比,在MAFLD中,ApoA-I水平的MD为-0.068 (95% CI: -0.124, -0.012), ApoB - a MD为0.099 (95% CI: 0.091, 0.107)。糖尿病性NAFLD与T2DM(2型糖尿病)相比,ApoA水平的MD为0.028 (95% CI: -0.147, 0.204), ApoB水平的MD为0.081 (95% CI: 0.040, 0.122)。结论:在NAFLD患者中,与对照组相比,ApoA-I水平较低,ApoB和ApoB100水平较高,与NASH患者相似,NASH患者的ApoB水平也高于单纯脂肪变性患者。NAFLD患者ApoB和ApoE水平升高,而超重/肥胖NAFLD患者ApoB水平高于对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Apolipoproteins Levels in Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background and aims: Fatty liver disease (FLD) is a prevalent condition linked to metabolic disorders and can progress to severe liver diseases. Alterations in apolipoprotein (Apo) levels may provide valuable insights for diagnosing and managing FLD. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates these changes across different FLD phenotypes to evaluate their potential as diagnostic biomarkers.

Methods: We evaluated studies from PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus using a predefined search string. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The main summary outcome was the mean difference (MD) in Apo levels.

Results: Out of 773 initial articles, 55 studies involving 432,328 individuals were included. In NAFLD patients vs. controls, ApoA levels showed a MD of -0.029 (95% CI: -0.133, 0.075), ApoA-I had a MD of -0.064 (95%CI: -0.107, -0.021), and ApoB levels had a MD of 0.098 (95%CI: 0.076, 0.120), while ApoB100 had an MD of 0.042 (95% CI: 0.008, 0.076). For NASH vs. controls, ApoA-I levels had a MD of -0.108 (95% CI: -0.125, -0.091) and ApoB levels had a MD of 0.123 (95% CI: 0.054, 0.193), while ApoB100 had a MD of 0.042 (95% CI: -0.051,0.136). In MAFLD vs. controls, ApoA-I levels had a MD of -0.068 (95% CI: -0.124, -0.012) and ApoB a MD of 0.099 (95% CI: 0.091, 0.107). For diabetic NAFLD vs. T2DM (type 2 diabetes mellitus) without NAFLD, ApoA levels had an MD of 0.028 (95% CI: -0.147, 0.204) and ApoB levels an MD of 0.081 (95% CI: 0.040, 0.122).

Conclusions: In NAFLD patients, ApoA-I levels were lower and ApoB and ApoB100 levels were higher compared to controls, with similar patterns seen in NASH patients, who also had higher ApoB levels than those with simple steatosis. MAFLD patients had elevated ApoB and ApoE levels, while overweight/obese NAFLD patients had higher ApoB levels than controls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信